Something, of course.
Looks good but I'm gonna be stubborn and frown the hell out of those black outlines.
>:(
I guess my main inspiration was this ;
[img]http://images2.wikia.nocookie.net/cnc/images/thumb/d/d5/Wolverine_CC2_Rend1.jpg/300px-Wolverine_CC2_Rend1.jpg[/img]
It's a Wolverine from Command & Conquer - Tiberian Sun
[editline]02:06AM[/editline]
Haha yeah I thought that would be frowned upon, I might give it a try to get some 'regular' outlining on it :)
[QUOTE=KommradKommisar;20328746]Heavy WIP.
I like to reskin things. :downs:
[IMG]http://www.cubeupload.com/files/9a7e00swat.png[/IMG]
Swat with Riot shields and tank. Also with Rubber bullet/tear gas gun.[/QUOTE]
C&C.
They look kinda stiff, the shield looks more like a block than a shield too.
I think you should do a whole new template for the SWAT, the tank is really sexy though except for the guy that's pulling his head outside.
I changed the outlines, and it sure makes it look like something else than the 'original' ;
[img]http://img69.imageshack.us/img69/5240/spritesomething1.png[/img]
[QUOTE=KommradKommisar;20332953]C&C.[/QUOTE]
Maybe you should give credit to the tank's original owner.
Deathstrike?
(I think. :ohdear:)
Is there any tutorial on how to do an explosion? They look really hard to make.
Looking at pictures/videos of explosions and drawing from said reference is the best way to do it.
[QUOTE=Gregah;20333193]They look kinda stiff, the shield looks more like a block than a shield too.
I think you should do a whole new template for the SWAT, the tank is really sexy though except for the guy that's pulling his head outside.
I changed the outlines, and it sure makes it look like something else than the 'original' ;
[img]http://img69.imageshack.us/img69/5240/spritesomething1.png[/img][/QUOTE]
Holy crap :D
I like the ones on the left much better, but both have a certain style, you'll be fine either way.
[editline]08:00PM[/editline]
[QUOTE=Gregah;20333583]Looking at pictures/videos of explosions and drawing from said reference is the best way to do it.[/QUOTE]
I just wanna say something on explosions, what a lot of people don't get is that most explosions aren't all flash and fire. Maybe for the first second, then its all dust, dirt, and debris.
[img]http://t0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:MgDErFuCm3U3WM:http://mocoloco.com/art/archives/pickering_artillery_mar_06.jpg[/img]
For example, that's an artillery shell hitting the ground.
But they look more like explosions if they have fire in them. if its just smoke people will go "Whats that?"
Like in old war movies.
Huge puffs of smoke= death of ten or more.
[QUOTE=$$>MUFFIN<$$;20334231]But they look more like explosions if they have fire in them. if its just smoke people will go "Whats that?"[/QUOTE]
Thank Hollywood for that.
Yeah i know, i made a thread or post about that a couple of months ago and no one though it was a good idea.
[QUOTE=KommradKommisar;20333426]Deathstrike?
(I think. :ohdear:)[/QUOTE]
Its codemonkeys.
Ehe, what? Sorry to correct you but you should find that the Stryker is indeed the old one I created on an ancient Army sheet.
He doesn't have to bother crediting me on that old junker, it's not up to my standards these days so I'm not excactly bothered about it.
[URL=http://filesmelt.com/][IMG]http://filesmelt.com/dl/WWII_British_Sprites11.png[/IMG][/URL]
A Crusader tank
[URL=http://filesmelt.com/][IMG]http://filesmelt.com/dl/Crusader_tank.jpg[/IMG][/URL]
Forget the men, i cant be bothered
CC
looks great.
The main body seems a bit too fat, compared to the picture.
The > one has gotten smaller cuz the the other one was too big
tank at the back seems to far away from the body.
Whaaaa?
the petrol tank or what ever that is at the back is to far from the body of the tank.
[QUOTE=Yuskolov123;20330089][IMG]http://filesmelt.com/dl/Rusky12.png[/IMG]
I present to you, the IS-2, Iosif Stalin Tank. Russian Heavy tank armed with a 122mm Cannon, and armour thicker than that of a Tiger!
Also, a nice Command IS-2 with a Commissar and a Flag Draped over the front
C&C Please![/QUOTE]
If a pixel man is aprox 25 pixels high, those tanks are taller than most modern tanks. Now bare in mind, the T-34 was small: Length: 6.09 meters, Width: 2.98 meters, height: 2.57 meters.
It's shorter both in length and height. And as the tank enthusiast I am, I must say you resembled the T-34 poorly. The only thing I recognize are the bars on the side of it. So as far as constructive criticism goes, make it smaller and more jagged - study alot of pictures from different angle, even if you don't need to since you're only making it from the side. Also include the extrution for the top rear, vents from the engine room. And if you really want that extra star point, make both versions of the T-34 used (the T-34/76 developed in 1940 and the T-34/85 developed in 1944 - the difference being the earlier 76 version had a smaller, welded turret when then later version, 85 kind had a full cast turret).
^This goes for the Iosif Stalin-2 tank aswell. Redo them better for the love of God. The IS-2 Length: 8.32 meters, width: 3.25 meters, height: 2.9 meters (so basically not that much taller than the T-34).
I read in your thread how you were going to do the second world war russkie vehicles, and I was really close to saying "if you don't do the russkie vehicles good, Ima smack you across the face so hard you don't wake up".
So over all it's a good start but you should really consider redoing the vehicles.
Uh-huuuuuh...
And which petrol tank, on the main body or the turret thing
[QUOTE=trifon;20341880]Uh-huuuuuh...
And which petrol tank, on the main body or the turret thing[/QUOTE]
It's actualy a suppliy holder... The round part at the back part of the tank...
The barrel...
[editline]01:35PM[/editline]
[URL=http://www.cubeupload.com][IMG]http://www.cubeupload.com/files/339a00wwiibritishsprites.png[/IMG][/URL]
Better, worse?
[img]http://www.cubeupload.com/files/450400nazi.png[/img]
I didn't get any C&C in the WW2 thread so i'm posting here :keke:
Tanks look fairly bland, and what are they based off?
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
