[QUOTE=Grim2o0o;51378351]Cause you know I don't think that HSB is gonna be all hunky-dorey with me BOLTING a large safe into their precious old, rank apartment.
[editline]16th November 2016[/editline]
As I know it, you can keep ammo in the same safe, if there's room.
Basically, you can keep ammo -anywhere- since there's no real definition on 'secure lock or some other safe manner', so you can keep some ammo in your bedside drawer if you maybe put a cute little padlock on it, NOT THAT I WOULD RECOMMEND THAT.
[editline]16th November 2016[/editline]
Oh and, you're also only allowed to have the ammo for the weapons you currently own, so if you decide to sell your 30-06 and get a 7mm Mag, you -have to- get rid or sell your 30-06 or else your ass is grass.
There's also a fuckton other tiny laws that you have to abide to.
You can press your own ammo tho' so that's cool.[/QUOTE]
Sweden sure is a lot more lenient than the UK, you're allowed to have a single gun safe to store everything in but the ammo needs to be inside another locked container or safe inside that safe and the definition of safe here is pretty much just a simple gun cabinet, no weight restrictions luckily just that it has to be securely bolted to both the floor and wall.
Also pretty much you can only get shotguns and single shots here, good luck getting a semi-auto pistol unless its grandfathered in/part of a special gun club, single shot pistols they don't care about much.
Plus there is then the whole gotta be on great grounds with your local firearms officer to even get approval for all of this in the first place as it's their word that either says yep you can have this or nope, you can't.
[QUOTE=Grim2o0o;51378286]Oh boy that's the most exciting part.
Then again it's mostly like 30 SEK per round for hunting ammo, and like 10-20 SEK per round for practice ammo which is what I am gonna buy the most.
The hardest part is gonna be the actual equipment. :v:[/QUOTE]
Sell me ur MP9 and you'll have plenty of dosh for a bullets ;)
[QUOTE=Chickens!;51379738]Sell me ur MP9 and you'll have plenty of dosh for a bullets ;)[/QUOTE]
I've been having that up in the air since I was busy studying, but now that that's done I might buy a parcel and get on with it.
[editline]16th November 2016[/editline]
I'll keep you posted on that if I do.
ya'll should form a gay militia with all of this equipment you have.
[QUOTE=Xieneus;51380076]ya'll should form a gay militia with all of this equipment you have.[/QUOTE]
Prime objective is taking you the fuck out
[sp]to dinner.[/sp]
[QUOTE=kaze4159;51379113]Meanwhile in Australia
Handguns are basically impossible to get without being a competition shooter, any rifles above lever action you need to be a ranch owner for, airsoft is classified as firearms and self defence (even against wild animals) isn't a legitimate reason to own one[/QUOTE]
sucks! here you only have to be part of a gun club to own any pistol. if you've got a license you can just walk into a gun store, buy a rifle in cash and be out in under a minute :v:
in other news, got a job interview today. let's see how i do.
My brother is putting together a rifle similar to an AR15. No idea why but it's his money. Apparently it's easier to build it part by part rather than buying it whole.
[QUOTE=Adelle Zhu;51380788]My brother is putting together a rifle similar to an AR15. No idea why but it's his money. Apparently it's easier to build it part by part rather than buying it whole.[/QUOTE]
Its cheaper if you do it this way, for one thing. Easier to customize it a bit too. I had looked at building one for a while, since I'm a left-hander and its hard to find left handed guns that don't have a price hike on them.
I get major flak from my family for this, but I actually support magazine capacity limits. Just not on "assault rifles" alone. I've got a .22lr that can hold 20rds in the butt stock, for example. I don't think there's anything inherently wrong with controlling magazine capacity or ammo capacity of all weapons, since smaller mags are usually plentiful and don't really restrict the fun you can have target shooting.
yeah yeah I know I'm probably starting a shit storm debate, but honestly if I try to even have a rational discussion about this at home with my family it'll end in one of two ways:
1. My mother telling me to stop before things get worse
2. My dad literally threatening to knock me the fuck out if I don't shut the fuck up (profanity included)
so I wanted to get it out before I go home for thanksgiving lol
Dream guns though: SCAR 17S for me. sweet sweet .308, good 'ol FN Herstal, awesomely robust gas block, and one of the best ambidextrous rifles any man could ever own. Yay!
