[QUOTE=Bigboy855;16604875]Basically everyone in the U.S. has somesort of gun for selfdefense, hunting relaxing, for looks, [/QUOTE]
Basically you are wrong.
[QUOTE=Bigboy855;16604875]I think that if obama takes away our guns that he will be killed, hate to be so bold about it but, it's not in his best interest if he puts a ban on guns or a restriction on them. [/QUOTE]
If it was going to happen, it would have already happened.
I'm certain he doesn't lose a moment's sleep re-thinking how his choices affect the American people's opinions about him.
[QUOTE=Sh33p;16604721]Happiness insurance? We get nationally provided happiness through the NHS.[/QUOTE]
lol
[QUOTE=Bigboy855;16604875]My dad manages a gun wharehouse, They ship out about 6,000 guns a day varying from pistols to rifles to shotguns to ammunition to holsters to sights to scopes, anything basically. Right now there are at least 40,000 guns in his wharehouse. They are constantly being sold, SINCE OBAMA BECAME PRESIDENT SALES HAVE INCREASED 200%, thank Mr. president for my dads big bonus. Anyway, The state of califonia destroys 6000 guns a year recovered at crime scenes or found ect. Basically everyone in the U.S. has somesort of gun for selfdefense, hunting relaxing, for looks, Th Barret .50 cal cost around 9,000 wholesale and retail is just too much, each bullet costs 3-4$ each, expensive. aybasically my point is that there are so many guns in the U.S that it would be retarded to try and take them all back or set restrictions on them, I think that if obama takes away our guns that he will be killed, hate to be so bold about it but, it's not in his best interest if he puts a ban on guns or a restriction on them.
Sorry for such a long post[/QUOTE]
Bwahahaha.
Yeah.
Why is it not in his best intrest? Since a 50cal costs money?
[QUOTE=Lankist;16604916]Basically you are wrong.[/QUOTE]
Someone in your family, or someone you know owns a gun, you may not know but they do, it may be secret or it may be in a cabinet in the living room.
[QUOTE=Bigboy855;16607127]Someone in your family, or someone you know owns a gun, you may not know but they do, it may be secret or it may be in a cabinet in the living room.[/QUOTE]
If you need to prove that nobody has a gun, you need to inspect every single one to prove that.
If you need to prove that everybody has a gun, finding someone who doesn't have is enough.
It takes 10 seconds to find someone in the USA that doesn't have a gun.
If guns are banned the millions of good people will have to pay the price and the bad people already get guns illegally so it won't stop them a bit. FUCK YOU OBAMA!
[QUOTE=Bigboy855;16607127]Someone in your family, or someone you know owns a gun, you may not know but they do, it may be secret or it may be in a cabinet in the living room.[/QUOTE]
Someone in your family, or someone you know is a rapist, you may not know but they are, it may be secret or they may do it in a secret basement or in their living room.
[editline]03:57PM[/editline]
FYI I own guns.
Canada has no guns and the crime rates are lower than in America. (Well it's harder to obtain guns here anyways)
[QUOTE=Agent_Wesker;16607558]Canada has no guns and the crime rates are lower than in America. (Well it's harder to obtain guns here anyways)[/QUOTE]
No offense but Canada is not relevant, you guys have it WAY to good.
[QUOTE=Agent_Wesker;16607558]Canada has no guns and the crime rates are lower than in America. (Well it's harder to obtain guns here anyways)[/QUOTE]
Canada also has lots of beavers maybe that has something to do with it
[QUOTE=Lankist;16607507]Someone in your family, or someone you know is a rapist, you may not know but they are, it may be secret or they may do it in a secret basement or in their living room.
[editline]03:57PM[/editline]
FYI I own guns.[/QUOTE]
FYI My step uncle carl is a rapist
I do not remember where I heard this from, but I believe this is relevant.
[quote]
A gun makes an explosion, makes something go really fast, and can kill things. Is there really much more badass then that?[/quote]
There are far more pressing things in this nation then gun control. People will find ways to kill each no matter what you do.
Take away guns, they use sharp objects, take those away, they use blunt objects, take that a few they will use their bare hands.
You can never forget human nature, if you can't have it you want it. Thats why under age drinking isn't a big deal in Europe.
Our part of the world has a problem with sex. Their part of the world has a problem with violence.
[QUOTE=4RT1LL3RY;16614607]I do not remember where I heard this from, but I believe this is relevant.
There are far more pressing things in this nation then gun control. People will find ways to kill each no matter what you do.
Take away guns, they use sharp objects, take those away, they use blunt objects, take that a few they will use their bare hands.
You can never forget human nature, if you can't have it you want it. Thats why under age drinking isn't a big deal in Europe.
Our part of the world has a problem with sex. Their part of the world has a problem with violence.[/QUOTE]
True, humans get what they want no matter how much it will cost.
