[QUOTE=MountainWatcher;31058263]That doesn't mean shit. In the good old days, we had the inquisition, that doesn't mean it's not bad. he's saying that the main idea of doing business is a bad idea (which is).
And how so? Advertising or implanting ideas in the heads of other does not have to be evil. Showing people something don't know about which changes their opinion is pretty much what debating is.[/QUOTE] Yea but furries dont have advertising or anything like that. Its just some guy who wants to help his fetish or buy some art he likes.
[QUOTE=imasillypiggy;31058473]Yea but furries dont have advertising or anything like that. Its just some guy who wants to help his fetish or buy some art he likes.[/QUOTE]
that depends on how you throw around the word "advertising", as that word can be utilized many ways
[IMG]http://i53.tinypic.com/2eeeesk.png[/IMG]
[QUOTE=Ownederd;31058744]that depends on how you throw around the word "advertising", as that word can be utilized many ways[/QUOTE] Well yea but its no were near as deceptive as regular advertising. All it is is someone wanting to buy a fetish related item or art and then doing so.
[QUOTE=imasillypiggy;31058473]Yea but furries dont have advertising or anything like that. Its just some guy who wants to help his fetish or buy some art he likes.[/QUOTE]
Yet the guy he just paid $90 to draw something makes his living of drawing furry porn and does not actually bother to look for a steady job.
I know too many of these people. It's an incorrect priority which eventually leads to rather serious problems in the future.
[QUOTE=Ownederd;31057314]haha are you seriously going to make that association
you're cute
that's because he actually made [I]art[/I] and it's actually worth [I]something[/I][/QUOTE]
you obviously haven't seen furry art other than "RAINBOW FOX MEGA 3 DICK YIFF :3c~~~."
really, art can't be defined by what you like or dislike. you can dislike somethings content, but not the art style. take this image for example
[IMG]http://bp1.blogger.com/_ObP4-6mDtBA/R2v3EFzINPI/AAAAAAAAADo/RF7kwc0mJgQ/s320/Satan+Devouring+His+Son_Goya.JPG[/IMG]
sure, it's saturn devouring a human being. Content may be pretty bad, but artistically, it's great.
There is something oddly adorable about this.
Whats happening too me D:
[QUOTE=Silly Sil;31025098]Homosexuality, transgenderism, atheism in many countries and having each of your eyes with different color is abnormal. I guess a lot of people should die.
I'd call a pedophile a sick fuck. I'd call the wish to be an animal, and partly believing so, some kind of identity problem. But I don't see you people demanding blood of schizophrenics.
Oh hi, someone trained well in psychoanalysis. Did parents of homosexuals didn't beat them hard enough as well? And who the fuck are you to tell people what can they jack off to or what should they do in their free time? (as long as it doesn't hurt anyone)
Bad for who? For other people? I doubt it, as long as they do it on their conventions and not on the street, I don't see anyone outside the group getting hurt.
Bad for them? The only solution is to burn them on a stake I guess.
"Someone has a weird fetish that doesn't hurt anyone, but it's so weird it's grossing me out, I think that person should die for that "[/QUOTE]
Homosexuals, transgender, etc are people liking other people. Human to human is understandable, but wtf these people humping and acting like fucking animals.
[QUOTE=Desolategrunt;31059270]Homosexuals, transgender, etc are people liking other people. Human to human is understandable, but wtf these people humping and acting like fucking animals.[/QUOTE]
Please point me to part of the video where these people hump. Please.
[editline]11th July 2011[/editline]
Not EVERY furry wants to hump animals. The minority of furries are what you actually think, the rest are perfectly fine. Most of which don't even "come out" as a furry, like they'd even need to. It's just a hobby, and a creative way to express yourself in art and the likes.
[editline]11th July 2011[/editline]
I mean, look at Maus
[img]http://www.randomhouse.com/pantheon/graphicnovels/art/mauscomp_B.gif[/img]
Spiegelman proves that it's much more interesting and easy to represent characteristics in a person when you replace the person with an anthropomorphic animal. It lets people express themselves with an alternative self, with qualities that exist in humans, some not.
