[QUOTE=killerteacup;21690359]Ooher!
You should do character profiles like Ace's Dalek one.
Also that's an excellent and concise timeline, love it.
REPOSTING THE THEORY I POSTED (Just for luls)
Okay guys, massive spoiler theory:
[SP] In Flesh and Stone, when The Doctor leaves Amy in the forest, and goes with River and the Bishop, he comes back, and puts his hands on her and tells her to 'remember'. Watch it again. Notice that during that scene, he has his jacket on. Not only this, but its the dark jacket from 'Vampires in Venice', not the one stolen by the angels, and the sleeves are rolled up, which rules out a continuity error by Steven Moffat.
Fans are saying that the doctor during that scene is the Doctor from the future, going back into Amy's timeline at various points for whatever reason. Makes sense too - he's obviously acting a lot more tender when he's telling her to 'remember', and it had seemed like he was already gone.
Also, if you go back to the Eleventh Hour, you have that strange human shadow passing through the house, when child Amy is waiting for the TARDIS to return. It can't be Prisoner Zero, because it takes 'months to make that sort of connection'. Also, child Amy seems to react to the noise of the TARDIS, but then it fast forwards to present day. [/SP]
Thank the guys at Gallifrey Base for that one, sounds very complicated but I'd stake a lot on it being significant.[/QUOTE]
fucking hell
I hope this is something more inventive than parallel worlds.
[editline]08:17PM[/editline]
The future spilling into the past and vice-versa?
[editline]08:18PM[/editline]
Like time looping itself into a knot with the cracks as the focal points.
Sounds about right. Two parts of time that never should have touched; the past and the future.
[QUOTE=Andaeeee;21692560]Am I the only one who thought Chris Eccleston was the best doctor? D:[/QUOTE]
Nope. My favourite too.
Hey, what's the difference between the cracks and the girl in the fireplace?
[QUOTE=DiscoInferno;21701735]Hey, what's the difference between the cracks and the girl in the fireplace?[/QUOTE]
The girl is on fire and the cracks are time fucking up.
[editline]10:46PM[/editline]
[QUOTE=Lol Steve;21694373]Being captain obvious here, that HAS to be it. Because [sp]I just rewatched it, and if it wasn't obvious enough or you didn't say it (I'm sure you did and I just missed it), he goes off without a jacket, comes back with the darker jacket from after this, and does the rest of the episode without one. That's future Who for sure, but some time after Venice, maybe the finale would make sense.
Also, somehow with the theory that he caused the "explosion", I think this is a mix of the End of Time and the Last Great Time War, as would be obvious, and it's caused by the shit what went down by Rassilon's hand along with the closing of the Medusa Cascade and use of "the Moment", whatever it was. Again, captain obvious.[/sp][/QUOTE]
Aren't you not allowed to go back on your own time line?
Steven Moffat has something in plan for us. Is he going to turn out to be the Stanley Kubrik of Doctor Who episodes?
By my remembrance only "not allowed" by guidelines and sense. It's still entirely possible, just not advised. There's a morality to it, but that's another issue entirely. It could be an alteration to put something right, or an alteration for personal goals. Who knows.
Reminds me of how the other day I was pondering upon the subject of time travel and these "guidelines" always included in science fiction. They're almost always present, but why? I'm sure there's some morality to it, but past that, there's nothing holding it back. I doubt it'd actually rip a hole in the universe or something. (Then again, this is a fictional debate. :V)
[QUOTE=KillerTV;21697449]I will never understand this train of thought.[/QUOTE]
The latest doctor whos have been awful, they're just so silly it's unbelieveable.
[QUOTE=carcarcargo;21702747]The latest doctor whos have been awful, they're just so silly it's unbelieveable.[/QUOTE]
Doctor who has always had a silly element. For example, take the jelly babies.
