[QUOTE=Rebi;31285740]I think a guy in Israel, knows more about Israel than you do.[/QUOTE]
right and there's no such thing as people being outspoken about sexism in israel
when i google sexism in israel there aren't any articles that discuss sexism in israel at all
[QUOTE=thisispain;31285634]is that a joke?[/QUOTE]
Sorry, fixed myself.
Ignore that as you wish.
I really agree with this, especially the part about feminism.
It's so controversial, I mean "Men and women gotta be equal! But a man can't hit a woman but the other way around is fine!" etc. etc.
I can understand the motion, equality and all, but how about making stuff equal then? Instead of "equal"
[QUOTE=Mrfantasticool;31286225]I really agree with this, especially the part about feminism.
It's so controversial, I mean "Men and women gotta be equal! But a man can't hit a woman but the other way around is fine!" etc. etc.
I can understand the motion, equality and all, but how about making stuff equal then? Instead of "equal"[/QUOTE]
this is exactly what i'm talking about
is fucking equality really being allowed to hit people?
fun fact, you aren't allowed to hit anyone man or woman. it's a crime!
[QUOTE=thisispain;31286259]this is exactly what i'm talking about
is fucking equality really being allowed to hit people?
fun fact, you aren't allowed to hit anyone man or woman. it's a crime![/QUOTE] But socially a women can get away with hitting a man.
[QUOTE=imasillypiggy;31286287]But socially a women can get away with hitting a man.[/QUOTE]
right but who says it's completely fine?
that's totally made up what does that add to the conversation
[QUOTE=Corey_Faure;31282551]This guy has a point that no one else I know IRL shares agreement with me. Here's another example of how feminists have reversed the look of things.
How people define obsession of sex between males and females on the Urban Dictionary:
Usual definition of [b]Pervert[/b]:
A guy who is obsessed with sex. (pretty much always used in a derogative form.)
Usual definition of [b]Nymphomaniac[/b]:
A girl who is obsessed with sex. (every time this is defined, they add "but the girl isn't a slut or anything, she's a perfectly normal person" after it)[/QUOTE]
I don't think that Perversion is the same thing as obsession with sex.
I think it's more like obsession with anything sexual.
Voyers are a good example of "perverts" who are not actually after sex, but rather the naked body of a woman. They are the ones who try to sneak peek womens dressing rooms and install hidden cameras to public showers. They want to see some skin. Not the ordinary posed plastic dolls you see on the internet. What they want to see is an every day woman in the most natural form she can be. Naked.
Not saying that all voyers are just after the rush that comes when you secretly spy a woman taking a shower. Some might be after sex, but not all.
I also think that Nymphomaniac is a unisex term. Men can be nymphs just like a woman can, but do men get that understanding shoulder when they tell about it? No, they're labeled as a fucking pervert.
You make a good point none the less even though it was a bit inaccurate IMO.
I normally don't like this guy, but in this video he made a few very good points.
[QUOTE=thisispain;31284414]the amazing atheist isn't clever nor an intellectual. he's just a angry asshole who hates everything and he reflects the userbase that subscribe to him.
[/QUOTE]
I agree, you will begin to see this after watching a few of his videos, he is almost as bad as RWJ.
The sexism thing is a complicated subject, there are a lot of double standards, like circumcision.
[QUOTE=snowzombeh;31288257]Funy how there is always [B]one[/B] dumb rating on a good video.[/QUOTE]
Because TAA is dumb, also lol ratings.
This "It's only sexists while men do it / It's only racists when whites do it" -stuff reminds me of a picture in old LMAO-pics thread where there was a black man hung or something, and the poster got banned for racism. Then someone photoshopped the guy to be a white man and he didn't get banned until people started shouting "What the fuck is this? I DEMAND EQUALITY!" and such.
And it's true. Woman beating a man to hospital -> The man is pathetic and weak and people laugh about it. Man beats a woman to hospital -> Man is the worst person in the world and gets sentenced for life.
Same goes for white people calling blacks the n-word and black people calling white people crackers. I'm scared to actually type the n-word, I may get banned for racism. Cracker is fine, though.
less agreeing.
he clearly isn't speaking on behalf of all men because as we all know there are are all kinda different sorts of men. some of who do all kinda nasty shit we read on the news every other day anyway.
same goes for women, but not as often i think
[QUOTE=thisispain;31284700] you don't solve misandry with blatant misogyny![/QUOTE]
Didn't you say that it's women's turn to be sexists in one thread? Even if not, right now you are ok with misandry fighting misogyny.
