I saw this movie with my friends, they stole all the 3d glasses.
People have been saying how awesome it's supposed to be, so when others go to see it they expect something completely blown out of proportion of what it actually is. I don't carry expectations so I'm fine.
[QUOTE=ollylikesmilk;19276821]Then you obviously have a horrible taste in movies.[/QUOTE]
Oh, god! His opinion is different from yours! Shun the non-believer!
I wouldn't walk out incase something good happened later on and because of the money spent.
[QUOTE=ollylikesmilk;19276668]For a movie that cost upwards 200 billion dollars to create, simply did not impress me. I was expecting so much more with a budget such as that.[/QUOTE]
It cost $200 million, not $200 billion. Bit of a difference.
I found my 3D glasses more entertaining than the movie itself.
[QUOTE=Ezhik;19276839]I saw this movie with my friends, they stole all the 3d glasses.[/QUOTE]
You pay 1€, the cinema just pays 57 c, and they are one-way glasses.
The cinemas just want to save money.
[QUOTE=smurfy;19276857]It cost $200 million, not $200 billion. Bit of a difference.[/QUOTE]
$200 million dollars and still using papyrus
i think james cameron probably spent most of that money on hookers and blow then
[QUOTE=ollylikesmilk;19276527]This film wins the award for the only movie so dull that I walked out of it into a snowstorm (and in hundreds of movies I have seen throughout the years I’ve never walked out of one, but this), for lack of something more interesting to do. "Boring" and "pointless" are the only two words I have for this sorry excuse for entertainment. Here in uptown Russia there is no shortage of bad weather to contend with, and I found a 2 mile walk in the blizzard infinitely more interesting. Perhaps I just didn't "get it," but my girlfriend who stayed behind in the theater didn't seem to get it either in the nearby mall, and she left to pick me up after an hour or so in. Visiting with her 88 year old grandmother afterwards was a nice break in the monotony.
Don't mean to impugn those who liked it, but I thought it was a complete waste of time.
Personally - I think they would be better off getting away from 24fps first - and upping it to 50 (or 60).
It would make fast action scenes so much clearer but hey that's my slice of pizza.
Speaking of pizza, I just took took mine out of the oven. Yum.
[IMG]http://i48.tinypic.com/qzn5nn.jpg[/IMG][/QUOTE]
To bad you don't have enough pizzas to put in all them boxes
Ignoring the fact 24fps is the standard in cinemas, It cost hundreds of millions of dollars for the CGI @ 24fps, how much do you think it would cost at creating double the frames?
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
