except i guess the native australians
but they're not really people
[QUOTE=ButtsexV3;37955800]bro its caucasian negroid mongoloid australoid[/QUOTE]
this dude knows what's up
[QUOTE=Klownox;37955815]except i guess the native australians
but they're not really people[/QUOTE]
yes very true
[editline]8th October 2012[/editline]
the people of India are technically australoids too
[QUOTE=ButtsexV3;37955825]yes very true
[editline]8th October 2012[/editline]
the people of India are technically australoids too[/QUOTE]
what about hawaii
hey were described as having dark skin with wavy hair, in the case of Veddoids from Sri Lanka and parts of South Asia and Aboriginal Australians, or hair ranging from straight to kinky in the case of Papuan, Melanesian and Negrito groups.
According to this model of classification, Australoid peoples ranged throughout Indonesia, Malaysia, Australia, New Guinea, Melanesia and India. In the mid-twentieth century, a separate argument emerged that Australoids were linked to Proto-Caucasoids.
hmm
[editline]8th October 2012[/editline]
wait so what are North/Central/South American aboriginals?
it's like i'm on tumbler
[QUOTE=Klownox;37955871]hey were described as having dark skin with wavy hair, in the case of Veddoids from Sri Lanka and parts of South Asia and Aboriginal Australians, or hair ranging from straight to kinky in the case of Papuan, Melanesian and Negrito groups.
According to this model of classification, Australoid peoples ranged throughout Indonesia, Malaysia, Australia, New Guinea, Melanesia and India. In the mid-twentieth century, a separate argument emerged that Australoids were linked to Proto-Caucasoids.
hmm
[editline]8th October 2012[/editline]
wait so what are North/Central/South American aboriginals?[/QUOTE]
mongoloids by most accounts
[QUOTE=thisispain;37955876]it's like i'm on tumbler[/QUOTE]
tumblr is full of porn and kittens for me
seriously, just porn and kittens
[QUOTE=fairy;37955896]tumblr is full of porn and kittens for me
seriously, just porn and kittens[/QUOTE]
where are you finding kittens?
[QUOTE=ButtsexV3;37955897]where are you finding kittens?[/QUOTE]
I follow like 17 people that only post cats
[QUOTE=thisispain;37955876]it's like i'm on tumbler[/QUOTE]
um ok we're just amateur anthropologists ok
[QUOTE=ButtsexV3;37955893]mongoloids by most accounts[/QUOTE]
ah, i figured as much. but they also kind of fit the australoid description
[QUOTE=Klownox;37955946]um ok we're just amateur anthropologists ok
ah, i figured as much. but they also kind of fit the australoid description[/QUOTE]
wait is australoid a real thing
I thought you made that shit up
[QUOTE=fairy;37955985]wait is australoid a real thing
I thought you made that shit up[/QUOTE]
shows what good schools are
i don't get why high schools don't teach physical anthropology.
it's not like it's racist to acknowledge differences in race
they're clearly fucking there
banned for 1 day rofl good job m8
physical anthropology isn't a thing, there's nothing to teach
[QUOTE=thisispain;37956144]physical anthropology isn't a thing, there's nothing to teach[/QUOTE]
rolf
i've studied medicine and we've never even acknowledged such a thing besides genetic dispositions based on ethnicity
seriously the shit you're talking about is like 200 years old and no-one with a brain or an education considers it valid science just a heads up
[QUOTE=thisispain;37956144]physical anthropology isn't a thing, there's nothing to teach[/QUOTE]
traditional physical anthropology maybe but if you treat each race as a basic guideline and just lump everyone in whatever they fit closest to then it works pretty ok
[editline]8th October 2012[/editline]
and we're really just talking about the typological model and not physical anthropology as a whole
The new Melvins album (which came 2 months ago, why didn't I notice fuck) is pretty interesting.
that is traditional physical anthropology
we now know that race was bullshit invented when the understanding of genetics was in its infancy
all humans belong in the exact same subspecies and any variation is based on genetics from environmental factors, race is a poor descriptor and no-one considers it valid science except stormfront
[QUOTE=thisispain;37956171]i've studied medicine and we've never even acknowledged such a thing besides genetic dispositions based on ethnicity
seriously the shit you're talking about is like 200 years old and no-one with a brain or an education considers it valid science just a heads up[/QUOTE]
what does anthropology have to do with medicine
[QUOTE=ButtsexV3;37956182]
and we're really just talking about the typological model and not physical anthropology as a whole[/QUOTE]
well duh physical anthropology is a completely outdated term so obviously it would refer to outdated concepts
what you guys are talking about is basically physiognomy
[QUOTE=thisispain;37956210]that is traditional physical anthropology
we now know that race was bullshit invented when the understanding of genetics was in its infancy
all humans belong in the exact same subspecies and any variation is based on genetics from environmental factors, race is a poor descriptor and no-one considers it valid science except stormfront[/QUOTE]
says who
[QUOTE=Klownox;37956215]what does anthropology have to do with medicine[/QUOTE]
if humans between races had relevant differences then i would think treatment of humans would address those differences, medicine is simply the practice of understandings gained through human physiology.
[QUOTE=thisispain;37956227]what you guys are talking about is basically physiognomy[/QUOTE]
lol talk about straw man
race is a great way to determine what someone looks like and nobody ever mentioned personality
[QUOTE=ButtsexV3;37956233]says who[/QUOTE]
take a basic college course on physiology
[url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biological_anthropology[/url]
you can read the wikipedia page on it too
[QUOTE=thisispain;37956249]take a basic college course on physiology
[url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biological_anthropology[/url]
you can read the wikipedia page on it too[/QUOTE]
there's only one sentence in the whole page that supports anything about it being false
"There have been various attempts to correlate human physique with psychological traits such as intelligence, criminality and personality type, many of which proved themselves mistaken and are now obsolete."
and none of us mentioned intelligence, criminality, or personality until you came in and took a big fat dump on our discussion
[QUOTE=ButtsexV3;37956274]there's only one sentence in the whole page that supports anything about it being false
"There have been various attempts to correlate human physique with psychological traits such as intelligence, criminality and personality type, many of which proved themselves mistaken and are now obsolete."
and none of us mentioned intelligence, criminality, or personality until you came in and took a big fat dump on our discussion[/QUOTE]
your discussion was bad
all hail tip winner of music chat debate
[QUOTE=Klownox;37955871]
According to this model of classification, Australoid peoples ranged throughout Indonesia, Malaysia, [b]Australia[/b], New Guinea, Melanesia and India. In the mid-twentieth century, a separate argument emerged that Australoids were linked to Proto-Caucasoids.
[/QUOTE]
maybe majority of australians, but western australians are a completely different species, Homo habilis that refused to evolve, they live in the desert and tunnel underground to find aluminium (their main food supply), they are agressive against every living creature, especially homo sapiens and they're capable of killing with one punch, but they require large amounts of alcohol before they can perform this native martial art.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
