[QUOTE=CodeMonkey3;49510435]I have one but it's a replica. It's somewhere around here.[/QUOTE]
I considered getting a specter DR.
[media]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TnjNmNdjk1A[/media]
That price tag made me nope the fuck out though. If I ever manage to get a salary of over $70,000 a year, I [I]might[/I] get one.
So, I know if I put a stock on a revolver I have to sbr it... But what if its a wrist brace attachment?
[QUOTE=S31-Syntax;49512221]So, I know if I put a stock on a revolver I have to sbr it... But what if its a wrist brace attachment?[/QUOTE]
It's not really different, other than you ruined a perfectly good revolver. If any thing you make it worse. Wasted weight on a gun that is already meant to be fired without a stock.
[QUOTE=S31-Syntax;49512221]So, I know if I put a stock on a revolver I have to sbr it... But what if its a wrist brace attachment?[/QUOTE]
shouldering a wrist brace is "redesigning" it under a recent atf ruling and makes an otherwise legal device illegal
keep in mind this is the same branch of the government that made owning shoes with laces punishable by up to 10 years and $250,000 per shoe for 3 years
There's guns that have no practical purpose, and then there's pointless guns. This is like paying full price for an AA-12 that only shoots something like .17hmr. It ignores the whole point of the weapon
And considering what a huge pain it is to make belted ammunition, I'd rather have a box mag fed semi auto, even knowing how unreliable the 249 was with box mags.
m249s take stanags though, the only problem is that it has a bunch of unnecessary features like a quick change barrel that add weight and complexity
Need a bit of help real quickly. I'm seriously thinking about getting one of theses however.
[t]http://www.onpointsupply.com/images/chiappa_rhino_60ds_21.jpg[/t]
I need to know if they can take breaks and suppressors? I can't find any images online of them with attachments of that nature.
They can't take either without serious modification. A suppressor would be pointless on that, though, since there is a gap between the cylinder and the barrel that will still generate a lot of noise.
[QUOTE=ElderRanger;49512456]Need a bit of help real quickly. I'm seriously thinking about getting one of theses however.
I need to know if they can take breaks and suppressors? I can't find any images online of them with attachments of that nature.[/QUOTE]
First, it's a revolver so any thoughts on suppressors need to go out the window now. Revolvers and suppressors don't dance unless it's a Nagant. Then it's just pitiful.
Second, you need to pony up a good chunk of cash to have a muzzle device added to the gun. Very few revolvers even have a muzzle device. Most people just get them Mag-Na Ported and that's it. Only other option is again to find a S&W style muzzle brake used on their S&W500/460 revolvers and pay a smith to heavily modify the gun to use it.
Third, unless you are buying this revolver for the cool factor, there are better and cheaper revolvers than the Rhino. Chiappa has issues with fit/finish and some QC. A nice single action Ruger is a good entry point, or if double action is your game, a S&W will do.
I'll admit its for the cool factor, but thanks for answering my questions!
[QUOTE=ElderRanger;49512456]Need a bit of help real quickly. I'm seriously thinking about getting one of theses however.
[t]http://www.onpointsupply.com/images/chiappa_rhino_60ds_21.jpg[/t]
I need to know if they can take breaks and suppressors? I can't find any images online of them with attachments of that nature.[/QUOTE]
Don't buy one. They're seriously overpriced pistols for a simple gimmick. They're overly fragile and overly complex. You can break the revolver from just normal use insanely easily. I owned one of these and highly regret it.
Well, this guy on Reddit just got one of the M249s. 1 of 200, bought it for $9,500
Gallery here: [url]http://imgur.com/a/Y0dQR[/url]
So, a friend of mine posted this link on FB the other day, and I figured it'd be kind of interesting to share.
I honestly wasn't expecting anywhere near as many odd-ball rounds as we got on the list to appear like ".22 blank, 8mm blank, .455 Webley, and .41 Long Colt" amongst the normals like .45, 9mm, and .380. Also. A lot more High Standards and SKSs being used than I'd ever guess.
[url]http://www.thetrace.org/2016/01/chicago-crime-guns-raw-data/[/url]
Does any have any studies showing how gun control for a country is actually good?
[QUOTE=BLOB Fish Dude;49519006]Does any have any studies showing how gun control for a country is actually good?[/QUOTE]
There are loads of really badly done studies out tere that support that conclusion. Just search "byback effectiveness monash" in Google and find them.
Anyone have experience with pocket carry?
I've got a Kimber Ultra Carry II and I IWB carry it, but sometimes I just don't have time to strap on the belt and IWB holster and get it all situated and everything. I was thinking of getting a pocket carry holster for the Kimber, but is 25 ounces of weight and 6.5" length too big for pocket carry?
Anyone know what would be comfortable? I always see fuckin' derringers, tiny .38 snubs, and .22's advertised as pocket carry guns, but is it possible to carry something larger?
Pic related.
[img_thumb]http://i1190.photobucket.com/albums/z449/Whibble/IMG_0878_zpsbuobiwgo.jpg[/img_thumb]
If you have deep enough pockets ( [sp] in more ways than 1 [/sp] ), the sky is the limit.
Seriously, get a different gun if you intend to pocket carry. Or you use cargo pants.
Largest gun I would consider pocket carrying is something like an LC9.
[QUOTE=download;49519187]There are loads of really badly done studies out tere that support that conclusion. Just search "byback effectiveness monash" in Google and find them.[/QUOTE]
Fuck, I meant no gun control, woops.
