A black man disagrees with fervorent tumblr user about sexual practises - General

Devil's Advocate: Is Fucking a Plant bad too? If so, how does it compare in awfulness to bestiality?

[QUOTE=Destroyox;49285504]Devil's Advocate: Is Fucking a Plant bad too? If so, how does it compare in awfulness to bestiality?[/QUOTE] That cucumber can't consent you disgusting bigot.

But is a cucumber even alive? I thought it was the plant that was alive not the fruit.

[IMG]http://i.imgur.com/euJGOaC.png[/IMG]

[QUOTE=ghosevil;49276623]If the dog sustains an erection I think that's evidence enough.[/QUOTE] That doesn't work for humans, why would it work for dogs.

Facepunch never fails to deliver on the Pedo Apologists and Dog fuckers [highlight](User was permabanned for this post ("gimmick" - Orkel))[/highlight]

[QUOTE=Mattk50;49285932]That doesn't work for humans, why would it work for dogs.[/QUOTE] Somewhat relevant; [video=youtube;Ikd0ZYQoDko]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ikd0ZYQoDko[/video] Erection =/= Consent.

[QUOTE=Destroyox;49285504]Devil's Advocate: Is Fucking a Plant bad too? If so, how does it compare in awfulness to bestiality?[/QUOTE] depends what you mean by fucking it i guess though i can guarantee most people will still not appreciate you bukakeing their bonsai

[QUOTE=DogFucker;49285990]Facepunch never fails to deliver on the Pedo Apologists and Dog fuckers[/QUOTE] I'm surprised that account name wasn't taken before [editline]10th December 2015[/editline] [QUOTE=ChloeBlackSythe;49284347]... [url]http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/bestiality[/url] [url]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zoophilia[/url] Read it, seriously. No, Zoophilia, is the act of the animal giving consent "Because animals can in fact give consent" and bestiality is "Forcing yourself onto the animal and doing it whether it likes it or not"[/QUOTE] If you don't mind me asking when you're unbanned; why does it matter to you whether someone understands the difference between the two?

To play the devils advocate we do a lot of shit to animals without their "express consent" like slaughtering them or milking them. Consent isn't really a good argument. Not that I support bestiality at all, ever.

[QUOTE=J!NX;49281843]Comparing homosexuality to bestiality doesn't work because of many reasons 1. Homosexuality should be covered under basic human rights. 2. Homosexuality involves two consenting adult humans (unless it's pedophilia but that's totally separate) 3. Homosexuality really isn't a fetish like bestiality is, it's a sexual orientation. Bestiality doesn't include any of those things. You can't compare it, especially when it involves two HUMANS. Same thing applies to pedophilia VS homosexuality only in different ways. If you need to use homosexuality as a contrast to justify banging animals then your argument is just fundamentally flawed (No one has here though). Generally people compare gay marriage to bestiality because they think of gays as second class citizens who need to be treated like animals, which is why everyone jumps on the chance to shit on anyone that does it even remotely. There's a valid reason to scoff at it.[/QUOTE] None of that is relevant to the fact saying "it's gross" is not a valid argument against either of them, which is what the point of the original post was. The two are comparable in that people use that argument in both cases. How is that a hard concept to grasp?

[QUOTE=Kyle902;49286568]To play the devils advocate we do a lot of shit to animals without their "express consent" like slaughtering them or milking them. Consent isn't really a good argument. Not that I support bestiality at all, ever.[/QUOTE] On the flip side, I feel like that sort of argument could also be used against the act of slaughtering/milking animals, because by comparing that to rape (Not that those two are exactly the same, of course), it kinda shows that we tend to take unfair advantage of them.

That was fucking great.

[QUOTE=Skerion;49287295]On the flip side, I feel like that sort of argument could also be used against the act of slaughtering/milking animals, because by comparing that to rape (Not that those two are exactly the same, of course), it kinda shows that we tend to take unfair advantage of them.[/QUOTE] The thing is, the natural world has proven itself to be unfair, and it would be silly to handicap ourselves by not killing animals for food because we got lucky with the evolutionary dice roll. i'm certain that many animal species had they evolved the same level of communication as we had would do the same with us. on that note, i doubt they would rape us if they were in our position, or if they did it wouldn't be the norm. of course there [i]are[/i] some species of animal that do rape other species (such as dolphins, interestingly enough), but we're better than that.

[QUOTE=ChloeBlackSythe;49284276]1. You're a idiot. 2. Your acting like you obviously are a child. 3. If you really are happy being a "Closed minded Bigot" Then im fine with that, i'm not the one being a complete ass to people because im comparing being a pedophile to animals when its respectably to kids itself. But we all know that the idiots usually get the credit for this shit. Also, its nice knowing that "A, none of you have a open mind" and "B, all of you are probably idiots with a closed mind, thinking nothing is ever ok with being weird in this world, cause we need to limit ourselves to adults, obviously cause you think that fucking a animal is so bad and only being able to masturbate and fuck other people is good" seriously, grow the fuck up already and see that fucking everything that could or would want it is not wrong. Should really just make this a "banme" thread lol. [highlight](User was banned for this post ("flaming" - GunFox))[/highlight][/QUOTE] A dog cannot consent.

facepunch being weird again

[QUOTE=RopaDope;49290603]facepunch being weird again[/QUOTE] You know you love it.