[QUOTE=Bigboy855;16613845]FYI My step uncle carl is a rapist[/QUOTE]
now little billy this is important
where did carl touch you
[editline]10:11PM[/editline]
[img]http://www.teddy-bear-shop.co.uk/teddy.jpg[/img]
Can you point to it?
[QUOTE=Cheezy;16603849]If an illiterate 8-year old african can use an AK I highly doubt there's that much to killing someone with a firearm.[/QUOTE]
They can use it, but the question is if they can even shoot a group at 25 yards.
The defense argument for the 2A is pointless, yes, because that isn't what the 2A is about. It's about the government really fuckin' up everything and us needing to take back control. A doomsday amendment, if the US goes to hell in a handbasket.
Which is why I think that the NFA ought to be abolished. If the military has M16s, why don't we? We should at least be able to have access to the rifle the military uses. The Swiss system seems to work. Every man a soldier. Every person gets a select-fire rifle, with some ammo for national/state emergencies. Legalize weed and LSD, but keep the hard drugs restricted.
Not to mention that the right to bear arms is in the fucking constitution. We're not going to lose that right, do not worry.
[editline]06:37AM[/editline]
[QUOTE=Lankist;16614801]now little billy this is important
where did carl touch you
[editline]10:11PM[/editline]
[img]http://www.teddy-bear-shop.co.uk/teddy.jpg[/img]
Can you point to it?[/QUOTE]
you aren't funny and quite frankly a lot of your posts annoy me
They should eliminate gang wars by making a few highly mobilized, heavily armoured walkers with twin vulcan miniguns on the arms, it has an advanced tracking system that picks up people carrying weapons (high metal concentration) and locks onto them.
A report would be recieved of a gang war taking place, the vulcan would mobilize with jetpacks and land right in the middle of them, before they can even try to leave the scene they'll be locked down and decimated by the miniguns.
It'd be a good example, gang wars would stop after a few of them get totally destroyed with no survivors.
[QUOTE=PoorFellow;16621089]Not to mention that the right to bear arms is in the fucking constitution. We're not going to lose that right, do not worry.
[editline]06:37AM[/editline]
you aren't funny and quite frankly a lot of your posts annoy me[/QUOTE]
quite frankly my dear i dont give a damn
[QUOTE=Lankist;16621254]quite frankly my dear i dont give a damn[/QUOTE]
okay
[QUOTE=NuclearAnnhilation;16555798]In response to the Obama gun banning thread, there is no way we can get rid of all the guns he says. It doesn't matter if something is illegal. It always ends in more violence than the first place. For example, back in the day when the Government banned alcohol. It made way more violence with gangs and moonshiners transporting alcohol and everyone still got it and the Government ended up lifting the ban as we all know. Another is drugs. Weed, heroin, crack and so on is all banned and illegal but people can still get it. Easily, very easily. If those guns were banned people would still get them. They can't contain it. I don't see how the Government always seems to overlook this.[/QUOTE]
You can't brew or grow guns, that's why Alcohol and Drugs were/are/is so readily available. However, shitloads of guns do still exist so your point still stands. That, and a lot of guns are manufactured outside of America.
Also, there are a lot of jobs in firearms design and manufacture, not to mention ranges and the like which would go out of business with nothing to shoot with.
[QUOTE=Hunt3r.j2;16619067]They can use it, but the question is if they can even shoot a group at 25 yards.
The defense argument for the 2A is pointless, yes, because that isn't what the 2A is about. It's about the government really fuckin' up everything and us needing to take back control. A doomsday amendment, if the US goes to hell in a handbasket.
Which is why I think that the NFA ought to be abolished. If the military has M16s, why don't we? We should at least be able to have access to the rifle the military uses. The Swiss system seems to work. Every man a soldier. Every person gets a select-fire rifle, with some ammo for national/state emergencies. Legalize weed and LSD, but keep the hard drugs restricted.[/QUOTE]
There's a lot more bullshit gun laws than the NFA.
Import laws specifically, as well as 922r. But yea, banning SBRs and SBSs unless you wait around 6 months for paper work specifically for the weapon is ridiculous.
Automatics might as well be legal with a little more through background check, instead of the ridiculous laws that exist currently for no real reason.
[QUOTE=Lankist;16614801]now little billy this is important
where did carl touch you
[editline]10:11PM[/editline]
[img]http://www.teddy-bear-shop.co.uk/teddy.jpg[/img]
Can you point to it?[/QUOTE]
Don't be an ass.
[editline]09:08AM[/editline]
[QUOTE=Morbo!!!;16621610]You can't brew or grow guns, that's why Alcohol and Drugs were/are/is so readily available. However, shitloads of guns do still exist so your point still stands. That, and a lot of guns are manufactured outside of America.
Also, there are a lot of jobs in firearms design and manufacture, not to mention ranges and the like which would go out of business with nothing to shoot with.[/QUOTE]
Yeah, if obama let people stop selling or distributing guns he would kill thousands of jobs, and put many people out on the street.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