[QUOTE=BLOB Fish Dude;49519240]Fuck, I meant no gun control, woops.[/QUOTE]
Take a look at studies on New Zealand and Canada. Both have in the last few decades gotten rid of firearms registration in most cases.
[QUOTE=Ridge;49518661]Well, this guy on Reddit just got one of the M249s. 1 of 200, bought it for $9,500
Gallery here: [url]http://imgur.com/a/Y0dQR[/url][/QUOTE]
That just makes me sad. A weapon like that isn't meant for single shot marksmanship, it's designed to be fired in bursts against area targets. A semiautomatic LMG is like a Ferrari with a lawnmower engine.
It will never live up to its intended role.
[QUOTE=Psychokitten;49519289]That just makes me sad. A weapon like that isn't meant for single shot marksmanship, it's designed to be fired in bursts against area targets. A semiautomatic LMG is like a Ferrari with a lawnmower engine.
It will never live up to its intended role.[/QUOTE]
What if a bumpfire stock was added? Or a hyperfire type trigger added?
[QUOTE=Lone_Star94;49519302]What if a bumpfire stock was added? Or a hyperfire type trigger added?[/QUOTE]
A bumpfire stock would be iffy. Your non-firing hand is [I]supposed[/I] to be up on top of the stock, under your cheek when firing. I'm not sure why they make you do that, but there's probably a reason for it. Even without doing that you'd still have trouble; the weight of the weapon is resting on the bipod. You wouldn't be able to easily apply forward pressure, you'd have to pull your firing hand and shoulder back, which would be undoubtedly awkward. Bumpfire stocks are meant to be used unsupported, M249s are not.
Dunno what a hyperfire trigger is.
That binary trigger someone posted a couple days ago might do the trick.
[QUOTE=Psychokitten;49519354]
Dunno what a hyperfire trigger is.
That binary trigger someone posted a couple days ago might do the trick.[/QUOTE]
That's what I meant, but too lazy to google.
[QUOTE=download;49519250]Take a look at studies on New Zealand and Canada. Both have in the last few decades gotten rid of firearms registration in most cases.[/QUOTE]
Even better, look at what happened in Germany and Austria with all the terrorism and influx of "refugees", everyone went out and bought every gun they could.
Israel is easing their strict laws on handguns due to the uptick in stabbings and other attacks.
M249 with a binary trigger. Or maybe if you live in a State where you can get an NFA and make it automatic it's now slightly more accessible.
[editline]13th January 2016[/editline]
$10,000 more accessible
[QUOTE=Psychokitten;49519354]A bumpfire stock would be iffy. Your non-firing hand is [I]supposed[/I] to be up on top of the stock, under your cheek when firing. I'm not sure why they make you do that, but there's probably a reason for it. Even without doing that you'd still have trouble; the weight of the weapon is resting on the bipod. You wouldn't be able to easily apply forward pressure, you'd have to pull your firing hand and shoulder back, which would be undoubtedly awkward. Bumpfire stocks are meant to be used unsupported, M249s are not.
Dunno what a hyperfire trigger is.
That binary trigger someone posted a couple days ago might do the trick.[/QUOTE]
SlideFire made the Slide Fire BFR, a belt fed AR15 with a bumpfire stock on it:
[img]http://www.gunsandammo.com/files/2013/06/Slide-Fire-Belt-Fed-Rifle-BFR_F.jpg[/img]
Watch these, bumpfire with bipod does work:
[url]https://www.full30.com/video/abe03b9d294f4f9bfd63585380586167[/url]
[url]https://www.full30.com/video/1ca1010bda6ed2180ea2f284052fb588[/url]
Then add the recoil rail:
[url]http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2013/11/21/recoil-rail/[/url]
[img]http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/recoil-rail.png[/img]
[QUOTE=MAC21500;49519741]SlideFire made the Slide Fire BFR, a belt fed AR15 with a bumpfire stock on it:
[img]http://www.gunsandammo.com/files/2013/06/Slide-Fire-Belt-Fed-Rifle-BFR_F.jpg[/img]
Watch these, bumpfire with bipod does work:
[url]https://www.full30.com/video/abe03b9d294f4f9bfd63585380586167[/url]
[url]https://www.full30.com/video/1ca1010bda6ed2180ea2f284052fb588[/url]
Then add the recoil rail:
[url]http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2013/11/21/recoil-rail/[/url]
[img]http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/recoil-rail.png[/img][/QUOTE]
I stand corrected then.
Only issue now is you'd have to get the bumpfire stock custom made. That's gonna be hella expensive, but whatever, the gun already costs almost twice as much as my car did. A few hundred dollars more ain't gonna make a difference.
I'm searching for Zastava M70 wood furniture "front handguard lower and upper"
Do you guys know where I can find that and if they ship to Sweden?
[QUOTE=CodeMonkey3;49519694]M249 with a binary trigger. Or maybe if you live in a State where you can get an NFA and make it automatic it's now slightly more accessible.
[editline]13th January 2016[/editline]
$10,000 more accessible[/QUOTE]
Post 1986 automatics are illegal, unless you're Diane Feinstein.
[editline]13th January 2016[/editline]
[QUOTE=4NGRY MUFF1N;49520210]I'm searching for Zastava M70 wood furniture "front handguard lower and upper"
Do you guys know where I can find that and if they ship to Sweden?[/QUOTE]
Import and export laws for gun parts are insane for Europe. You're going to have to research your own importation laws then give a call to a US company to see if they can sell you one. Are AKM's even legal in any capacity in Sweden?
I imagine Europe is like Canada for gun parts: if it's not a receiver, unpinned mag, or short barrel for a handgun, it's not controlled at all, and can be imported from anywhere.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
