[QUOTE=certified;32672098]
Test #13
Name: Dr. Tendo
Subject: Killzone 2 Multiplayer
Details: After spending 4 days straight in a single match Dr. Tendo became [REDACTED] and started attempting to attack D-Class wearing uniforms with jeans, and a gray shirt with an orange collar. Contact was lost with Site [sp]__[/sp] after Dr. Tendo placed two (2) explosives on the wall of SCP [REDACTED] causing a containment breach killing [sp]__[/sp] personnel. SCP [REDACTED] has not be contained as of yet.
[I]I propose termination of Dr. Tendo and that we use disposable personnel for testing SCP-XXX for now on -Dr. Velasquez[/I][/QUOTE]
Lol why did you add the clothes the D-Class was wearing.
Test #126
Name: Dr. Tendo
Subject: Splinter Cell: Conviction
Details: Dr. Tendo seemed to disappear from the containment room of SCP-XXX shortly after being left alone. When agents dispatched to locate and potentially terminate Dr. Tendo seemed to abruptly lose radio contact with HQ, the area was contained and all personnel still on-site were presumed MIA, or dead. When teams entered the facility several months later, operative A-24 "█████" discovered Dr. Tendo, alone in a somewaht darknened room, with the corpses of all on-site researchers, agents and D-Class near him. Dr. Tendo was, at this point, incapacitated by operative A-24. Medical diagnosis shows Dr. Tendo to be in good health, though, unexplainably, his occular nerves seem damaged in a way that would suggest color-blindness.
[I]He's gone too far. I say we neutralize Dr. Tendo while we have him asleep.[/I] Dr. █████
Guys, stop. It was funny at first, but now it's taking over the entire thread. Take it to the sandbox or something if you want to keep building on it. It's fine to post your ideas for an SCP, but holy shit, it's been two pages, give it a rest.
i can't stop laughing at the last page oh god you guys
[QUOTE=zeldar;32672266]Lol why did you add the clothes the D-Class was wearing.[/QUOTE]
ISA colors. You wouldn't understand unless you played the game.
[QUOTE=certified;32672510]ISA colors. You wouldn't understand unless you played the game.[/QUOTE]
That seems a little obscure. I've played the game and I still didn't really know what you were getting at.
[QUOTE=Grim Joker;32672465]Guys, stop. It was funny at first, but now it's taking over the entire thread. Take it to the sandbox or something if you want to keep building on it. It's fine to post your ideas for an SCP, but holy shit, it's been two pages, give it a rest.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE]I say we neutralize Dr. Tendo while we have him asleep.[/QUOTE]
What I was going for.
As much as i love the SCP with the video game console, we do have to move on. Post a suggestion for it if you want, but don't put the focus on it.
I propose a bag of candy that looks like a bag of skittles in which each flavor gives a person different abilitys or makes the person have a completely different personality.
Not a very good suggestion. Probably been done before.
[QUOTE=megafat;32672996]As much as i love the SCP with the video game console, we do have to move on. Post a suggestion for it if you want, but don't put the focus on it.
I propose a bag of candy that looks like a bag of skittles in which each flavor gives a person different abilitys or makes the person have a completely different personality.
Not a very good suggestion. Probably been done before.[/QUOTE]
[video=youtube;sxItH0I6xmQ]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sxItH0I6xmQ[/video]
Somebody should make this guy an SCP.
[I]"No attempts to contain SCP-XXX have been proved to work reliably. Also, we really need to get rid of these Skittles, they're taking up the whole containment room."[/I]
[url]http://sandbox.scp-wiki.net/zombiis-test[/url]
I've updated my draft a fair amount, anyone care to give it an evaluation?
I once had an idea about one that was a never-ending roll of toilet paper that adhered to everything it touched and was unremovable. Or it had a feeling similar to shark skin and was extremely abrasive. :v:
I think I posted that idea or two versions of it before, but I can't remember.
One thing about some living scp's i don't like, is that the writer almost always puts '...and they seem to not need sustenance or water...' which bothers me. If they have organs, they need food. Simple. Stop trying to take a cop out...
[QUOTE=MightyMax;32674106]One thing about some living scp's i don't like, is that the writer almost always puts '...and they seem to not need sustenance or water...' which bothers me. If they have organs, they need food. Simple. Stop trying to take a cop out...[/QUOTE]
It's the otherworldliness of it. That's like saying about 682 "if it lives, it can die".
[QUOTE=Cone;32674395]It's the otherworldliness of it. That's like saying about 682 "if it lives, it can die".[/QUOTE]
It needs to die eventually, it being unkillable is getting old
[QUOTE=*Freezorg*;32674936]It needs to die eventually, it being unkillable is getting old[/QUOTE]
apparently, the whole point of SCP-682 is to be unkillable.
also, when are we gonna do the SCP MC server again?
