[QUOTE=Dr. Gestapo;48310510]putting a banana in your butthole is kind of amazing i guess[/QUOTE]
Great and very original comment xddddddddddddddddd how do i upvote?
[QUOTE=draugur;48318114]And that somehow makes it okay? "It's hard being the bigger person so I'll just be a complete scumbag instead." I honestly can't tell if you're defending their behavior or just trying to shed some light on the situation. But either way I've already concluded that the people making fun of him over this banana thing are scumbags. Anyone with a sense of basic morality would conclude as such though.[/QUOTE]
I don't get it. Don't people here make fun of others all of the time for the stupid shit they do? I'm not arguing that making fun of TAA's banana adventure is right or wrong, but what makes this situation different from the rest?
[QUOTE=AbioFlesh;48318383]I don't get it. Don't people here make fun of others all of the time for the stupid shit they do? I'm not arguing that making fun of TAA's banana adventure is right or wrong, but what makes this situation different from the rest?[/QUOTE]
it isn't, it's still childish as hell.
[QUOTE=AbioFlesh;48318383]I don't get it. Don't people here make fun of others all of the time for the stupid shit they do? I'm not arguing that making fun of TAA's banana adventure is right or wrong, but what makes this situation different from the rest?[/QUOTE]
It's marginally different because it's making fun of him for something that he A. didn't upload him self, and B. isn't something that's actually worthy of being made fun of for.
Here's a situation that would be about the same as this, Imagine of Donald Trump was secretly gay and someone leaked a gay sex tape between Mr. Trump and some dude. As a result people like Starlight began "making fun" of Trump for being Gay even though there is literally nothing wrong with being gay. But because Donald Trump is gay and Donald Trump is a generally shit person, it's somehow now perfectly okay to talk shit about Trump being gay. Wrong, we make fun of Donald Trump for his backwards, racist politics, not whatever his sexual orientation or fetishes are. Or imagine if someone had a BDSM sex tape leaked and you made fun of them for being into BDSM instead of their shit opinion on environmental issues. Same concept and you'd still be completely in the wrong for doing so.
It's all about context, TAA didn't consent to that being put out there, he consents and actively puts his stupid opinions out there though. If you're going to make fun of someone, do it for the right reasons, not what's easiest to pull cheap quips about.
TAA's sexual fantasies are irrelevant, especially when they were made public knowledge against his will. Same goes for literally anyone. It's the same as discrediting an argument because the opposing person is a female or something equally not important to the topic at hand.
[QUOTE=draugur;48318549]It's marginally different because it's making fun of him for something that he A. didn't upload him self, and B. isn't something that's actually worthy of being made fun of for.
Here's a situation that would be about the same as this, Imagine of Donald Trump was secretly gay and someone leaked a gay sex tape between Mr. Trump and some dude. As a result people like Starlight began "making fun" of Trump for being Gay even though there is literally nothing wrong with being gay. But because Donald Trump is gay and Donald Trump is a generally shit person, it's somehow now perfectly okay to talk shit about Trump being gay. Wrong, we make fun of Donald Trump for his backwards, racist politics, not whatever his sexual orientation or fetishes are. Or imagine if someone had a BDSM sex tape leaked and you made fun of them for being into BDSM instead of their shit opinion on environmental issues. Same concept and you'd still be completely in the wrong for doing so.
It's all about context, TAA didn't consent to that being put out there, he consents and actively puts his stupid opinions out there though. If you're going to make fun of someone, do it for the right reasons, not what's easiest to pull cheap quips about.
TAA's sexual fantasies are irrelevant, especially when they were made public knowledge against his will. Same goes for literally anyone. It's the same as discrediting an argument because the opposing person is a female or something equally not important to the topic at hand.[/QUOTE]
I see, understandable. Though, to be honest, I never really seen much objection to situations similar to the examples you gave me.
[QUOTE=AbioFlesh;48318792]I see, understandable. Though, to be honest, I never really seen much objection to situations similar to the examples you gave me.[/QUOTE]
There should be. The problem is that there's not really much to be said and nothing constructive usually comes of it from the other end, just more ignorance. It's sort of like trying to argue with conspiracy theorists, logic and reason aren't going to get you super far usually.
[QUOTE=TheCreeper;48314181]I'm not sure why you think those "Florida" threads were posted because of a "meme" that I never heard about until very recently.[/QUOTE]
Then what on earth was your intent of posting a bazillion articles relating to Florida that made it out to be this state that comes from the deepest fucking reaches of outer space? :v:
[QUOTE=Whomobile;48310809]To be honest you're normally only gonna find crazies on Tumblr if you actively seek them out. the only femnazi/sjw/angst teen stuff I see on Tumblr is in comments of other people pointing out how wrong they are.[/QUOTE]
This is how I've always felt about Tumblr and I never understood why (not too long ago) FP always bandwagoned about it being full of fanatic sjw types.
It's not that they don't exist but tumblr was basically a punchline and actual things from the site were rarely discussed in any of those threads.
