• Firearms VIII: Feinstein Appreciation Station
    2,097 replies, posted
"Pacefunch Armory"?
That's alright we'll call it Facestab. Then we'll rename it Faceshoot.
ask that nigga. its his naem.
[QUOTE=Trunk Monkay;39512455]I can be a salesmen, runs in my blood. I sold a dood a century arms WASR for twice what it was worth.[/QUOTE] Hell, selling guns is what I do right now, my manager always told me I'm one of the company's best. I can run the Canadian division. Also, there's an old gun company name that's been defunct since the '80s that could plausibly be used, but it's an old Canadian company, and I'm kinda too patriotic to want it to head south of the border for its main operations.
[QUOTE=DaCommie1;39512571]Hell, selling guns is what I do right now, my manager always told me I'm one of the company's best. I can run the Canadian division. Also, there's an old gun company name that's been defunct since the '80s that could plausibly be used, but it's an old Canadian company, and I'm kinda too patriotic to want it to head south of the border for its main operations.[/QUOTE] stay out of my territory
[QUOTE=Trunk Monkay;39512589]stay out of my territory[/QUOTE] Bitch please.
I got a mill and a lathe... what should I make?
We had someone donate over 2k 9mm Federal to Goodwill today, only a few months old. We can't sell it Sheriffs office came by, picked it all up and is going to destroy it. ffffff
why would you donate ammo to goodwill
That must've been a bitch to carry in
4k rounds were dropped off 2k rounds were carried in
[QUOTE=Esrange;39512768]We had someone donate over 2k 9mm Federal to Goodwill today, only a few months old. We can't sell it Sheriffs office came by, picked it all up and is going to destroy it. ffffff[/QUOTE] 20bux says it gets 'lost' on the way to destruction.
[QUOTE=Esrange;39512768]We had someone donate over 2k 9mm Federal to Goodwill today, only a few months old. We can't sell it Sheriffs office came by, picked it all up and is going to destroy it. ffffff[/QUOTE] Do they have any right to do that? Can you argue and try and get it back? That stuff isn't cheap, at least keep it for yourself
[QUOTE=download;39512972]Do they have any right to do that? Can you argue and try and get it back? That stuff isn't cheap, at least keep it for yourself[/QUOTE] It's probably corporate policy to hand over firearms and firearms related stuff to the police.
[QUOTE=download;39512972]Do they have any right to do that? Can you argue and try and get it back? That stuff isn't cheap, at least keep it for yourself[/QUOTE] The police probably just said they were going to destroy it to make some soccer moms feel safer. I can't honestly see them throwing away over 2,000 rounds of ammunition that happen to be the same caliber as their service pistols and submachine guns are chambered in. Like they're just going to throw this stuff away because it was in a Goodwill and then turn around and buy the exact same ammunition. They probably don't have a right to just come in and take it, but I could imagine a Goodwill employee freaking out for some silly reason and telling the cops to get rid of it, thus giving them the right.
[QUOTE=download;39512972]Do they have any right to do that? Can you argue and try and get it back? That stuff isn't cheap, at least keep it for yourself[/QUOTE] Unless he is the CEO of Goodwill then he doesn't own anything donated to or is in the store.
[QUOTE=mugofdoom;39513069]The police probably just said they were going to destroy it to make some soccer moms feel safer. I can't honestly see them throwing away over 2,000 rounds of ammunition that happen to be the same caliber as their service pistols and submachine guns are chambered in. Like they're just going to throw this stuff away because it was in a Goodwill and then turn around and buy the exact same ammunition. They probably don't have a right to just come in and take it, but I could imagine a Goodwill employee freaking out for some silly reason and telling the cops to get rid of it, thus giving them the right.[/QUOTE] It's probably a precautionary thing in case it's stolen or improperly reloaded rounds. It is kind of odd donating that much ammo at once to a goodwill.
