[QUOTE=squids_eye;34058056]Once a gay person groped my ass while I was pissing in a urinal. Though to be fair I was in a gay bar so it's probably my own fault. I have no problem with gay people aslong as they keep their hands to themselves, but really that applies to straight people too.
Even if it was a choice, I don't see why it should be considered a wrong one.[/QUOTE]
Hold on, if you're not gay, why the hell were you in a gaybar?
I'm confused as to what the debate in here is?
[QUOTE=Broguts;34059225]Hold on, if you're not gay, why the hell were you in a gaybar?[/QUOTE]
what? next you will say that gays can't go to a straight bar!!
(actually, that is kind of weird. why go to a gay bar?)
[QUOTE=Ruzza;34059190]Exactly this, ive had a gay kid at my school show me his dick and asked to see mine, these are the people that make gays look bad[/QUOTE]
No, it makes him look bad. If a straight guy did that to some woman I highly doubt you'd be going on about how it 'makes straights look bad'.
[QUOTE=The Kakistocrat;34059335]what? next you will say that gays can't go to a straight bar!!
(actually, that is kind of weird. why go to a gay bar?)[/QUOTE]
Maybe he was there with a gay friend?
[QUOTE=Broguts;34059225]Hold on, if you're not gay, why the hell were you in a gaybar?[/QUOTE]
It was my girlfriend's friend's birthday and for some reason she wanted to go to a gaybar. It was quite a nice place actually, if you ignore the seminaked cowboys.
[QUOTE=squids_eye;34061434]It was my girlfriend's friend's birthday and for some reason she wanted to go to a gaybar. It was quite a nice place actually, if you ignore the seminaked cowboys.[/QUOTE]
I know a few girls who go to gaybars/clubs when they actually want to just have a fun time out dancing without being hit on by stumbling drunks
this thread convinced me that facepunch is almost entirley gay
[editline]5th January 2012[/editline]
wait should i even be surpirsed
This isn't fast threads
and of course this thread will take attention of homosexual users more than straight
"Haha you support the rights of completely normal people that are discriminated against because of what they're attracted to ya FAGGET"
There isn't anything wrong with gay people at all, If you find someone annoying that's because the person is annoying, It isn't the fault of everyone that's questioned their sexuality because you're annoyed by some guys in a parade. I fail to see how something can be "un-natural". Medicine isn't always natural, Should that be condemned too? Hell, maybe everyone shouldn't wear clothes because they aren't "natural".
Everything on this earth is natural, care to tell me how it isn't?
[QUOTE=squids_eye;34061434]It was my girlfriend's friend's birthday and for some reason she wanted to go to a gaybar. It was quite a nice place actually, if you ignore the seminaked cowboys.[/QUOTE]
Seminaked cowboys, we have that every year here in calgary, it's called the day after stampede end and everyone is drunk.
[QUOTE=FlubberNugget;34064813]Everything on this earth is natural, care to tell me how it isn't?[/QUOTE]
I don't see how the way someone thinks can be "Un-natural". I mean if you had brain surgery to change yourself into a homosexual that might be viewed as un-natural (But that's fucking silly.)
I guess I was Comparing physical objects to human thoughts and emotions so it wasn't a very fitting example.
I like gay people, because chicks don't give you free steam gifts for flashing your genitals.
Homosexuality is a defect of some kind, just like pedophilia.
Humans are nothing more than advanced bacteria whos only purpose is to make more humans.
Homosexuality does not create new humans.
If you do not understand this or accept this truth, then you are ignorant.
However, in todays society we are so intelligent that we outsmart the biological system in some kind of way. So I don't really see anything bad with it.
We are also too many people in this world, so we don't need any more humans. Let the homosexuals have some fun people, peace out.
[QUOTE=Hellstrom;34068562]I like gay people, because chicks don't give you free steam gifts for flashing your genitals.[/QUOTE]
What?
There isn't enough proof to say it's a defect, or that it isn't, as far as I know.
So, it's possible to say: Personal preference isn't a defect.
[QUOTE=Michaeldf;34070282]Homosexuality is a defect of some kind, just like pedophilia.[/QUOTE]
any mutation may be called a defect, therefore humans in general are defects, making the attribution of a purpose to mankind rather pointless
comparing homosexuals to pedophiles can only lead to misconception and false comparisons used to fuel hatred
[QUOTE=Michaeldf;34070282]Homosexuality is a defect of some kind, just like pedophilia.
Humans are nothing more than advanced bacteria whos only purpose is to make more humans.
Homosexuality does not create new humans.
If you do not understand this or accept this truth, then you are ignorant.
However, in todays society we are so intelligent that we outsmart the biological system in some kind of way. So I don't really see anything bad with it.
We are also too many people in this world, so we don't need any more humans. Let the homosexuals have some fun people, peace out.[/QUOTE]
Excuse me? How exactly can you compare homosexuality to pedophilia. Furthermore, its not a defect. There are studies that back up support for brains compared to gay men/straight women being the same size in some part that I forgot about. Not to mention there's also evidence that supports that during pregnancy, younger siblings of other males have a higher chance of being born homosexual. I call that natural, not a defect.
And calling people ignorant for not agreeing to your completely irrational belief is what makes you ignorant.
I think defect was a poor word choice, Its just something different that ticks in peoples heads.
The brain is a fucking confusing piece of art.
[QUOTE=T-Sonar.0;34071558]Excuse me? How exactly can you compare homosexuality to pedophilia. Furthermore, its not a defect. There are studies that back up support for brains compared to gay men/straight women being the same size in some part that I forgot about. Not to mention there's also evidence that supports that during pregnancy, younger siblings of other males have a higher chance of being born homosexual. I call that natural, not a defect.