[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mfisgGuuUD8[/media]
[QUOTE=carcarcargo;21702747]The latest doctor whos have been awful, they're just so silly it's unbelieveable.[/QUOTE]
There were a whole bunch of dumb RTD episodes, but I can't say I've seen a silly episode since the start of the new season. The weakest would have been victory of the daleks but that was written by Mark Gatiss.
For example, what was silly about the most recent 2-parter?
I was hoping that episode would look at Amys crack in more detail.
I love her crack.
[editline]11:25PM[/editline]
[QUOTE=carcarcargo;21702747]The latest doctor whos have been awful, they're just so silly it's unbelieveable.[/QUOTE]
Wow, you do realise that Doctor Who is supposed to be silly right?
[editline]11:36PM[/editline]
[IMG]http://pokemonger.com/gimp/doctorwho.jpg[/IMG]
Amy Pond:
[LIST=1]
[*]Is a Billie Piper fan..
[*]Has pictures of herself wearing that same outfit, she didn't pack so that costume came from the TARDIS.
[*]Had a drawing of a woman in a long skirt. She may draw long skirts, thank god she doesn't wear them.
[*] That face.. on the door. Holy shit, it's scary.
[/LIST]
These time cracks though, what if it was to do because of the last series, like Rose and that shit?
Cracks = Pandorica opening an episode which includes [sp]The Cybermen, The Daleks, atleast a single Sontaran and "A strange enemy from the 80's"[/sp] and rumoured [sp]Silurian, Prisoner Zero, Judoon[/sp]
[img_thumb]http://img263.imageshack.us/img263/9079/amypond.png[/img_thumb]
seeing as it's DW related, thought I'd post this here.
I got bored so I started doing a drawing of amy walking out of the TARDIS, but I need some help (it's meant to be a bit cartoony by the way, I wasn't aiming for realism at all)
I don't know what to draw her face like.
I know her hand and arse need sorting (her hand is just in an odd position).
The TARDIS is a lot better on paper, I traced on quickly because amy is the problem.
Also it's just a quick trace for quick feedback :)
[img]http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2010/04/30/article-0-0960512C000005DC-89_468x363.jpg[/img]
It's an outrage, this is disgusting. It' completely threw me. WHY DOES HE GET TO MAKE OUT WITH HER AND NOT ME?
If he's not hard, something is wrong. She's so damn hot.
[editline]11:58PM[/editline]
[QUOTE=aero1444;21703552][img_thumb]http://img263.imageshack.us/img263/9079/amypond.png[/img_thumb]
I don't know what to draw her face like.[/QUOTE]
Thing about drawing Amy, it's like drawing beauty.
No.
It IS drawing beauty. Really fucking very hard.
It needs to be next week like now.
"Tomorrow is always a big day, I have a time machine, I just skip the little ones"
You know, I've seen it asked many times about sex scenes and stuff and people wonder how the guy doesn't get aroused. I've heard explanations including cock socks and whatever, so I guess it's fine. That seems much more awkward, because they probably had to shoot it several times, and it'd be entirely up to Smith's own self restraint. And with Karen Gillian...
Well, I feel lecherous now. What the hell did that have to do with Doctor Who? :v:
hang on, upon my browsing of DW wiki, i found this.
[IMG]http://images3.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20060822065858/tardis/images/3/31/Oou.jpg[/IMG]
[sp]is that a new dalek in the back ground?[/sp]
Fuck that, is that casual Davros? Done with ruling the world, called inferior by the new Mighty Morphin' Daleks and decided "screw it, I'm going to Starbucks"?
[IMG]http://images2.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20070720145100/tardis/images/b/bd/Cybermen_in_France.jpg[/IMG]
Big fucking french suprise.
[editline]12:10AM[/editline]
[QUOTE=Lol Steve;21703801]Fuck that, is that casual Davros? Done with ruling the world, called inferior by the new Mighty Morphin' Daleks and decided "screw it, I'm going to Starbucks"?[/QUOTE]
It's Disability Benefit Fraud Davros!
