Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3 - Find Makarov: Operation Kingfish - General

uh it's a fan made movie bro the idea being that they shoot shit and have cgi

I see..

[QUOTE=Apache249;32122831]Really? An AC130 shot down by an RPG-7?[/QUOTE] Could be done, RPG7's are free fire, so there's no chance the flares would catch it off. Million to one chance though, I agree [editline]5th September 2011[/editline] I just noticed: At around 3:07... [B]Oh my god Price, a BOMB![/B]

[QUOTE=Zillamaster55;32126641]Could be done, RPG7's are free fire, so there's no chance the flares would catch it off. Million to one chance though, I agree [editline]5th September 2011[/editline] I just noticed: At around 3:07... [B]Oh my god Price, a BOMB![/B][/QUOTE] Except that an RPG would have a huge distance to travel before hitting an AC130 and on top of that RPG7 obviously locked onto the AC130 because it curved straight towards it.

[QUOTE=Raidyr;32124143]It's not a documentary it's a creative project based on an arcade-style video game.[/QUOTE] Still, for a fan-film about a game that supposed to pride itself on ~~realism~~, errors like that really throw it off.

They couldn't have picked a worse place for the last battle scene on the field - I mean in a realistic combat scenario one party kills another in seconds on such a open area. It was nice CGI, however.

bla bla bla nuclear missile bomb

[QUOTE=Trunk Monkay;32130328]Still, for a fan-film about a game that supposed to pride itself on ~~realism~~, errors like that really throw it off.[/QUOTE] CoD hasn't prided itself on realism since you mowed down Nazis by the truckload all by yourself in the very first game. I don't think you know anything about the series. Ok here is how it works, the Barret didn't have recoil because it was setup and used by a great sniper, the RPG followed the AC130 because it used a special seeking warhead, and the daylight raid was Prices idea because fuck you.

[QUOTE=Raidyr;32132638]CoD hasn't prided itself on realism since you mowed down Nazis by the truckload all by yourself in the very first game. I don't think you know anything about the series. Ok here is how it works, the Barret didn't have recoil because it was setup and used by a great sniper, the RPG followed the AC130 because it used a special seeking warhead, and the daylight raid was Prices idea because fuck you.[/QUOTE] .50 cal still has massive recoil even when mounted and there's no such thing as a homing warhead for an rpg7.

[QUOTE=gbtygfvyg;32139855].50 cal still has massive recoil even when mounted and there's [B]no such thing as a homing warhead for an rpg7.[/B][/QUOTE]Its call of duty

Started off strong but got really cliche towards the end.

[QUOTE=JimmyA;32142664]Its call of duty[/QUOTE] My point exactly. [editline]6th September 2011[/editline] [QUOTE=Mad Chatter;32143063]Started off strong but got really cliche towards the end.[/QUOTE] It's based on Call of Duty. I'd be disappointed if it ended with anything less than Price single-handedly holding off an entire squad of Russians with only his sidearm.

[QUOTE=Raidyr;32132638] Ok here is how it works, the Barret didn't have recoil because it was setup and used by a great sniper, the RPG followed the AC130 because it used a special seeking warhead, and the daylight raid was Prices idea because fuck you.[/QUOTE] Even when the .50 cal is mounted, it has some recoil and it kicks up a lot of dust. You can't get a homing "warhead" for an RPG-7, and Price is fucking stupid. Other than that, the video was actually pretty good. [editline]6th September 2011[/editline] [QUOTE=JimmyA;32142664]Its call of duty[/QUOTE] Call of Duty doesn't have homing RPG-7s

[QUOTE=Raidyr;32132638]CoD hasn't prided itself on realism since you mowed down Nazis by the truckload all by yourself in the very first game. I don't think you know anything about the series. Ok here is how it works, the Barret didn't have recoil because it was setup and used by a great sniper, the RPG followed the AC130 because it used a special seeking warhead, and the daylight raid was Prices idea because fuck you.[/QUOTE]smoke weed erryday

Yes. People. I know none of the things I said were realistic. Because it is a video based on Call of Duty. Holy shit. My head is full of fuck. How can you not. Nevermind. [editline]6th September 2011[/editline] Yes. People. I know none of the things I said were realistic. Because it is a video based on Call of Duty. And I was trying to make it seem pseudo realistic. Like how CoD games do it Holy shit. My head is full of fuck. How can you not. Nevermind.

[QUOTE=Zillamaster55;32126641]Could be done, RPG7's are free fire, so there's no chance the flares would catch it off. Million to one chance though, I agree [editline]5th September 2011[/editline] I just noticed: At around 3:07... [B]Oh my god Price, a BOMB![/B][/QUOTE] considering the caliber of the weapons on a AC130 it would be no problem to be engaging targets accurately from over a kilometre away(that's actually a conservative guess). there's no way a RPG7 is reaching out and touching that

Plus, there's no way 1 RPG could totally destroy a AC130. Its not even fucking guided. Would had been better if it had been a 9K38 Igla.

I kind of like the idea of it being prequel to MW2. Very well made, but I, too, didn't buy RPGs locking on and destroying AC-130.

thought this was amazing. Voice acting could be better but a lot of the time I had to pause to decide whether something was CGI or real. also I thought Prices last stand was kinda stupid. They could have made it with him.

They sound like pirates.

By the way, RPGs can lock on in Bad Company 2

[QUOTE=FalcoLombardi;32166538]By the way, RPGs can lock on in Bad Company 2[/QUOTE] With a tracer dart.

[QUOTE=Itsjustguy;32166851]With a tracer dart.[/QUOTE] Still, I don't think RPGs can trace [editline]7th September 2011[/editline] However it does say it uses a special warhead or something ingame I don't know

[QUOTE=Zombii;32119713]I fail to believe that a single RPG impact would cause an AC-130 to rip itself apart, yeah it'd do some damage, but I doubt that it would vaporize.[/QUOTE] Well, if you're going to nitpick about that, don't forget that they are unguided and wouldn't even have the range (or accuracy) to reach an AC-130, which would realistically be flying much higher. [editline]11th September 2011[/editline] I've been beaten

Am I the only one who thought this was horrible? It has cool effects, yes, but so does Transformers. This is just Activision saying "lol we got munny here's a shiny video" The .50 cal was shit, the voice acting was shit, CG was p. cool, and that's about it. Everything else was mediocre or shit. [editline]10th September 2011[/editline] also everything sounded horrible

TORSING GRENAYDE God that voice acting is terrible