Fantastic Firearms Part 2 - General

CZ FTMFW. [img]http://dl-client.getdropbox.com/u/49917/gunstuff/pn/CZ75B.jpg[/img] Thanks for doing a write up on it. I did a video about the features and stuff of the CZ if anyone wants to see it. [url]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0823DhcQ9tI[/url]

CZ-75 is shite BHP 4 Lyf

Browning hi power. Forever living in the shadow of the 1911.

Hey Bean-o, maybe you could do a quick biography on John Browning?

RAAC is starting to import 5.45 Saigas and they should start going on sale any time now of course that's what they said 6 months ago but this time Arsenal has a 5.45 converted Saiga for sale...

66)FN-49 [img]http://world.guns.ru/rifle/fn49_2.jpg[/img] Today's rifle is a semi-automatic battle rifle and indeed among the last of it's breed. While it was quite successful and by all means a thoroughly excellent design the timing was somewhat unfortunate, as we shall see. Back in the late 1930's various semi-automatic battle rifles were seeking adoption around the world. Initial skepticism of the utility of allowing the average soldier in the field a greater rate of fire was waning, governments were becoming interested and numerous designs such as the M1 Garand and SVT-40 were already in development if not already adopted. So FN decided to give it a shot. Development on what would later become known as the FN-49 began, like I said in the late 1930's. FN turned to Dieudonne Saive, already a firearm designing legend for finishing the late John Browning's Hi-Power concept. This created one of the more interesting riddles of the gun world. The FN-49, operationally is very similar to the Tokarev SVT-40 which was also being designed at the time. There is speculation that Saive had access to such a weapon but because it too was in the prototype stage at the time this is questionable. Either he based it off the soviet prototype or he simply had the same mind as Tokarev. The world may never know. But it wasn't meant to be. The war started before he could complete his design. Germany swiftly overran and occupied Belguim. Since the Germans had no interest in continuing a program for a semi-automatic rifle Dieudonne's project was shelved. Once the Germans were beaten back it was finished and swiftly released. It was successful but sadly this design missed the train. The FN-49, while it was adopted by Belgium, Egypt, Argentina and Brazil to name a few countries missed out on the chance to see service in the most decisive conflict of its time. It was a very successful design, selling well with the aforementioned countries as well as numerous civilian sales in spite of a somewhat steep price tag. But it was too late. Semi-automatic battle rifles had come and were already being phased out at that point. While it was offered in 8mm Mauser, 30.06 and 7.65x57mm NATO was trying to adopt a new standard caliber which was 7.62x51mm. By the time they finally made up their minds to do that, FN had already developed the 49's direct descendant, the FAL. It was thus rendered obsolete. Well, not entirely. While FN no longer made this rifle they made enough that they still saw service in some countries up until 1988. Many Argentinian rifles were converted to .308, sometimes with removable 20 round magazines. They were also used as sniper rifles and the like, sometimes in their original calibers. What made it better is the fact that by any standard the 49 is an excellent design. It is impeccably well-made, supremely accurate and reliable as well as packing the solid punch of the 7.62 NATO round, which is if the person on the receiving end is lucky. A number remain slowly rusting in weapons lockers here and there. The old workhorse along with it's various calibers seldom sees much service today. But this means that numerous surplus rifles ended up on the civilian market around the world for very competitive prices, often having seen very little use. It remains a bargain for hunters or civilian shooters seeking a reliable and high-quality semi-automatic or a handsome addition to many a collector's arsenal.

Nice article!

You mentioned Argentina twice, you duffer.

[QUOTE=Exalion;15991664]You mentioned Argentina twice, you duffer.[/QUOTE] Fixed, thanks for pointing that out. I should write this stuff earlier in the day when I'm not half-asleep. Or poisoned by expired granola bars.

[QUOTE=jgerm529;15946322]I'm glad I live in America I fell bad for you British gun owners. But anyways fuck non-lethal If anyone ever breaks into my house they'll be stairing down the bayonett and barrel of my M91-30 Mosin-Nagant. I live in NY and if you don't kill the intruder you can be arrested for intent of lethal force. Even if you only have a shotgun with bean-bag rounds. The intruder can say he felt his life was in danger and you, the victim can go to jail.[/QUOTE] Why do you plan to use a long barreled, high-powered, bolt-action rifle for home defense? Just asking. Although the bayonet is a nice touch, I'd imagine it'd be difficult to use (unless you'd practiced with it.) [editline]12:47AM[/editline] [QUOTE=zerglingv2;15955280]You could always try it with .22's instead of bb's haha.[/QUOTE] I don't know the reasons as to why or why not (I have guesses) that wouldn't work, but that seems rather far fetched.

