[QUOTE=GoDong-DK;50679584]He looks pretty normal, also he draws naked pictures of underage characters because why not. Don't know what that says about film taste though.[/QUOTE]
what
[QUOTE=Zillamaster55;50679633]what[/QUOTE]
Can't edit the post for some reason, but either way it would appear that the character wasn't meant to be underage, and it was only once.
[QUOTE=Eric95;50679623]taste is universal
didn't mean to derail the thread though, the movie's probably shit
it's just funny how so many of these youtube-era reviewers who act like a bastion of taste look like total neckbeards with no feel for aesthetics whatsoever[/QUOTE]
"wow he has facial hair and doesn't wear $300 glasses, he must arbitrarily like everything I dislike"
[QUOTE=GoDong-DK;50679659]Can't edit the post for some reason, but either way it would appear that the character wasn't meant to be underage, and it was only once.[/QUOTE]
what does this have to do with anything though, what
[QUOTE=Eric95;50679623]taste is universal
didn't mean to derail the thread though, the movie's probably shit
it's just funny how so many of these youtube-era reviewers who act like a bastion of taste look like total neckbeards with no feel for aesthetics whatsoever[/QUOTE]
"taste is universal"
This can't be true, after all you actually made some pretty cool things despite your taste in personality traits being absolutely garbage.
[QUOTE=Eric95;50679465]if you have good taste in movies then you probably have good taste in clothing and haircuts as well, and a good sense of aesthetics
a good life philosophy is to never listen to the recommendations of someone who wears cargo shorts, for example
i have no idea who moviebob is but i google images'd him and i wouldn't follow his recommendations either
or jim sterling[/QUOTE]
That's the most pretentious crap I've read here since that wickedplayer post and that's saying something.
[QUOTE=Steel & Iron;50679140][media]https://twitter.com/the_moviebob/status/751677871140122625[/media]
Yep, yep Movieblob his appearance matters.[/QUOTE]
Why does anybody still pay attention to him?
Frankly the main thing I loathe of this film's creation is it being created in such a manner after Harold Ramis's death. It just should have not been made after his passing as it leaves a taste of bile. At best they should have simply tested the waters with a tv show with the original cast, then consider prospects of a film after reception.
[QUOTE=Zillamaster55;50679679]what does this have to do with anything though, what[/QUOTE]
About as much as fashion taste and your opinions on movies I suppose. It was a dumb jab, I'll admit.
[QUOTE=Eric95;50679623]taste is universal[/QUOTE]
You can't buy other people titles anymore, right?
Asking for a friend.
[QUOTE=bdd458;50679548]If your life philosophy is "wow they dont dress the nicest, they probably have shitty opinions" then you're a shitty judgemental asshole.[/QUOTE]
You're right :)
[QUOTE=Eric95;50679775]It's not about having to "dress nice", it's about not dressing really bad because it proves you have no sense of aesthetics, and because of that aren't someone fit to critic a visual medium. Dressing neutral would be fine[/QUOTE]
are you going to make any actual arguments?
what would you say about the opinions in the video if it was just audio?
[QUOTE=Eric95;50679775]It's not about having to "dress nice", it's about not dressing really bad because it proves you have no sense of aesthetics, and because of that aren't someone fit to critic a visual medium. Dressing neutral would be fine[/QUOTE]
Some people don't give a shit, maybe because they assume that people are able to look beyond their appearance.
[QUOTE=Eric95;50679775]It's not about having to "dress nice", it's about not dressing really bad because it proves you have no sense of aesthetics, and because of that aren't someone fit to critic a visual medium. Dressing neutral would be fine[/QUOTE]
So which arts degree did you graduate with? PhD in Snootology?
[QUOTE=Eric95;50679775]It's not about having to "dress nice", it's about not dressing really bad because it proves you have no sense of aesthetics, and because of that aren't someone fit to critic a visual medium. Dressing neutral would be fine[/QUOTE]
I can't imagine being someone so full of themselves that they think someone who dresses casually or "bad" (because that's not objective, right?) means they apparently can't critique movies.
Holy shit I just realized who you are, are you a movie critic version of the main villain of Ratatouille?!?!?