[QUOTE=thisispain;31285166]TAA doesn't care about male sexism else he'd talk about shit that's relevant and have an honest conversation[/QUOTE]
He was talking about the double standard, that it's perfectly OK to talk about something on tv but if it was the other way around it would create a massive scandal. Yep, totally irrelevant.
[QUOTE=thisispain;31286259]this is exactly what i'm talking about
is fucking equality really being allowed to hit people?
fun fact, you aren't allowed to hit anyone man or woman. it's a crime![/QUOTE]
You are so dumb, holy shit. You fight off your own fucking arguments. thisispain#1 "is fucking equality really being allowed to hit people?" thisispain#2 "you aren't allowed to hit anyone man or woman. it's a crime! both should be treated in the same way"
Also your point is fucking retarded. "Sexism against men is okay because there is much more sexism against women". How about equality? You don't solve misogyny by blatant mysandry either. Every case of sexism should be dealt with the same way. Equality = no double standards. But you have one of those "feminist retardation" cases when you are ok with double standards if they are good for women but scream "SEXISM" at the opposite. You don't want equality.
Funny how there is always [B]one[/B] dumb rating on a good video.
a woman rated it dumb
-double post-
[editline]23rd July 2011[/editline]
wait, what the fuck
[QUOTE=peaceful guy;31278517]This?[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AeadI7jieDY[/media]makes me sick watching it[/QUOTE]
Yeah, imagine if there were two 15 year old guys and one 9 year old girl.
Its only sexist when men do it.
I clicked the 'Agree' rating so hard that my finger went through my mouse and desk.
It got me so fucking mad when one of the co-hosts actually spewed some sense and then Sharon Osbourne said "BUT IT'S DIFFERENT HURDUR" and everyone laughed and inferred their concurrence.
[QUOTE=thisispain;31286522]right but who says it's completely fine?
that's totally made up what does that add to the conversation[/QUOTE][media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sWS-FoXbjVI[/media]
[QUOTE=Silly Sil;31288187]Didn't you say that it's women's turn to be sexists in one thread? Even if not, right now you are ok with misandry fighting misogyny. [/QUOTE]
uh, no, like i already said if we wanna talk about misandry lets talk about circumcision and domestic abuse.
[QUOTE=Silly Sil;31288187]was talking about the double standard, that it's perfectly OK to talk about something on tv but if it was the other way around it would create a massive scandal. Yep, totally irrelevant. [/QUOTE]
and failed to note that standard the other way around happening all the time. is there no pornography on TV? where are these double standards when i see misogyny in commercials all the time.
[QUOTE=Silly Sil;31288187]You are so dumb, holy shit. You fight off your own fucking arguments. thisispain#1 "is fucking equality really being allowed to hit people?" thisispain#2 "you aren't allowed to hit anyone man or woman. it's a crime! both should be treated in the same way"[/QUOTE]
that's not even a coherent insult. equality doesn't equate to being able to hit whoever you want and it's not like you are allowed to hit anyone. way2go calling someone dumb when you display zero reading aptitude.
[QUOTE=Silly Sil;31288187]Also your point is fucking retarded. "Sexism against men is okay because there is much more sexism against women". How about equality? You don't solve misogyny by blatant mysandry either. Every case of sexism should be dealt with the same way. Equality = no double standards. But you have one of those "feminist retardation" cases when you are ok with double standards if they are good for women but scream "SEXISM" at the opposite. You don't want equality.[/QUOTE]
when did i even say that, you are putting words in my mouth that i fought against posts ago.
how on earth you get around screaming insults? if your point is that there's more male sexism than female sexism that's a lack of observation skills or just purposefully nativity both of which are amazingly damaging to fighting male sexism.
and you've thrown around so many insults at the end of your post that it's stopped being an argument and started being a schoolboy lashing when he doesn't like something. stay in school kid.