[QUOTE=hurts;15991866]Why do you plan to use a long barreled, high-powered, bolt-action rifle for home defense? Just asking. Although the bayonet is a nice touch, I'd imagine it'd be difficult to use (unless you'd practiced with it.)[/QUOTE] Because he's a bonafide badass :rolleyes: How many of you actually think you'll be prepared when the time comes for home defense? Having the arms is one thing, being prepared is whole different ballgame. It's a common trait in us males especially to think that in a real situation we'll be ready for anything and we'll do what we need to do, but when the chips are down most people don't. Honestly, I would suggest to many of you, that next time instead of saving up for kickass firearm you've been waiting for to add to your already impressive collection, instead spend the money on any number of the impressive gunfighting schools that are going at the moment. Shooting static targets under calm conditions at the range for fun is not training, and it will not prepare you.

Have you thought about doing the Mk 2 grenade? [editline]02:37AM[/editline] Also, what about the FN Minimi/M249?

Huh, that article was the first on a weapon I've never even heard of before.

Where's the P226

[QUOTE=JeRK;15996729]Where's the P226[/QUOTE] off being terribleee

[QUOTE=DualReaver;15996743]off being terribleee[/QUOTE] Having QC issues and only coming with 1 new magazine while still demanding a premium.

67)Hi-Point 995 Carbine [img]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/b/bd/Hp995carbine2.jpg[/img] While there is much speculation and debate among gun owners about the merits of Hi-Point's pistols there is little debate that their first product, the 995 carbine is an excellent design for its intended purpose. In simple terms the 995 is an advent of the federal assault weapons ban which was enacted in the 1990's. It lacks many of the various features associated with all the "scary" rifles and comes with a 10 round magazine. In operation it is a 9x19mm semi-automatic rifle with a simple blowback-operated mechanism. Not exactly rocket science. The real genius is in the way Hi-Point did it. Since the 995 represents a concept meant to fill the void caused by the then-banned UZI and MAC rifles they could have made it very expensive. But instead of trying to make a whole lot of money for every gun they sell, they adopted a different strategy. Just have a very simple inexpensive gun that works great, cut every possible corner in the production stage and sell it for the lowest price possible while still earning a profit. But they didn't stop there. Hi-Point offered and continues to offer a life-time warranty for every gun they make. That means that if you have one and it's b0rked, you send it in for repairs and they'll fix it up for you free of charge. Even if you're not the original owner. This way they tackled some of the skepticism they would expect to be levied against such an inexpensive (and let's admit it, very ugly) weapon. Predictably this was a recipe for success. While it was still very ugly, it offered a decent 9mm rifle for often under 200$. There aren't many .22lr rifles that are that cheap. People really liked this thing too. It was swiftly reported to be highly reliable, many claim to have fired thousands of rounds through it with no malfunctions. Many also claim that for a 9mm rifle it is reasonably accurate as well. Overall an excellent range toy or a plinker if you have tons of 9mm ammo sitting around. It also presents an interesting concept for self-defense. Since it fires the 9mm it doesn't penetrate too many layers of drywall or bark like a rifle, but it is still very easy to control. At the same time it has significantly more range than a handgun which is ideal if you have a spacious property. The menacing and ugly appearance also scores a few points in the intimidation department. Overall 200$ for all this and a bag of chips swiftly earned the 995 a healthy following. It sold almost 30,000 rifles in 1998 alone. But it gets better. Hi-Point later announced a version chambered in .40 S&W called the 4095. It too sold very well. A series of handguns followed soon after and it was found that although Hi-Point never mentioned it in their marketing the magazines between the .40 caliber pistol and rifle are interchangeable. While the 9mm pistol can take the rifle's magazines but not vice-versa. In all both guns represent a wonderful bargain and are still widely available to various civilian shooters today. They are prized by their customers for the low price, the wonderful reliability, the unbeatable warranty and as a result of these merits an aftermarket has formed to cater to the numerous 995 and 4095 owners. A company called ATI manufactures replacement stocks that make the gun resemble the Beretta Storm. With the death of the assault weapons ban 15 round magazines have also become available, although Hi-Point still only sells 10-rounders. On the other side of the coin it was never marketed to either military or law enforcement which would have relatively little use for such a weapon. It has also been seen as a target for occasional firearm legislation due to its appearance which is often mistaken for an assault rifle and due to its prolific nature. There was also much outrage when one was used in the infamous Columbine shooting. In simple terms it is a cheap, ugly although relatively good knockabout plinker. Nothing more, nothing less. It isn't a world-beater and it isn't a name associated with many romantic notions. But there's no denying that it's a success.

