Are you fed up yet? WELL TOO BAD, HERE YOU GO: Five Nights at Freddy's 3 Trailer - General

in the far future, time travel technology will run solely on FNAF development.

did u kno that FIVE NITES AT FUKS is a REAL PLACE????

Who wouldnt milk the FNAF fanbase. I mean come on guys, pretty sure the dev Scott is self-aware FNAF is on limited time and hes just making the most of it. Id do the same.

Wonder whether this game will be a prequel or a sequel seeing as how the last game was a prequel.

[QUOTE=Hogie bear;47015361]There isn't even any point now all the mystery is gone, it's just some cash in at this point.[/QUOTE] Just think of it as him exploiting the shit out of stupid people who will just eat this up. I know I'd do the same thing.

The profit he's made from these games must be pretty insane.

The games are a decent idea but the fanbase is just embarassing Sonic tier OC, overanalyzing everything and explaining that your point and click game that lasts less than 2 hours is actually the deepest game ever written and is a testament to the craft of writing

[QUOTE=Dick Slamfist;47016615]The games are a decent idea but the fanbase is just embarassing Sonic tier OC, overanalyzing everything and explaining that your point and click game that lasts less than 2 hours is actually the deepest game ever written and is a testament to the craft of writing[/QUOTE] Got to admit the overanalyzing thing is kinda fun because it lead to things such as finding the murdered children report poster and crying painting in the hall thing

finally, a feature awaited by many yellow-green vomit filter

[QUOTE=Gorm;47015378] 2. The rate at which the games were made.[/QUOTE] Um to be fair, creating a game like this takes no time at all.

the fact that fn@f2 is more expensive than the first just proves he's a cash pig now.

[QUOTE=Dick Slamfist;47016615]The games are a decent idea but the fanbase is just embarassing Sonic tier OC, overanalyzing everything and explaining that your point and click game that lasts less than 2 hours is actually the deepest game ever written and is a testament to the craft of writing[/QUOTE] Really? I couldn't find anyone saying that in the FNAF thread amongst all the floods of god-awful fanart and knot jokes.

[QUOTE=fudge blood;47017011]the fact that fn@f2 is more expensive than the first just proves he's a cash pig now.[/QUOTE] I... Uh... Isnt that what normally happens? With like, every game series. The old ones get a price reduction over time, the new one is a standard launch price.

Why do nearly everyone on FP say the whole "hurr durr shitty cash cow games tomorrow will be fnaf4!!!" thing? The games are very obviously in an episodic form; the cost is very low and they're simple and easy to make, so why is it such a big problem that he's making more? They're little more than ascended flash games that cost as much as an app, so why not? I mean, I want him to wait a LONG time before making a fourth one, but people act as if they're getting ripped off. I just fail to understand why everyone outside of the fnaf general chat seems to shit on this series at every opportunity.

It's the same problem with the assassin's creed series. Release too much of it and you eventually get bored of the game.

[QUOTE=LiquidNazgul;47015804]Kinda wished it used more ominous music instead of the DUHHHHHHHH sound effects we've heard a trillion times before. And that font made it look like the trailer for generic war shooter game: the sequel.[/QUOTE] Doesn't Scott use public domain music for everything?

I feel like, now that apparently the pizzeria is a haunted house-kinda place, it would be a really good excuse to try something a bit more...active, for lack of a better word? Especially since there's only one animatronic, being stalked by it as you go around would be a good change of pace.

I feel this is appropriate: [media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QZocvme6cYc[/media]

I was hoping it would be different gameplay wise. Gonna pass on this one. It does look a lot better visually. It's a real step up from 2.

Why do you guys act as if he only cares about money at this point? The first game: he didn't expect it to get that much attention. The second game: he got really excited, and rushed and released it early after he found out how long it'll take to upload a demo, and how the game looked like it was going good in LP videos. Even in the mobile version he took out a bunch of buyable "cheats" (added them back later on, but all in a bundle) because of the negative feedback. Yeah, I do hope the 3rd one isn't as rushed as the second (trailer jump scare kinda seems rushed, but better than the second game jumpscares).

OMG SO SCARY ANIMATONTRICS!1111 [editline]27th January 2015[/editline] Run it into the earth and out the other side [editline]27th January 2015[/editline] Not that this game wasn't fucking retarded to begin with

Everybody who is saying there is no new mechanics or anything in this thread or in general is really silly. It is a [U]teaser[/U] trailer for a game that isn't even out yet. At least wait until the game is actually out or has more info around the mechanics before you say stuff like that.

Well this stinks. The lore we got from the second game basically hinted at [sp]a previous Fazbear entertainment place that was before the 80s places you in during FNAF2.[/sp] We thought we were going to do a reverse trilogy and the lore would give hints as to what really caused the animatronics to go nuts. But it seems Scott doesn't want that yet (I imagine it would tie loose questions and thus mean no more Freddy games.) I suppose one animatronic is ok, seeing as we get some fluid animation again as apposed to the stilted bloated animatronics in FNAF2. But I don't like how it looks. The original cast looked unnervingly creepy, because they were designed to actually look appealing to children when they obviously weren't. Now there's a sort of Uber Animatron that looks "forced". Like this is what a "horror" version of a killer animatronic would look like.

I do like that he is listening to people and their problems with 2, everybody was disappointed with the crappy death "animations" so he sacrificed more enemies for more detail into 1

[QUOTE=Nemisis116;47018344]I do like that he is listening to people and their problems with 2, everybody was disappointed with the crappy death "animations" so he sacrificed more enemies for more detail into 1[/QUOTE] Kinda extreme though. Let's go from Eleven killer Animatronics (Original Freddy Gang, Toy Freddy Gang, Foxy, Mangle, Balloon Boy, Puppet, and Golden Freddy). To just one (Chewed up Bonnie thing). Then again, knowing Scott it's possible that there's probably more than just one Animatron we know about. Scott loves his surprises.

More like 'are you fred up yet' dgaf

[QUOTE=YourBreakfsat;47017942]Why do you guys act as if he only cares about money at this point? The first game: he didn't expect it to get that much attention. The second game: he got really excited, [B]and rushed and released it early after he found out how long it'll take to upload a demo[/B], and how the game looked like it was going good in LP videos. Even in the mobile version he took out a bunch of buyable "cheats" (added them back later on, but all in a bundle) because of the negative feedback. Yeah, I do hope the 3rd one isn't as rushed as the second (trailer jump scare kinda seems rushed, but better than the second game jumpscares).[/QUOTE] doesn't that kind of explain why?

This is literally becoming the Saw movies of video games.

[QUOTE=Rellow;47015569]Five Nights at Freddy's Five: Nights at Freddy's Five: Nights at Freddy's Five: Nights at Freddy's Five: Nights at Freddy's Five: Nights at Freddy's Five: Nights at Freddy's Five: Nights at Freddy's...[/QUOTE] -2,147,483,648 Nights at Freddy's

[QUOTE=Ezhik;47018796]-2,147,483,648 Nights at Freddy's[/QUOTE] It's like FN@F but set in the stone age. Now you're a night-shift guard at Ugga's Pizza Cavern and you have to try and stop the dinosaur entertainers from mauling you. Instead of a security tablet you have a slab with crude drawings on it.