[QUOTE=thisispain;31294119]uh, no, like i already said if we wanna talk about misandry lets talk about circumcision and domestic abuse.[/QUOTE]
What? We are talking about double standards here. Why change the subject? wtf
[QUOTE=thisispain;31294119]and failed to note that standard the other way around happening all the time. is there no pornography on TV? where are these double standards when i see misogyny in commercials all the time. [/QUOTE]
You see tv shows where guys giggle about cutting off woman's tits and throwing them into garbage disposal all the time? Are you mad?
Plus don't sexist against women displays create scandals? Why accept it the other way?
[QUOTE=thisispain;31294119]that's not even a coherent insult. equality doesn't equate to being able to hit whoever you want and it's not like you are allowed to hit anyone. way2go calling someone dumb when you display zero reading aptitude.[/QUOTE]You are not coherent, you didn't understand ANYTHING from that argument from the start. Talk about reading aptitude. Lmao.
Exactly, equality doesn't equate to being able to hit whoever you want, one way or the other. Woman hitting a man should be treated the same as a man hitting a woman, that would be equality. While in reality it's nowhere like that. You said yourself that women get away with it. Do you understand the point now?
[QUOTE=thisispain;31294119]when did i even say that, you are putting words in my mouth that i fought against posts ago. [/QUOTE]
You said
[QUOTE=thisispain;31284545]male sexism becomes irrelevant when you consider that men are in power which means they have higher economic mobility and stability[/QUOTE]
You are ok with sexism against males because sexism against women is more damaging. Ridiculous. If it wasn't true you would be equally outraged to this tv show as you'd have been if the situation would be the opposite.
[QUOTE=thisispain;31294119] if your point is that there's more male sexism than female sexism that's a lack of observation skills or just purposefully nativity both of which are amazingly damaging to fighting male sexism.[/QUOTE]
Where the fuck did you get that from? I really have no idea. I've never even thought anything like that. All I'm saying is that there are double standards. Some things are acceptable for women but if men did it, it would create an outrage (see the tv show from op).
[QUOTE=thisispain;31294119]and you've thrown around so many insults at the end of your post that it's stopped being an argument and started being a schoolboy lashing when he doesn't like something. stay in school kid.[/QUOTE]
How many insults did I throw? "you are so dumb" and that you have "feminist retardation". That's 2. If 2 is "many" for you I don't know how much can you count to. Nice way of avoiding the argument. I'll rephrase it for you so you won't be able to pull of that childish trick again.
Also your point is invalid. "Sexism against men is okay because there is much more sexism against women". How about equality? You don't solve misogyny by blatant mysandry either. Every case of sexism should be dealt with the same way. Equality = no double standards. But you have one of those "feminist" syndromes when you are ok with double standards if they are good for women but scream "SEXISM" at the opposite. You don't want equality.
All I'm going to say is that you're both spelling misandry wrong.
Doesn't really matter since thisispain doesn't fucking get it.
[QUOTE=Sylizar;31296391]Doesn't really matter since thisispain doesn't fucking get it.[/QUOTE]
Don't get me wrong, whoever thinks sexism is OK on one gender and not the other, but then argues about equality and the like is completely fucking retarded.
He reminds me of a chubby Adam Savage.
But he definitely does make an excellent point. It's crazy how spot on he is with most of his stuff.
This guy usually rustles my jimmies, but I totally see his point on this.
in the uk we have Loose Woman!
sexist as fuck!
[QUOTE=Armyis1337;31296490]whoever thinks sexism is OK on one gender[/QUOTE]
man fuck this
[editline]23rd July 2011[/editline]
[QUOTE=Silly Sil;31294852]
How many insults did I throw? "you are so dumb" and that you have "feminist retardation". That's 2. If 2 is "many" for you I don't know how much can you count to. [/QUOTE]
uh
Thisispain, I usually find you to be a good poster and so on.
But the last two pages, just skimming over them, I've realized you are full of it.
Bigotry on any level is unacceptable, to ignore sexism directed at men while throwing a fuss about sexism that's directed at women is a double standard, regardless of the circumstances. That's the only point people are trying to make in this thread. To say that sexism against men is irrelevant because of economic and social factors is horse crap.
[QUOTE=ScoutKing;31301977]That's the only point people are trying to make in this thread.[/QUOTE]
no it isn't but whatever
i'm gonna bitch about this until you people get your act together
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