Bean-O is it true that you can take the stock off a thompson with a button on the stock itself?

I bet Bean-O's total amount of Informatives is way over 9000... hurr-durr

[QUOTE=ParsonNathaniel;16013439]Bean-O is it true that you can take the stock off a thompson with a button on the stock itself?[/QUOTE] The 1928 has a button, the M1 has a screw or two that you have to remove.

[QUOTE=Bean-O;15946597]In that case I fe[b]e[/b]l bad for New Yorkers. I'd rather have the option of scaring away an intruder than being forced by poorly written laws to kill them. Then again it's probably not just New York. I heard there are similar legal clusterfucks in random jurisdictions within the US. Also Mosin Nagants aren't that great for home defense. Too much power, too unwieldy and the rate of fire is too slow. The rifle bullet could also penetrate the intruder, your wall, your neighbor's wall, your neighbor and just about anything else. Where that bullet will go after it has done it's job is a good thing to consider.[/QUOTE] Agreed. The Mosin Nagant is TERRIBLE HOME DEFENSE WEAPON. [editline]01:45PM[/editline] [QUOTE=Linelor;15955185]Rk. 62, seriously. [img]http://tietokannat.mil.fi/kalustoesittely/media/1113200146_IMG_7345.jpg[/img][/QUOTE] Yes, the RK. 62 is fucking awesome.

[QUOTE=professional;15993009]Because he's a bonafide badass :rolleyes: How many of you actually think you'll be prepared when the time comes for home defense? Having the arms is one thing, being prepared is whole different ballgame. It's a common trait in us males especially to think that in a real situation we'll be ready for anything and we'll do what we need to do, but when the chips are down most people don't. Honestly, I would suggest to many of you, that next time instead of saving up for kickass firearm you've been waiting for to add to your already impressive collection, instead spend the money on any number of the impressive gunfighting schools that are going at the moment. Shooting static targets under calm conditions at the range for fun is not training, and it will not prepare you.[/QUOTE] Well I don't know about you or them but I've had plenty of close-call home defense situations. Wouldn't really rattle me much at this point. And if you use a shotgun for home defense, you don't need that much practice as long as you know your pattern and how to aim.

I love how everyone is bashing me over things I have already explained that they just haven't read yet. Now once again I will say I like my Mosin for home defense because of the bayonet. I don't have to worry about hitting someone else because I have 1 neighbor and he's across the road, the opposite direction I would be shooting. Everything else surrounding my house is either fields or woods. I also have a 12ga. Remington 11-87 I have loaded with Buck-shot for home defense.

Bean-O, have you considered doing the FN Minimi? I'd say it's pretty widespread.

[QUOTE=Prismatex;16022731]Bean-O, have you considered doing the FN Minimi? I'd say it's pretty widespread.[/QUOTE] It's been on the to-do list since the beginning but I've kept putting it off. I'll definitely get around to it eventually though.

[QUOTE=Prismatex;15993470]Have you thought about doing the Mk 2 grenade?[/QUOTE] I support this idea, how about some grenades Bean-O? I bet there's some out there deserving a mention. Maybe just an article about grenades in general, best way to clear a room full of baddies.

Oh, the Accuracy International Arctic Warfare series of rifles are widely used by both militaries and police.

I used my Ross Rifle today, and the bolt didn't fly out and kill me! [img]http://d2k5.com/sa_emots/emot-buddy.gif[/img]

I saw an FAL at my local gunstore for a thousand bucks. Good deal? Of course I have nowhere near the amount of money to buy it, but I'm just curious. It had a nice feel to it, and was quite bulky. How hard is it to find ammunition?

Dude, do an article on some famous/awesome 19th century guns [editline]03:36PM[/editline] like a volcanic or henry or winchester or a revolver or something