[QUOTE=AbioFlesh;48318792]I see, understandable. Though, to be honest, I never really seen much objection to situations similar to the examples you gave me.[/QUOTE]
DSP isn't getting as many insults as he used to and we still hate him. FP can mellow with time.
I really don't get why TJ gets the treatment he does here. He made an offhand comment about raping someone. Shit behavior, but what does that have to do with literally any of his arguments? What does bananas/oil/micropenis have to do with any of his arguments? If anyone was aggressively made Ad Hominem's bitch, it's definitely TJ.
Every time I see him brought up no matter how stupid what he's actually saying is or isn't it doesn't matter. You could take any thread from a community of people who hate him in reaction to any of his videos and compare with another comment thread from another video and find virtually no difference at all. That's how disengaged the people who hate him are from the idea of doing anything but endlessly shitposting in a flurry of bananas, oil, and of course, rape.
If this is how you people do argumentation, I need to be reminded how you're literally any better than him in any way.
[QUOTE=CoixNiro;48323781]I really don't get why TJ gets the treatment he does here. He made an offhand comment about raping someone. Shit behavior, but what does that have to do with literally any of his arguments? What does bananas/oil/micropenis have to do with any of his arguments? If anyone was aggressively made Ad Hominem's bitch, it's definitely TJ.
Every time I see him brought up no matter how stupid what he's actually saying is or isn't it doesn't matter. You could take any thread from a community of people who hate him in reaction to any of his videos and compare with another comment thread from another video and find virtually no difference at all. That's how disengaged the people who hate him are from the idea of doing anything but endlessly shitposting in a flurry of bananas, oil, and of course, rape.
If this is how you people do argumentation, I need to be reminded how you're literally any better than him in any way.[/QUOTE]
it's not how we do argumentation, it's how we don't take this cretin seriously.
[QUOTE=HybridTheroy;48323923]it's not how we do argumentation, it's how we don't take this cretin seriously.[/QUOTE]
So how long is the sentence for saying rape words at people online, exactly? Eternity? This went down over 3 years ago and he's apologized for it numerous times. I don't see him doing anything of the sort since, so I don't really see why it's so important to do... this.
And while we're at it, I can see you're doing a great job of not taking him seriously, replying twice in this thread.
[QUOTE=HybridTheroy;48323923]it's not how we do argumentation, it's how we don't take this cretin seriously.[/QUOTE]
"It's important for me to constantly remind you how much I'm not paying attention to you by constantly talking about you."
This reminds me of the people who shitpost on reddit about how much they hate reddit while posting on reddit.
[QUOTE=CoixNiro;48323781]I really don't get why TJ gets the treatment he does here. He made an offhand comment about raping someone. Shit behavior, but what does that have to do with literally any of his arguments? What does bananas/oil/micropenis have to do with any of his arguments? If anyone was aggressively made Ad Hominem's bitch, it's definitely TJ.
Every time I see him brought up no matter how stupid what he's actually saying is or isn't it doesn't matter. You could take any thread from a community of people who hate him in reaction to any of his videos and compare with another comment thread from another video and find virtually no difference at all. That's how disengaged the people who hate him are from the idea of doing anything but endlessly shitposting in a flurry of bananas, oil, and of course, rape.
If this is how you people do argumentation, I need to be reminded how you're literally any better than him in any way.[/QUOTE]
Lmao, you have a pretty damn funny definition of "offhand".
[QUOTE=CoixNiro;48323781]I really don't get why TJ gets the treatment he does here. He made an offhand comment about raping someone. Shit behavior, but what does that have to do with literally any of his arguments? What does bananas/oil/micropenis have to do with any of his arguments? If anyone was aggressively made Ad Hominem's bitch, it's definitely TJ.
Every time I see him brought up no matter how stupid what he's actually saying is or isn't it doesn't matter. You could take any thread from a community of people who hate him in reaction to any of his videos and compare with another comment thread from another video and find virtually no difference at all. That's how disengaged the people who hate him are from the idea of doing anything but endlessly shitposting in a flurry of bananas, oil, and of course, rape.
If this is how you people do argumentation, I need to be reminded how you're literally any better than him in any way.[/QUOTE]
he's a belligerent asshole and he'd be a belligerent asshole with or without the rape comment or the banana thing
now i'm not, in any way, shape or form, trying to justify leaking private stuff - which is an absolutely awful thing, regardless of who it happens to - or using 3 year old comments as ammo, but while might not be [I]excusable[/I] to do it, it's, at the very least, [I]understandable[/I] why people would take the cheap and condescending route when mocking a guy who almost always takes the cheap and condescending route himself
[QUOTE=Zyler;48325882]"It's important for me to constantly remind you how much I'm not paying attention to you by constantly talking about you."
This reminds me of the people who shitpost on reddit about how much they hate reddit while posting on reddit.[/QUOTE]
Not really. Someone posted TAA so now we're talking about TAA, and why you can't take any of his comments on "sjws" etc. seriously given his awful comments about women and rape victims.
That said I 100% agree that the banana comments are wrong. Nobody should be shaming him for that.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.