And calling people ignorant for not agreeing to your completely irrational belief is what makes you ignorant.[/QUOTE]
I believe he simply means that biologically an organisms goal is to survive. Organisms survive by reproducing. Reproducing can not be done when you are homosexual and is there-fore a "defect" in humans.
But yes at this day in age who gives a shit? Being homosexual is A-Okay.
pedophiles are ok too
child molesters aren't though
not that they have to be pedophiles
(they can be anyone)
[QUOTE=MadPro119;34071968]Reproducing can not be done when you are homosexual and is there-fore a "defect" in humans.[/QUOTE]
Which isn't actually true anyway.
As I posted before:
[url]http://scholarworks.uno.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1018&context=econ_wp&sei-redir=1&referer=http%3A%2F%2Fscholar.google.com%2Fscholar_url%3Fhl%3Den%26q%3Dhttp%3A%2F%2Fscholarworks.uno.edu%2Fcgi%2Fviewcontent.cgi%253Farticle%253D1018%2526context%253Decon_wp%26sa%3DX%26scisig%3DAAGBfm2ZvDPlWHkBIiS6bSvSR6R-pkFrwg%26oi%3Dscholarr#search=%22http%3A%2F%2Fscholarworks.uno.edu%2Fcgi%2Fviewcontent.cgi%3Farticle%3D1018%26context%3Decon_wp%22[/url]
There's plenty of academic support that homosexuality aids in survival of the species, just not directly. We're a complicated species. Birth control being more common might not reduce population growth at all, despite being the most obvious way to stop the breeding mechanism. Vaccines might, entirely because longer life span of individual children causes people not to create more to reduce competition. Homosexuality might be a similar mechanism.
Put another way, if it was a "defect", it wouldn't be a prominent part of our species.
[QUOTE=Michaeldf;34070282]Homosexuality is a defect of some kind, just like pedophilia.
Humans are nothing more than advanced bacteria whos only purpose is to make more humans.
Homosexuality does not create new humans.
If you do not understand this or accept this truth, then you are ignorant.
[b]However, in todays society we are so intelligent that we outsmart the biological system in some kind of way.[/b] So I don't really see anything bad with it.
We are also too many people in this world, so we don't need any more humans. Let the homosexuals have some fun people, peace out.[/QUOTE]
If homosexuality is a byproduct of intelligence then why is it observed in over 1500 different species
and if it's biologically unsound, why hasn't natural selection wiped it out in these species
[QUOTE=FlubberNugget;34064813]Everything on this earth is natural, care to tell me how it isn't?[/QUOTE]
This this this this this.
[QUOTE=Zeke129;34077349]If homosexuality is a byproduct of intelligence then why is it observed in over 1500 different species
and if it's biologically unsound, why hasn't natural selection wiped it out in these species[/QUOTE]
Oh and this this this this.
Good point Zeke.
[QUOTE=Scoooby;34079574]This this this this this.
Oh and this this this this.
Good point Zeke.[/QUOTE]
If everything on the world was natural, than what use would we have for the word 'unnatural'?
[QUOTE=DanTehMan;34079636]If everything on the world was natural, than what use would we have for the word 'unnatural'?[/QUOTE]
I don't know. Other shit.
But humanity scrutinizing homosexuality because of religious stigmas doesn't make it unnatural.
An animals sexual behavior is determined by their neurology and biochemistry. It's the same thing with us.
This is understood by looking at things like sweat glans and pheromones.
Cats cum all over their territory to attract females.
If I came all over something I could say the same thing. But the observer is the one calling it unnatural in the first place.
We create social taboos because we're assuming that we're some kind of deviation from the animal kingdom, so we let ourselves get to our head and think we can call things unnatural.
It's not in our hands to determine whether something is inherently unnatural. If it's been occurring for thousands of years, that may be your first hint it's natural.
[QUOTE=Scoooby;34080050]I don't know. Other shit.
But humanity scrutinizing homosexuality because of religious stigmas doesn't make it unnatural.
An animals sexual behavior is determined by their neurology and biochemistry. It's the same thing with us.
This is understood by looking at things like sweat glans and pheromones.
Cats cum all over their territory to attract females.
If I came all over something I could say the same thing. But the observer is the one calling it unnatural in the first place.
We create social taboos because we're assuming that we're some kind of deviation from the animal kingdom, so we let ourselves get to our head and think we can call things unnatural.
It's not in our hands to determine whether something is inherently unnatural. If it's been occurring for thousands of years, that may be your first hint it's natural.[/QUOTE]
This is not the kind of argument you should be making to someone who disagrees with you, though. It's much more difficult for someone to see an entirely different way of thinking, like you're proposing, than to cater to a set of ideals they already have. Some buzzwords like 'equality' or 'equal rights' are something that everyone understands, and are ideals discussed in religious texts and even in governmental texts. Try throwing 'all men are created equal' in their faces and see how they respond.
I think it would be perfectly alright if gay's weren't allowed to get 'married' per say, as long as they were granted partnerships with perfectly equal rights.
[QUOTE=DanTehMan;34079636]If everything on the world was natural, than what use would we have for the word 'unnatural'?[/QUOTE]
Perpetual motion machines are unnatural
So is a gopher travelling twice the speed of light
[QUOTE=DanTehMan;34080362]I think it would be perfectly alright if gay's weren't allowed to get 'married'[/QUOTE]
thanks for sharing
your opinion doesn't matter if you don't explain it and back yourself up
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
