• Zach Anner Update!
    171 replies, posted
it should have been 1 IP Adress = 1 Vote
This. Picture. [img]http://media05.kyte.tv/store/007/05/crr/1005/16/03/2412201-0-jacquelineownsubmission_mov_120_90-tom-1000.jpg?h=94f8a7de2e8c14eecc343fbc2b5d8baf[/img] /rage I don't even understand this. I do understand how they could have removed some votes by the same IPs from Zach. But how are they trying to justify adding to the votes?
[QUOTE=Mr_Sun;23249815]READ THE THREAD the top bitch GAINED 2 million votes while zach lost 3/4[/QUOTE] And the rules allowed people to vote more than once...
What the fuck, how could this happen?!
If you deny that using a script for voting is cheating then why would it be against the "rules" when Oprah is voting multiple times on Doctor Phyllis or that other woman?
[QUOTE=creefer;23249787]You guys are stupid. They want to assume that one vote = one person, because most people don't go vote more than once. Using a vote spammer is obviously cheating because it doesn't actually represent the share of people who want him to get the show. I like this guy as much as anyone else, but come on.[/QUOTE] Yeah I agree, but the fact that some have went up in votes is strange. The whole system seems flawed.
[QUOTE=No_0ne;23236876]aSSEMBLE THE ANGRY MOB[/QUOTE] I'll bring the pitchforks [editline]02:06PM[/editline]
Zach is bugged. :iceburn:
god damnit oprah, we dont want a generic housewife copy, we want zach.
What you guys can do is expose Oprah by giving media this evidence. Email around to journalists/newspapers, send them this, let's make sure Oprah won't get away with it!
This is what you get for cheating. hahahaHAHAHAA
Said one and I'll say it again, shit was rigged from the start. Probably just did the whole user video thing to make it seem like Oprah actually cared about her fans, when in reality this dumb school teacher was the winner all along.
[QUOTE=ahref;23249828]it should have been 1 IP Adress = 1 Vote[/QUOTE] I'm guessing they were just lazy. Then they'd have to keep a database of all the IPs that voted, and cross check every time someone voted. It's not [i]that[/i] hard to do. Maybe they just didn't want to waste the resources.
[QUOTE=Gengar;23250259]If you deny that using a script for voting is cheating then why would it be against the "rules" when Oprah is voting multiple times on Doctor Phyllis or that other woman?[/QUOTE] Different fucking thing. We votebotted Zach Anner, true. Oprah made it so each vote to Zach gave Syphllis 3 votes. What Oprah did was inexcusable. If she was pissed that Zach had illegitimate support than just disqualify him. But what she did was choose a person to win the competition. She removed any remote possibility of this being fair by rigging the inner workings of the contest and the voting system. And now she has the fucking gall to blatantly give people 2,000,000 votes for no reason and remove 1/3 of Zachs votes? Votebotting was cheating sure, but going out and re-coding the vote system to make everything illegitimate is far worse. [quote=Spontaneous: ]Website votes is just a part of this contest. I think its wrong you are using your handicap to get votes and try to win. This is not fair. Sorry, but you will not win. Good luck[/quote] INCONCEIVABLE RAGE.
Sometimes i wonder if everyone except people like us realise this sort of thing. Either that or nobody wants to mention it.
I hope the various news outlets that commented on the rigging when it was first discovered haven't forgotten about this.
[QUOTE=Ordinorino;23252406]This is what you get for cheating. hahahaHAHAHAA[/QUOTE] Oprah? Is that you?
Alert /b/ [B]NOW[/B]
It looks fine to me, he's still in 1st with over 9 million votes.
[QUOTE=Micr0;23253896]It looks fine to me, he's still in 1st with over 9 million votes.[/QUOTE] *facepalm*..
[QUOTE=Carbon Knight;23252759]Different fucking thing. We votebotted Zach Anner, true. Oprah made it so each vote to Zach gave Syphllis 3 votes. What Oprah did was inexcusable. If she was pissed that Zach had illegitimate support than just disqualify him. But what she did was choose a person to win the competition. She removed any remote possibility of this being fair by rigging the inner workings of the contest and the voting system. And now she has the fucking gall to blatantly give people 2,000,000 votes for no reason and remove 1/3 of Zachs votes? Votebotting was cheating sure, but going out and re-coding the vote system to make everything illegitimate is far worse. INCONCEIVABLE RAGE.[/QUOTE] Both parties are inexcusable. Oprah rigged the contest, and cheated out everyone out of a chance of a lifetime, but at the same time, so did everyone that cheated. You people decided "fuck all these people, why should THEY get a fair shot at this?" which is pretty much the exact same thing Oprah did. What really frustrates me about all this is that whenever the internet clings to someone in one of these polls they can never get the guy to win in a legit way. They always have to cheat the votes.
[QUOTE=77boy84;23254450]Both parties are inexcusable. Oprah rigged the contest, and cheated out everyone out of a chance of a lifetime, but at the same time, so did everyone that cheated. You people decided "fuck all these people, why should THEY get a fair shot at this?" which is pretty much the exact same thing Oprah did. What really frustrates me about all this is that whenever the internet clings to someone in one of these polls they can never get the guy to win in a legit way. They always have to cheat the votes.[/QUOTE] There is a difference between votebots and altering the vote buttons coding. Both are cheating but one is far worse.
[QUOTE=Carbon Knight;23254482]There is a difference between votebots and altering the vote buttons coding. Both are cheating but one is far worse.[/QUOTE] No, neither are worse, because at the end of the day, you're both screwing over everyone else that entered the contest.
[QUOTE=77boy84;23254672]No, neither are worse, because at the end of the day, you're both screwing over everyone else that entered the contest.[/QUOTE] No, making it so that every vote someone gets gives another person 3 votes is internal rigging which is worse than external rigging.
Nobody cares that the Zach camp cheated because Zach is awesome and all the other fags suck. [editline]07:46PM[/editline] They should have used the one vote per day per facebook/twitter/whatever account system like the web awards. That worked very well and is practically uncheatable.
[QUOTE=BmB;23254991] They should have used the one vote per day per facebook/twitter/whatever account system like the web awards. That worked very well and is practically uncheatable.[/QUOTE] Didn't that end up in Justin Beiber's tour going to North Korea?
what the dicks?
[QUOTE=codenamecueball;23235929]Too fucking far Oprah. You have just declared war with 4chan and the last time that happened, well, lets just say joshchristian100 is now history.[/QUOTE] Joshchristian100 was a troll, there was a guy who was a troll and he had a little brother who played the character of josh. Possibly the greatest troll in history.
The cover of The Glove had a big thing on this today, I almost actually got a copy
The bitch rigged it.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.