[QUOTE=paindoc;51380831]...[/QUOTE]
Yeah you might see a point to it but I honestly don't. It makes no difference if a magazine can carry 10, 20, 30 or 250 rounds, if someone wants to shoot that much they'll just load the amount of rounds they want into magazines that'll hold it, plus it makes no difference in how fast someone can shoot either which is normally the main thing used against magazines that can hold 30~ rounds, if you're an average shooter you can nail through 60 rounds in 6 10 rounders in the same time it takes to do it with 2 30 rounds, hell some of these tests even showed the shooter to be faster with 10 round mags, it makes no difference.
Personally I'm all for letting people use whatever capacity they want, even though I come from a massively restrictive country. Magazine capacity amounts really make no difference, theres arguments for both sides but when neither side shows something that proves it makes any difference, its pointless arguing it, at most smaller capacity just means people might be more geared towards shooting less, but again if someone wants to shoot 100 rounds, they'll shoot 100 rounds regardless.
[QUOTE=Reagy;51380966]Yeah you might see a point to it but I honestly don't. It makes no difference if a magazine can carry 10, 20, 30 or 250 rounds, if someone wants to shoot that much they'll just load the amount of rounds they want into magazines that'll hold it, plus it makes no difference in how fast someone can shoot either which is normally the main thing used against magazines that can hold 30~ rounds, if you're an average shooter you can nail through 60 rounds in 6 10 rounders in the same time it takes to do it with 2 30 rounds, hell some of these tests even showed the shooter to be faster with 10 round mags, it makes no difference.
Personally I'm all for letting people use whatever capacity they want, even though I come from a massively restrictive country. Magazine capacity amounts really make no difference, theres arguments for both sides but when neither side shows something that proves it makes any difference, its pointless arguing it, at most smaller capacity just means people might be more geared towards shooting less, but again if someone wants to shoot 100 rounds, they'll shoot 100 rounds regardless.[/QUOTE]
Fair enough. I'll have to do more research than, because I don't know enough about the topic to make a really solid stance for/against magazine capacity limits. I believe what you say though, since someone could tear through magazines as fast as they could tear through rounds in a larger mag if they practice enough.
I do think that the better path is better mental health care and management of gun sales. One of the few (very few, since our carbon tax bill got rekt) good things to happen this election was I-1491 being passed. This pretty much states the following:
[quote]A person subject to a protection order may be required to surrender his or her firearms, dangerous weapons, and concealed pistol license while the order is in place. This can happen if four conditions are met: (1) the order restrains the person from harassing, stalking, or threatening an intimate partner, a child of an intimate partner, or the person's own child (an "intimate partner" is a current or former spouse or domestic partner, a person with whom the restrained person has a child in common, or a person with whom the restrained person shares or shared a residence in a dating relationship); (2) the order includes a finding that the restrained person is a credible threat to the physical safety of the intimate partner or the child; (3) the order specifically restrains the person from using or threatening physical force against the intimate partner or child; and (4) the restrained person was given notice and an opportunity to participate in a hearing before the order issued. It is a crime for a person restrained by such an order to possess a firearm.
[/quote]
Any petition to enact this must specify facts (plural) that justify the order, and the order must be given under oath. So it can't be just tossed around. Washington also passed I-594 a while ago, which mandates background checks on every public and private gun exchange or sale except if [B]1.[/B] the exchange or sale is between family members or [B]2.[/B] the exchange involves antique and historically significant firearms. There was some fuss that this also banned handoffs of weapons to people outside of your immediate family, including handing-off a weapon while hunting or at a shooting range, but they are specific exceptions in place for such events.
All told, this is the sort of stuff that would make sense at a national level and avoided getting too tangled in legislation and restrictions, but I doubt we'll ever see such a thing gain favor at the national level. Washington is interesting because its liberal as fuck on the west side but conservative as fuck on the east side, which is super rural. So a lot of the gun control measures have to please both parties. Also, surprisingly, it's still legal to own a suppressor (unlike in California lol)
[editline]16th November 2016[/editline]
see it'd be nice if I could have a discussion about topics like this at my house that didn't involve threats of physical violence :c
God I'm so sick of lying to myself.
Is it worth it to hide for years and flatout deny just so that I won't get ostracized from the local community and have a glimmer a hope that one day I'll be able to be myself and not just a dead horse? I'm not sure at fucking all.
[QUOTE={TFS} Rock Su;51381507]God I'm so sick of lying to myself.
Is it worth it to hide for years and flatout deny just so that I won't get ostracized from the local community and have a glimmer a hope that one day I'll be able to be myself and not just a dead horse? I'm not sure at fucking all.[/QUOTE]
If you're old enough and living in this community makes you unhappy, you should jump ship and move to somewhere else.
