do the Colt Police Positive or Smith & Wesson M&P (revolver)
Do the M79
Already did it.
If I put a combat knife on a crossbow, would that count as a fantastic firearm?
Have you done guns hidden in things like suitcases and guitar cases.
[QUOTE=cornndog;17380579]Have you done guns hidden in things like suitcases and guitar cases.[/QUOTE]
Oh man I had a dream last night where I was in a Mariachi band and we had a shootout in a police station with the Spanish Mafia.
[QUOTE=Bean-O;17380563]Already did it.[/QUOTE]
Dammit, how about the SRAW?
How do I make my gun shoot lightning?
how do i shot web
You could write an article on some military tactic. You had one on the blitzkrieg, but there weren't many others. Maybe the development of modern warfare or something along those lines?
[QUOTE=cornndog;17380579]Have you done guns hidden in things like suitcases and guitar cases.[/QUOTE]
Would probably be cool to if he did some on some weird weapons. Like that pen gun.
[QUOTE=DrMortician;17366970]M&P series?
Hahahaha.... Not to mention the .40 is a pretty bleh round as well. The only positive thing about it is that it's easy to convert a .40 to .357sig.[/QUOTE]
I have one and it's probably one of the best pistols I've ever had. Only have it jam once and I've probably fired 600 rounds through it.
Gewehr 1871
Gewehr 1888
M95 Steyr Mannlicher
Mac 10-11-11/9 (yes, I think it deserves a mention, it's a wonderfully modular SMG, sees lots of use in SMG tournaments, has seen lots of use outside of America in special forces units, was almost adopted as a standard sidearm by the US Military, is incredibly cheap and is, believe it or not, reliable as hell as long as you don't use the shitty plastic "Zytel" mags)
Mondragon
AG-42 Ljungman
Carcano M91 and M38 (rifle used to assassinate JFK)
I can keep going.
So, japanese weapons during ww2 are FUCKING CRAPPY right?
[QUOTE=ray243;17381128]So, japanese weapons during ww2 are FUCKING CRAPPY right?[/QUOTE]
No, the Type 99 has the strongest action of any bolt action rifle of the time. The pistols, the Nambu and the Type 94, weren't great, but they weren't too bad either, they were serviceable.
The various LMGs they used in the war, the Type 03/92, the Type 11, and the Type 99, though the 92 and the 99 were based off other designs (the French Hotchkiss and the Czech CZ 30 or English Bren, in that order), they were very reliable, very good firearms.
Speaking of which, has he done the Type 99 and the Type 38?
[QUOTE=mugofdoom;17381192]No, the Type 99 has the strongest action of any bolt action rifle of the time. The pistols, the Nambu and the Type 94, weren't great, but they weren't too bad either, they were serviceable.
The various LMGs they used in the war, the Type 03/92, the Type 11, and the Type 99, though the 92 and the 99 were based off other designs (the French Hotchkiss and the Czech CZ 30 or English Bren, in that order), they were very reliable, very good firearms.
Speaking of which, has he done the Type 99 and the Type 38?[/QUOTE]
But, they were much worse than the allied weapons in any way. Their guns got really weird designs, and the handgun used for tank crews could fire without warning.
[QUOTE=ray243;17381585]But, they were much worse than the allied weapons in any way. Their guns got really weird designs, and the handgun used for tank crews could fire without warning.[/QUOTE]
Nothing fires without warning. You could press the sear trip in on the side really hard and make it fire without touching the trigger, but it didn't fire without warning.
The Type 94 Pistol would be the only gun I'd call shitty, the Nambu is bad, but it works. The Type 11 has a self lubricating system that caused it to jam if it wasn't properly cared for, but it wasn't a bad design at all, and the Type 94 pistol could be discharged without touching the trigger, but that's it.
[QUOTE=mugofdoom;17381785]Nothing fires without warning. You could press the sear trip in on the side really hard and make it fire without touching the trigger, but it didn't fire without warning.[/QUOTE]
He means it can fire without user input, such as while in holster and not being held by user.