It's about bragging rights now... [URL]http://news.yahoo.com/calif-seeks-adopt-nations-toughest-gun-laws-220030130.html[/URL] [QUOTE]Weeks after New York enacted the nation's toughest gun laws, California lawmakers said Thursday they want their state to do even more in response to recent mass shootings, particularly the Connecticut school massacre.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Ridge;39513126]It's about bragging rights now... [URL]http://news.yahoo.com/calif-seeks-adopt-nations-toughest-gun-laws-220030130.html[/URL][/QUOTE] rofl i just sure love living in california
[QUOTE=ilikecorn;39513210]We should seriously start an arms company. Specializing in "ban proof" weaponry, essentially using their own legal jargon against them. It'd be hilarious.[/QUOTE] you mean like this? [img]http://i53.photobucket.com/albums/g52/elrojo14/TPF/u15.jpg[/img]
[QUOTE=ButtsexV3;39513302]you mean like this? [img]http://i53.photobucket.com/albums/g52/elrojo14/TPF/u15.jpg[/img][/QUOTE] That poor poor AR
[QUOTE=ButtsexV3;39513302]you mean like this? [img]http://i53.photobucket.com/albums/g52/elrojo14/TPF/u15.jpg[/img][/QUOTE] Remember that scene from Aliens 3? Where Sigourney weaver comes across all those deformed clones? yeah...... [editline]8th February 2013[/editline] [QUOTE=ilikecorn;39513210]We should seriously start an arms company. Specializing in "ban proof" weaponry, essentially using their own legal jargon against them. It'd be hilarious.[/QUOTE] Better yet, with every firearm we sell to California/New York/Other shitty gun laws states, we send them a brochure on states that don't have shit gun laws and good areas to move to.
[QUOTE=ilikecorn;39513402]No, like the definition of a "detachable" magazine is the ability to be removed without a tool. Simply make a mag release that uses a simple catch, then sell a "glove" that has the tool on it. Defeats the legislature, the completely legal way. For example, search "bullet button" sure their stupid, but people eat them up in the communist state of californistan.[/QUOTE] You can buy magnetic buttons that attach over the conversion, staying legal and completely getting over it.
[QUOTE=Trunk Monkay;39513453]Remember that scene from Aliens 3? Where Sigourney weaver comes across all those deformed clones? yeah...... [/QUOTE] That's exactly what this is like, gun laws make guns look so bad. Just look at civvie thompsons and MP5s. I don't mind having semi only, that is fine. But restricting barrel size seems so pointless to me
Before [IMG_thumb]http://imageshack.us/a/img189/7126/imag0255zu.jpg[/IMG_thumb] After [IMG_thumb]http://imageshack.us/a/img5/5506/imag0272c.jpg[/IMG_thumb] Saved from the dirty disease called "Sporterized"
I keep thinking that for Canada I should make a 5.56 rimfire cartridge with the same dimensions as a .223, make like 100 guns in the rimfire calibre, and make STANAG-compatible, but not STANAG mags that are stamped for the rimfire calibre, fit in an AR, and will of course take normal .223. Why would anyone do this? Because magazines for rimfire, not just .22, but all rimfire guns are exempted from mag caps in Canada, and this would be a legal way to get 15-100 round .223 mags in Canada thanks to the piss-poor wording in the laws that allow for such technicalities.
I believe rimfire cartridges need to be rimmed though, so I don't think you'd be able to make it the same dimensions as the .223 I could be wrong though
[QUOTE=Ridge;39513126]It's about bragging rights now... [URL]http://news.yahoo.com/calif-seeks-adopt-nations-toughest-gun-laws-220030130.html[/URL][/QUOTE] [I]FUCK[/I]
Rimfire cartridges can't withstand the pressures involved in such velocities
[QUOTE=DaCommie1;39513644]I keep thinking that for Canada I should make a 5.56 rimfire cartridge with the same dimensions as a .223, make like 100 guns in the rimfire calibre, and make STANAG-compatible, but not STANAG mags that are stamped for the rimfire calibre, fit in an AR, and will of course take normal .223. Why would anyone do this? Because magazines for rimfire, not just .22, but all rimfire guns are exempted from mag caps in Canada, and this would be a legal way to get 15-100 round .223 mags in Canada thanks to the piss-poor wording in the laws that allow for such technicalities.[/QUOTE] rimfires have to have rims [editline]7th February 2013[/editline] [QUOTE=download;39513730]Rimfire cartridges can't withstand the pressures involved in such velocities[/QUOTE] you don't have to load it all the way
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.