I've always just been myself. I don't try to follow trends of what's popular and I would never try to hide who I am from people. Part of who I am is that I can be brutally honest, a trait I accepted later in my teen years, and that have alienated a few people I once considered close friends. I dress in what I want to, I look the way I want to; if I didn't have that freedom I'd feel even shittier than I usually do.
I think that if you can't express who you are and how you feel openly you'll end up hurting yourself more than hurting the people around you, which is a common worry that people have from what I've heard and understand. I'm no professional on the topic, but as people we need to have the freedom to do what we feel is right for ourselves as long as it doesn't cross boundaries for the people you care about. Limiting yourself is an unhealthy trait to have and the worries that come with it will only continue to grow on you, and that's coming from someone who's dealt with it since I was a child.
[QUOTE=Mort Stroodle;51381616]If you're old enough and living in this community makes you unhappy, you should jump ship and move to somewhere else.[/QUOTE]
I honestly I wish I could but a: I have literally almost 0 money on me right now and if I wanted to earn even a single fucking euro, I'd need to get a drivers license first which costs 1000€+ (and while I sort of understand why I'd need one for a proof that I can be mobile) and where the fuck will I ever get that amount of cash.
[QUOTE=Stoffy;51381648]-text-[/QUOTE]
I wish I could be myself, but I have to literally build my social life out of fucking nothing. I was bullied to the oblivion during primary and a decent part of high school (I admit I was a bit of an asshole, but not that much), which made me such a fucking introvert, that I didn't even tried going to a party or something like that. During the time I was practicing for my prom last year, the dance partner I had (she was a really great person to whom I actually confessed my bisexuality lol) decided to drop me out because her parents didn't allowed it 5-6 weeks before the prom because her grades (even though I'm not 100% on that fact). Even though I got her back, I think she kind of despised me a bit after that (prob. because she was yelled at by one of her profs for dropping me). Prom was actually amazing and I had a shitload of fun, but when that was over, I felt that nothing changed. NOW, I did went to a meeting of a board of european students of technology for some social gathering and I for once had a lot of fun. I honestly can't wait to go back there. Now if only I had some money to go on my own during the winter holidays, that would be so great that I'd just cry tears of joy on spot.
God I need a break from my country.
[QUOTE=Grim2o0o;51380401]Prime objective is taking you the fuck out
[sp]to dinner.[/sp][/QUOTE]
what time should i pick you up?
[QUOTE=Berman Slick;51382471]I made my first facepunch friend last night c:[/QUOTE]
Now kiss!
That will never be the correct response to anything.
Ever.
[QUOTE=~Kiwi~v2;51383830]Facepunch.com is not a dating website[/QUOTE]
Quite a few people in this thread alone found somebody on facepunch tho lol
Yeah the amount of dating I know of happening among FP'ers is too damn high lol
now that being said it doesn't always end succesfully but it's something!
Is the fact that I am drinking the night before a test a bad sign? I also am fully cognizant of the fact that I'm delaying my problems for another day, not fixing them, but I can't be arsed to give a damn and the constant anxiety made me wanna disappear. the random weepiness sucks too
And before you know it, there'll be a "Facepunch Dating thread" in GD.
Good lord.
[QUOTE=Grim2o0o;51384266]And before you know it, there'll be a "Facepunch Dating thread" in GD.
Good lord.[/QUOTE]
I'm reminded of the early days of the DMT when half of the thread was dating each other :v:
[QUOTE=Grim2o0o;51384266]And before you know it, there'll be a "Facepunch Dating thread" in GD.
Good lord.[/QUOTE]
22/m/estonia
looking to [B]FUCK[/B]
hang on a minute this isn't the facepunch dating thread?
I've been wasting so much time here
one way to win a boy's heart is to play We Are Number One on loop in a loudspeaker
[QUOTE=SenhorCreeper;51384397]one way to win a boy's heart is to play We Are Number One on loop in a loudspeaker[/QUOTE]
i'd do robbie rotten tbh
[QUOTE=Arbys Watcher;51384401]i'd do robbie rotten tbh[/QUOTE]
[IMG]http://65.media.tumblr.com/e1e54ae99545f8265be6423f986a3d47/tumblr_o4du4fDyEZ1v5hhxmo1_500.png[/IMG]
Of course you would do him.
I went back and watched the original Point Break
the scene where Johnny Utah can't bring himself to shoot Bodhi is the perfect metaphor for my life since August.
[QUOTE=Nintendo-Guy;51383860]Quite a few people in this thread alone found somebody on facepunch tho lol[/QUOTE]
fucking gay
if there's ever an fp dating thread i will be sure to auction off a date with me for charity i expect to raise no less than ten million dollars the competition will be fierce
date me for ONE MILLION DOLLARS
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