[QUOTE=milkandcooki;31059097]you obviously haven't seen furry art other than "RAINBOW FOX MEGA 3 DICK YIFF :3c~~~."
really, art can't be defined by what you like or dislike. you can dislike somethings content, but not the art style. take this image for example
[IMG]http://bp1.blogger.com/_ObP4-6mDtBA/R2v3EFzINPI/AAAAAAAAADo/RF7kwc0mJgQ/s320/Satan+Devouring+His+Son_Goya.JPG[/IMG]
sure, it's satan devouring a human being. Content may be pretty bad, but artistically, it's great.[/QUOTE]
Okay? I never said that art with harsh/sexual content is bad. The example you posted is an classic and timeless piece of Renaissance-era art, no doubt, but what I am referring to is shamelessly recycled furry "art" from which people defend with their horseshit "ORIGINAL RACE DO NOT STEAL ^^^^^" bullshit.
Your point is moot, and I honestly don't see why you're making an over-trivialized post.
[B]edit:[/B]
imasillypiggy, mindlessly rating people dumb every day, yay yay yay~
[QUOTE=Ownederd;31059430]Okay? I never said that art with harsh/sexual content is bad. The example you posted is an classic and timeless piece of Renaissance-era art, no doubt, but what I am referring to is shamelessly recycled furry "art" from which people defend with their horseshit "ORIGINAL RACE DO NOT STEAL ^^^^^" bullshit.
Your point is moot, and I honestly don't see why you're making an over-trivialized post.
[B]edit:[/B]
imasillypiggy, mindlessly rating people dumb every day, yay yay yay~[/QUOTE]
Yeah, there's no point in arguing with you. Instead of taking an objective approach to what I reply with, you just go "NOPE ITS NOT ART NOPE NOPE NOPE."
[QUOTE=Ownederd;31059430]imasillypiggy, mindlessly rating people dumb every day, yay yay yay~[/QUOTE] Your whole argument is that furries suck because :place stereotype here: and everything they make sucks.
[QUOTE=imasillypiggy;31059628]Your whole argument is that furries suck because :place stereotype here: and everything they make sucks.[/QUOTE]
Where did I say I [B]hate [/B]furries.
:downs:
[QUOTE=Ownederd;31059663]Where did I say I [B]hate [/B]furries.
:downs:[/QUOTE] I never said you did but calling them stupid might be close.
[QUOTE=imasillypiggy;31059692]I never said you did but calling them stupid might be close.[/QUOTE]
I wasn't calling [B]furries [/B]stupid, I was calling [B]people in general [/B]stupid. How did this get over your head?
[B]edit:[/B]
Please show me where I put the words "stupid" and "furries" in the same sentence.
[QUOTE=Ownederd;31059730]I wasn't calling [B]furries [/B]stupid, I was calling [B]people in general [/B]stupid. How did this get over your head?[/QUOTE] So in other words a useless post. Well whatever no point arguing at this point.
TBH that would be kinda fun. I'm not a furry but I love dressing up, and I love those kind of kids games.
[QUOTE=milkandcooki;31059097]you obviously haven't seen furry art other than "RAINBOW FOX MEGA 3 DICK YIFF :3c~~~."
really, art can't be defined by what you like or dislike. you can dislike somethings content, but not the art style. take this image for example
[IMG]http://bp1.blogger.com/_ObP4-6mDtBA/R2v3EFzINPI/AAAAAAAAADo/RF7kwc0mJgQ/s320/Satan+Devouring+His+Son_Goya.JPG[/IMG]
sure, it's satan devouring a human being. Content may be pretty bad, but artistically, it's great.[/QUOTE]
That's wrong. [URL]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saturn_Devouring_His_Son[/URL]
Slight name problem, my mistake. Fixing now.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