Warning isn't the best word for this situation, I agree.
[QUOTE=Deadoon v.2;17381857]He means it can fire without user input, such as while in holster and not being held by user.
Warning isn't the best word for this situation, I agree.[/QUOTE]
[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WpG3cMVVS58&feature=related[/media]
Like in this video.
Did you already cover the first semi-auto shotgun?
118)M95 Steyr Mannlicher
[img]http://world.guns.ru/rifle/steyr_m95_r_f.jpg[/img]
We are all familiar with the Mauser 98 and its sphere of influence circa the turn of the century. But there was another design, the Steyr Mannlicher, which was of Austro-Hungarian origin.
It is the brainchild of Ferdinand Ritter von Mannlicher who experimented with various early semi-automatic rifles in the late 1880's to the turn of the century. His designs would inspire the M-1 Garand and M-1 Carbine but it is his invention of the en-bloc clip that so greatly contributed to the M95 Steyr Mannlicher. In this design you have 5 rounds held together with one clip which you insert into the gun. When the last round is chambered the clip falls out of a slot in the bottom of the gun which is much faster than the more conventional stripper clip and internal magazine systems in use at the time.
He patented this clip system in 1885 and created his first strait-pull rifle a year earlier than that. With a strait-pull the entire act of pulling a bolt up, back, forward and down was replaced with a faster system where you simply pulled back and forth. Other designs such as the K31 and Ross would later utilize the same concept. Early combinations of these two concepts were ill-fated due to a weak wedge-locking system. It wasn't until the 1890s that he implemented more conventional dual locking lugs which essentially turned into the M95 Steyr Mannlicher.
This design was originally adopted in 8x50mmR, a caliber dating back to black powder days. These rifles were used by Austria-Hungary during WW1, rather than the more famous Mauser. After the war ended booth Austria and Hungary continued to use them, although during the inter-war years many were converted to a newer and more powerful 8x56mmR round which was introduced by a machine gun. By that time more than 3 million were made. This doesn't count rifles such as the Italian Mannlicher-Carcano which borrowed concepts (in that case the en-bloc clips).
Captured Steyr Mannlicher rifles were used extensively by Romania in WW2. Other countries (including Germany) used them as well, sometimes rechambered for the more common 8mm Mauser although that conversion often involved the en-bloc clip system being replaced by a more conventional internal magazine.
The weapon itself in notably fast to fire, although the severe recoil of the large bullet makes a very high rate of fire a daunting task for most. As well as standard infantry versions, carbine, cavalry and sniper variants were issued.
It wasn't a perfect rifle however. There is severe bullet drop, requiring the gun to be aimed up quite a bit if the target is beyond 300 or so meters. Recoil is fierce, especially with carbine and Cavalry variants. Also the slot at the bottom of the gun for the en-bloc clips to drop out is a magnet for dirt, especially when the weapon is fired from a prone position. Another problem plagued the much sought-after 8mm Mauser conversions where the extractors are prone to failure. This relegated those rifles to rear-echelon service.
As stated, these disadvantages didn't stop 3 million such rifles from being made. In fact so prolific was this design that examples were seen in service with African guerillas as late as the 1970's and 1980's. Today they are widely available as military surplus firearms within the US and abroad, although the ammunition is somewhat tougher to come by.
Maybe you should branch out more into explosives and other weapons.
[QUOTE=40kplayer;17383278]Maybe you should branch out more into explosives and other weapons.[/QUOTE]
C4, maybe?
this might not have changed the world or anything, but can you do it anyway?
kel-tec's su-16, preferably c model
do somethinf off [url]http://horstheld.com[/url]
Do you use like wikipedia or something
I've always like mortars.
[QUOTE=Tyler72493;17386606]I've always like mortars.[/QUOTE]
Except that it get blown up sometimes as well
[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7C65foMcbMM[/media]
Have you done the AS-50 ?
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