[QUOTE=Eric95;50679775]It's not about having to "dress nice", it's about not dressing really bad because it proves you have no sense of aesthetics, and because of that aren't someone fit to critic a visual medium. Dressing neutral would be fine[/QUOTE]
I bet you dress like shit.
The best movie reviews are the ones where you look like you're about to do a fast food review in your dimly lit car! :)
[QUOTE=Eric95;50679836]True, but first impressions are important. Looking nice while telling your opinion in a well-produced video gives it legitimacy. Looking like you're a weekend airsofter about to do a fast food review in your dimly lit car doesn't.[/QUOTE]
Well my first impression of you isn't great, got to be honest.
[QUOTE=Eric95;50679232]it kinda does
like, if you look or dress bad then that probably means you have bad taste[/QUOTE]
I've seen stupid and this is pretty high on the amount of stupid I've seen condensed in a single sentence
Particularly when defending movieblob, the human manatee that gives tips to get fit
[QUOTE=Eric95;50679836]Looking nice[/QUOTE]
define "nice"
[QUOTE=Eric95;50679836]gives it legitimacy[/QUOTE]
why?
I hope when you grow up you're never in a position of power over the career prospects of another individual.
[QUOTE=Eric95;50679836]True, but first impressions are important. Looking nice while telling your opinion in a well-produced video gives it legitimacy. Looking like you're a weekend airsofter about to do a fast food review in your dimly lit car doesn't.[/QUOTE]
yeah, it gives it legitimacy to easily impressed dimwits who think someone's personal appearance in any way reflects how intelligent they are or how insightful their critique is
if you aren't a complete mong you should be able to judge someone's words, creations, and ideas on their own merit
[QUOTE=UnidentifiedFlyingTard;50679833]I bet you dress like shit.[/QUOTE]
I was kind of joking, but I went to his twitter and his picture makes him look homeless with that messy hair.
who gives a fuck how anyone dresses you silly bastard.
So basically this movie is just a cheap cash in towards sjws.
who would have guessed
[QUOTE=1nfiniteseed;50679706]Why does anybody still pay attention to him?[/QUOTE]
Same reason people pay attention to guys like Chris-chan.
[QUOTE=Eric95;50679836]True, but first impressions are important. Looking nice while telling your opinion in a well-produced video gives it legitimacy. Looking like you're a weekend airsofter about to do a fast food review in your dimly lit car doesn't.
People like Jim Sterling dress objectively bad lol. Dressing casually is fine, as I said
but no, I'm not a movie critic at all, because I don't feel like I watch enough movies or have enough interest in them to have any authority on them[/QUOTE]
Are you aware what the word "objective" means?
[QUOTE=Oizen;50679871]So basically this movie is just a cheap cash in towards sjws.
who would have guessed[/QUOTE]
Yes, they made this movie to only appeal to a small group of people on the internet.
This is how movies make money, by appealing to as little people as possible.
[QUOTE=UnidentifiedFlyingTard;50679891]Yes, they made this movie to only appeal to a small group of people on the internet.
This is how movies make money, by appealing to as little people as possible.[/QUOTE]
Their marketing campaign that basically amounted to "girlz only, you silly boys :^)" in response to people [i]actually criticizing it[/i] kind of alienated a good 50% of potential moviegoers don't you think?
[QUOTE=Psychopath12;50679902]Their marketing campaign that basically amounted to "girlz only, you silly boys :^)" in response to people [i]actually criticizing it[/i] kind of alienated a good 50% of potential moviegoers don't you think?[/QUOTE]
I feel this probably won't deter generic movie goers.
i'm sure this movie is shit! i haven't seen it, and i'm not going to, but that's my gut feeling and i'm staying with it :)
[highlight](User was banned for this post ("Flaming/Shitpost" - Novangel))[/highlight]
[highlight](User was banned for this post ("Extended due to history" - Novangel))[/highlight]
[QUOTE=Eric95;50679914]stuff[/QUOTE]
i can't fathom that the fashion police actually, unironically, exist in the year of our lord 2016
[B]IN A GHOSTBUSTERS THREAD[/B]
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.