[QUOTE=BugsyXoX;21703733]hang on, upon my browsing of DW wiki, i found this.
[IMG]http://images3.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20060822065858/tardis/images/3/31/Oou.jpg[/IMG]
[sp]is that a new dalek in the back ground?[/sp][/QUOTE]
No. It's a Dalek from one of the 80's episodes.
Either Revelation of the Daleks or Remembrance of the Daleks. Probably the former as it is just head makeup.
I got these episodes on DVD today. All The Davros, Silurian and Sontaran episodes. Started with Genesis of The Daleks. It's good but I hate Sarah Jane and her yellow rain coat.
It's one of these.
[img]http://www.chrisbalcombe.f2s.com/images/effects1.jpg[/img]
[editline]12:14AM[/editline]
Yep, what Dan said.
[QUOTE=Dan2593;21702896]I was hoping that episode would look at Amys crack in more detail.
I love her crack.
[editline]11:25PM[/editline]
Wow, you do realise that Doctor Who is supposed to be silly right?
[editline]11:36PM[/editline]
[IMG_thumb]http://pokemonger.com/gimp/doctorwho.jpg[/IMG_thumb]
Amy Pond:
[LIST=1]
[*]Is a Billie Piper fan..
[*]Has pictures of herself wearing that same outfit, she didn't pack so that costume came from the TARDIS.
[*]Had a drawing of a woman in a long skirt. She may draw long skirts, thank god she doesn't wear them.
[*] That face.. on the door. Holy shit, it's scary.
[/LIST][/QUOTE]
1. It's Rose, it has to be.
2. ...I have no idea.
3. No explanation needed...
4. That's the empty child gas mask!
I think somehow Amy might have pulled a rose, kinda, and did some research about the Doctor over those 12 years he was gone.
I shat bricks when Amy had to grope through the dark and the angels started moving. I don't know why it was so unsettling but it freaked me out no end. It was scarier than them being invisible and moving.
[QUOTE=DainBramageStudios;21693633]Put fancy headers and things on it too.
"SPECULATION CORNER"
[editline]04:41PM[/editline]
Some of the Angels looked at each other, but the important thing is that they weren't ALL looking at each other. When there's no one looking the one's that aren't being looked at can turn around the statues that are.
[editline]04:43PM[/editline]
[IMG]http://i39.tinypic.com/xct8ye.png[/IMG][/QUOTE]
That's such an adorable idea.
"Oh, Tiffany's gone and looked at Jeff again! Those two really are nutters. I'll move her around now."
"Oh, thanks pet! I couldn't bear being a statue a moment longer, my nose is really itchy!"
[QUOTE=Dan2593;21703588][img]http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2010/04/30/article-0-0960512C000005DC-89_468x363.jpg[/img]
It's an outrage, this is disgusting. It' completely threw me. WHY DOES HE GET TO MAKE OUT WITH HER AND NOT ME?
If he's not hard, something is wrong. She's so damn hot.
[/QUOTE]
More confusingly is that she's gone for him. I mean, ok, we get that she's fallen in love with him but still, you can't wank over personality! That scene was so tremendously awkward. I think the guy's a great actor but he's just not attractive.
[QUOTE=BugsyXoX;21703822][IMG]http://images2.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20070720145100/tardis/images/b/bd/Cybermen_in_France.jpg[/IMG]
Big fucking french suprise.
[/QUOTE]
That's from a Rose era story, when people think they're talking to ghosts when in fact it's just alternate-reality cybermen.
[QUOTE=BugsyXoX;21703822][IMG]http://images2.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20070720145100/tardis/images/b/bd/Cybermen_in_France.jpg[/IMG]
[/quote]
They probably already surrended to the ghosts anyway
What do you guys think so far?
[IMG_thumb]http://img15.imageshack.us/img15/9079/amypond.png[/IMG_thumb]
The shading's pretty cool.
It's all layer styles too so it's 100% scalable.
You mean it's a vector?
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