[url]http://www.scp-wiki.net/scp-586[/url] something similar to the I, Toaster article.
[QUOTE=brandonsh;32673046][video=youtube;sxItH0I6xmQ]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sxItH0I6xmQ[/video]
Somebody should make this guy an SCP.
[I]"No attempts to contain SCP-XXX have been proved to work reliably. Also, we really need to get rid of these Skittles, they're taking up the whole containment room."[/I][/QUOTE]
If everything he touches turns to skittles how did he have sex with his wife to make his baby? And how does he fap?
[QUOTE=Aperture fan;32675541]If everything he touches turns to skittles how did he have sex with his wife to make his baby? And how does he fap?[/QUOTE]
I guess he just woke up one day and his pillow was made of skittles.
And maybe, the transition from flesh to skittle is what he uses to fap - maybe it's a nice feeling.
[QUOTE=Aperture fan;32675541]If everything he touches turns to skittles how did he have sex with his wife to make his baby?[/QUOTE]
artificial insemination
[QUOTE=No_0ne;32676655]artificial insemination[/QUOTE]
It's probably just his hands that turn shit to skittles. How else would he wear clothes, and walk on the floor?
God forbid all skin contact turns things to skittles. The second he was born the doctor's gloves would turn to skittles, followed by the doctor, followed by the hospital, followed by the entire earth and so on.
Wait, if everything his hands touch turn to Skittles, then how does the air surrounding them not spontaneously turn to them?
And what constitutes a thing? If he touches the Earth will the whole thing turn to Skittles or just the area he touches. If he poked a mountain would the whole mountain fall apart or just one rock, or the entire universe?
Shit is confusing.
[QUOTE=DanRatherman;32676779]God forbid all skin contact turns things to skittles. The second he was born the doctor's gloves would turn to skittles, followed by the doctor, followed by the hospital, followed by the entire earth and so on.
Wait, if everything his hands touch turn to Skittles, then how does the air surrounding them not spontaneously turn to them?
And what constitutes a thing? If he touches the Earth will the whole thing turn to Skittles or just the area he touches. If he poked a mountain would the whole mountain fall apart or just one rock, or the entire universe?
Shit is confusing.[/QUOTE]Which is why im glad such a thing doesn't exist.
[editline]8th October 2011[/editline]
Also has anyone ever read an SCP and you were like 'fuck this is good' and then you got to the bottom and you're like 'that was it?'. A lot of good ones (to me) are like that, like this one: [url]http://www.scp-wiki.net/scp-291[/url]
I had an idea for an SCP
A pacific island off of Bermuda. If any organic being is put on the island for more than 12 hours, they will "hyper-evolve", like putting a horseshoe crab on the island will result in a mirelurk-type monster.
[QUOTE=Strongbad;32675282]apparently, the whole point of SCP-682 is to be unkillable.
also, when are we gonna do the SCP MC server again?[/QUOTE]
Not unkillable. Just extremely hard to kill. If we killed him, the article would have no point whatsoever.
[QUOTE=DrMann;32677628]Not unkillable. Just extremely hard to kill. If we killed him, the article would have no point whatsoever.[/QUOTE]
Except you've terminated other SCPs before and had no problem with rendering their entire article invalid. In-story, SCPs have been terminated for worse reasons than the reasons for terminating 682.
[QUOTE=Grim Joker;32677688]Except you've terminated other SCPs before and had no problem with rendering their entire article invalid. In-story, SCPs have been terminated for worse reasons than the reasons for terminating 682.[/QUOTE]
It's a bit to integrated into the SCP community to have it taken away and at this point it's probably impossible to get SCP-682 out of every article mentioning it.
It's not even that it's integral to the community. It's integral to the concept. You have to understand, that's the entire point. It's hard to kill. To the point where we haven't found a good method yet. Everything else is in service to that trait. Yes, when made to over-the-top, it's ridiculous. Used in moderation, with attempts that make sense, it works. It might be possible to kill it, sure. That's why the Foundation keeps trying. But it's damned hard, and so far, nothing's worked.
Killing 682 would be like changing 423 so that it couldn't move from one book to another. At that point, it's just a misprinted copy of Mark Twain.
And in 682's defense, it only really fucks shit up when they take it out of the acid bath to run idiotic tests on it to try and kill it. As long as they leave it in the tank and stop throwing D-Class at it as the containment policy states, the thing is far less of a threat that any other equally tiered SCP.
Hell, it doesn't wake up every 3-6 months and kill half of the facility with a sword just on a whim, so maybe the concern is placed in the wrong place.
Can we just shove 682 into the acid bath in the corner, and focus on drafting and discussing SCPs and SCP minecraft servers?
For the short time we got that server going it was great despite being 5 players max, slightly laggy, and having an unorganized chat. (a plugin for local area messages and specific channels would be very, very useful)
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
