• How much physical data makes up a person and teleportation
    198 replies, posted
[QUOTE=Wisebrant;15992435]According to my year 12 science teacher they did.[/QUOTE] Right. I doubt it even more now. But, I do like chatting about these issues, however impossible they are.
[QUOTE=Spork-Juct;15992537]But what happens if someone else uses a teleport and the 2 "lines" accidentally cross? [/QUOTE] [img]http://www.technovelgy.com/graphics/content09/crossed.jpg[/img]
[QUOTE=lmaoboat;15992709][img]http://www.technovelgy.com/graphics/content09/crossed.jpg[/img][/QUOTE] You got the reference.
[QUOTE=Spork-Juct;15992537]But what happens if someone else uses a teleport and the 2 "streams" accidentally cross? Either way, the creation of a teleport would lead to the creation of cloning*, and the creation of the Genetics machine**. (* = But Matter can't be created or destroyed, so how would large scale teleportation work if it's creating and destroying matter?) (** = If you're not sure what this means, it's something in strange Sci-Fi movies that is a capsule thingy that scans the user and lets the user change their natural body.)[/QUOTE] yeah that 2 stream cross is rare. but yeah according to our modern physics(Newtonian physics) teleportation is bleh. cuz you have to accelerate. it could be easier said that you go to one universe and back to yours so it seems like you teleported cuz time went by while you wasent thar. also they managed to do "teleportation" on a molecular lvl, check it out on google. sorry i sound like fuck and dont wana write much, jet lag is killin me
[QUOTE=ArcNova;15992149] Moon exists, teleportation does not.[/QUOTE] We don't know that for sure. Just because it hasn't been proven doesn't mean it's an impossibility. :science:
Someone has successfully teleported the states of a single atom, and that's about it. [url]http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/3811785.stm[/url] There's a lot more science and physics involved than this thread would make it seem.
[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-FqLCLooayM[/media] Only the states of photons and single atoms of caesium and beryllium has been teleported so far, but it's a start.
[QUOTE=Wisebrant;15992435]According to my year 12 science teacher they did.[/QUOTE] Teachers don't know SHIT. It isn't exactly hard to become a teacher!
[QUOTE=Master117;15992031]It has come to my attention that people currently in this thread are either stubborn or idiots...[/QUOTE] And it has come to our attention that you made a thread about a common idea, which is going to get flammed no matter what.
Is it possible? No idea. Will it happen? Probably not. I think people saying "Nope. Impossible" should shut up for one reason. That kind of thinking gets us nowhere. While we may not get teleportation, we can work towards it anyways. Half of the good discovers in science were discovered while looking for something else. Nay-sayers suck balls.
[QUOTE=ArcNova;15992149]But here is the difference. Moon exists, teleportation does not.[/QUOTE] It's a hell of a lot more complicated than that.
[QUOTE=thisispain;15993049]It's a hell of a lot more complicated than that.[/QUOTE] Ssh, you'll overload someone's brain.
[QUOTE=HumanAbyss;15993040]I think people saying "Nope. Impossible" should shut up for one reason. That kind of thinking gets us nowhere.[/QUOTE] It gets us everywhere! Because we're not wasting time researching impossibilities.
The idea itself seems far-fetched, and I can see how a lot of people think its insane. However like the OP stated we've thought that about a lot of things, and they've happened. I personally am in no place to talk when saying 'That's impossible' since one day, I could be proven wrong. Not to mention if we were to limit ourselves to words such as No and impossible, well we wouldn't be getting to far now would we? On a larger scale at least.
[QUOTE=Victor Leferve;15993102]It get us EVERYWHERE! Because we're not wasting time researching impossibilities.[/QUOTE] You're an idiot.
[QUOTE=Doriol;15993109]You're an idiot.[/QUOTE] Explain?
[QUOTE=Victor Leferve;15993125]In many ways, but not with science. Explain?[/QUOTE] "The earth is round!" "No, that is impossible."