Are people in here arguing for the rights to rape animals in here??

fucking dogfuckers

[QUOTE=_Axel;49281344]Animals can't consent to getting killed either but most people don't seem to mind eating meat. Why is it different when it's about sex? I'm pretty sure a child killer would be hated much more than a molester would be.[/QUOTE] True I mean that's a good argument, but I'd also like to point out that on one hand fucking/molesting an animal or a child causes psychological damage to both. So personally I think that molesting a child or animal is worse than killing. Not that I wish either to happen but at least the child or animal doesn't have to suffer a life being sexually assaulted. Also people are pretty against killing animals that are pets. It's true that they would no be condemned like a human killer, but we generally consider that anti social behavior. I'd like to think I could keep an open mind to most things but this is just disgusting.

[QUOTE=omarfr;49293385]True I mean that's a good argument, but I'd also like to point out that on one hand fucking/molesting an animal or a child causes psychological damage to both. So personally I think that molesting a child or animal is worse than killing. Not that I wish either to happen but at least the child or animal doesn't have to suffer a life being sexually assaulted.[/QUOTE] You think suffering is worse than being dead? That's a bit weird IMO, pain is a mechanism designed to prevent living beings from dying in the first place, I don't see how circumventing that mechanism to practice so-called "humane kills" makes it less cruel than torture. [QUOTE]Also people are pretty against killing animals that are pets. It's true that they would no be condemned like a human killer, but we generally consider that anti social behavior.[/QUOTE] That's true, but I doubt zoophiles who exclusively rape farm animals gather any more sympathy than the others, so that doesn't seem to be the main reason here.

[QUOTE=_Axel;49293558]You think suffering is worse than being dead? That's a bit weird IMO, pain is a mechanism designed to prevent living beings from dying in the first place, I don't see how circumventing that mechanism to practice so-called "humane kills" makes it less cruel than torture.[/QUOTE] Well, considering that rape has a lasting effect upon an individual (physically and psychologically), human or animal, death may be considered by some to be lesser in comparison. A great deal of rape victims suffer from a variety of problems, which causes a tendency toward suicidal thoughts and actions. [editline]11th December 2015[/editline] [QUOTE=Arc Nova;49292425]fucking dogfuckers[/QUOTE] And thus, the thread checklist is complete with appearance of ArcNova.

[QUOTE=I;49285619][IMG]http://i.imgur.com/euJGOaC.png[/IMG][/QUOTE] Does anyone have anything on videogamedunkey's new video having legit bestiality linked to its comments, and everyone replying to it with sexually confused thoughts? Just one link and bam. I swear, the internet [I]makes[/I] sexual deviants.

[QUOTE=Talvy;49294788]I swear, the internet [I]makes[/I] sexual deviants.[/QUOTE] Naw, it just makes them visible.

Why the fuck do we have people defending beastilality? And not the original guy who was playing Diablo's Avocado.

if i had a dollar for every goddamn time i visited a thread to watch a video of some freak, left, then was told by my friend to READ the same thread i visited earlier to see the shitshow the thread devolved into, i fucking swear. i once saw a thread on this forum about people feeling bad for hitler because he had a panic attack. i will never forget that for as long as i live.

Personally I find bestiality gross as shit, but I don't get the point about consent. You don't need the dog's consent to keep it on a leash. You don't need the dog's consent to lock it outside the house. You don't need a dog's consent to have a vet do an operation on it. Why do you need a dog's consent to have sex with it? How is the situation different? Is it emotionally damaging to the dog? It seems to me that you're simply taking human emotions and applying it to a dog in a very specific circumstance and ignoring any others. I don't have qualms with it being illegal, of course, but honestly I don't think the laws are really preventing anything. No one is going to notice unless the animal is actually hurt (or well, if they're caught in the act), and that's already covered by the laws about animal abuse.

[QUOTE=GoDong-DK;49296983]Personally I find bestiality gross as shit, but I don't get the point about consent. You don't need the dog's consent to keep it on a leash. You don't need the dog's consent to lock it outside the house. You don't need a dog's consent to have a vet do an operation on it. Why do you need a dog's consent to have sex with it? How is the situation different? Is it emotionally damaging to the dog? It seems to me that you're simply taking human emotions and applying it to a dog in a very specific circumstance and ignoring any others. I don't have qualms with it being illegal, of course, but honestly I don't think the laws are really preventing anything. No one is going to notice unless the animal is actually hurt (or well, if they're caught in the act), and that's already covered by the laws about animal abuse.[/QUOTE] it can definitely damage dogs emotionally, it's a form of abuse like any other. depending on how severe it was they can develop lifelong anxiety issues.

[QUOTE=Kyle902;49286568]To play the devils advocate we do a lot of shit to animals without their "express consent" like slaughtering them or milking them. Consent isn't really a good argument. Not that I support bestiality at all, ever.[/QUOTE] I'm pretty sure there is a [I]huge as [B]fuck[/B][/I] difference between sexual consent and, y'know, using animals for nutritional reasons. Unless a cow were to somehow have a milking fetish or someshit, I dunno

[QUOTE=Cone;49297540]it can definitely damage dogs emotionally, it's a form of abuse like any other. depending on how severe it was they can develop lifelong anxiety issues.[/QUOTE] Especially when you look at the physical differences. YES dogs are [I]not[/I] physically meant to have sex with humans. And how is the situation different? You do those things, like the leash, the vet, etc., for the dogs own good. You can't tell me raping a dog is for their own good.