If teleportation through copying each atom and whatever was real, think about this. Sure, let's say that there was something that could make an exact copy of your body. So you step into Point A, and it creates a carbon copy of you at Point B. But does this mean that you yourself are sent to Point A? No, it just means that there is now a copy of you, a copy that thinks that the teleportation proceeded successfully since the copy would obviously be in Point B. But what of the real one at Point A? Well, you can't have two of the same people, so one of them has to be eliminated. I'm pretty sure Star Trek explained it like this.
[QUOTE=Victor Leferve;15993102]It get us EVERYWHERE! Because we're not wasting time researching impossibilities.[/QUOTE] hahahahahhhhaahahahhahahhahahhahaha oh god i want to see this guy back in the 1940's Oh my gawd guys, we found a physical anomaly that may allow us to generate energy by splitting an atom what get the fuck out of here no i'm serious look hey, get fuck out, we shouldn't waste our time on stupid shit, what is this, generating electricty? there's nothing smaller than an atom fuck you but what about quarks quark smark get your electron shit out of here
[QUOTE=Doriol;15993142]"The earth is round!" "No, that is impossible."[/QUOTE] Thats completely different. That happened hundreds of years ago. The 'round Earth deniers' had no evidence of the Earth being round. I have evidence of teleportation being illogical.
[QUOTE=Victor Leferve;15993248]Thats completely different. That happened hundreds of years ago. I have evidence of teleportation being illogical.[/QUOTE] Yes, but it still happened. You think you have evidence of teleportation being an impossibility. You could be, and most likely are, wrong.
[QUOTE=Victor Leferve;15993248] I have evidence of teleportation being illogical.[/QUOTE] unless you have a fucking degree in physics let us keep the benefit of the doubt
[QUOTE=thisispain;15993198]hahahahahhhhaahahahhahahhahahhahaha oh god i want to see this guy back in the 1940's Oh my gawd guys, we found a physical anomaly that may allow us to generate energy by splitting an atom what get the fuck out of here no i'm serious look hey, get fuck out, we shouldn't waste our time on stupid shit, what is this, generating electricty? there's nothing smaller than an atom fuck you but what about quarks quark smark get your electron shit out of here[/QUOTE] What? read the post I was responding to. He said: "While we may not get teleportation, we can work towards it anyways." That is idiotic, why spend resources and time on something which we cannot achieve.
[QUOTE=Victor Leferve;15993308] That is idiotic, why spend resources and time on something which we cannot achieve.[/QUOTE] You continue to prove that you have no idea what you're talking about and are a complete idiot. It's so delicious.
[QUOTE=Doriol;15993272]Yes, but it still happened. You think you have evidence of teleportation being an impossibility. You could be, and most likely are, wrong.[/QUOTE] The evidence is obvious and takes no 'degree' to notice. Lets take every proposed method. You cannot deconstruct an object's atoms, move, then reconstruct them at a different point, without them being mixed up or altered in some way, not to mention killing the person being teleported. I can't believe I'm explaining this. You cannot teleport someone by time travelling to another spot because in order to time travel you'd need to go faster than the speed of light, which is also impossible. And you cannot teleport by using a Delorian. Okay?
[QUOTE=Victor Leferve;15992175]Nothing that has previously existed, currently exists or is going to exist has the power required to teleport anything. Fact.[/QUOTE] The world is flat. Fact. (oh wait)
[QUOTE=Galago;15993440]The world is flat. Fact. (oh wait)[/QUOTE] Don't jump on the bandwagon.
Teleportation: Send DNA to teleporter B from teleporter A Generate clone Take consciousness from original body and put in clone delete the original body Simple.
[QUOTE=dryer-lint;15992133]More like 88 petabytes.[/QUOTE] Thats what we can use the moon for a mass storage device :D
[QUOTE=Victor Leferve;15993397]The evidence is obvious and takes no 'degree' to notice. Lets take every proposed method. You cannot deconstruct an object's atoms, move, then reconstruct them at a different point, without them being mixed up or altered in some way, not to mention killing the person being teleported. And you cannot teleport by using a Delorian. Okay?[/QUOTE] They didn't think you could split atoms, either. Also, way to be a condescending asshole.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.