[QUOTE=lazyguy;19821010]Well if we're going to claims films as facts then watch [B]Reefer Madness. It's all 100% FACT[/B] like every film and if you do not stop smoking it will happen to you.
[editline]01:57PM[/editline]
PS hemp is made from a different plant to the one you get weed from. Same genus, but the hemp plant contains far less THC.[/QUOTE]
Lol no it's not. Watch The Union and Super High Me. Jesus christ man you really love listening/reading/watching lies don't you? The scientific journal, if you may flip to the accredited pages, is funded by various governments. They won't let it publish anything they dislike. Before you post your silly sources, please review them.
1. I do not believe that Reefer Madness is 100% fact. It's called reductio ad absurdum; I'm saying that using films as a basis for your beliefs is retarded.
2. Holy shit you're paranoid. Yes, various countries may have funds set up to help research. No, Science does not have its content scrutinised and censored by the US government. All papers submitted are peer-reviewed. Any examples of bias means the paper won't be published.
Being a hippie, my two cents on the subject:
Most of your facts where wrong (Talking about first post.), but yeah, Marjuana should be permitted.
Marjuana was illeagalized to save the lumber industry due to the usage of hemp. Government did not give a damn about the people, they just wanted more lumberjacks.
Also, inhailing marjuana isn't dangerous. Nor cancerous. But aslong as we got brainwashed mainstream drones, nobody will agree to vote yes on principal freedom.
[QUOTE=lazyguy;19821552]
2. Holy shit you're paranoid. Yes, various countries may have funds set up to help research. No, Science does not have its content scrutinised and censored by the US government. All papers submitted are peer-reviewed. Any examples of bias means the paper won't be published.[/QUOTE]
Holy shit your naive if you think the U.S. government doesn't have a hand in everything "scientific" these days.
Yeah and they did 9/11 as well :downs:
[QUOTE=lazyguy;19821776]Yeah and they did 9/11 as well :downs:[/QUOTE]
So far you've had nothing to back you up but a "unbiased" scientific journal, This entire thread is full of sources for the positives of weed. I suggest you go look at them before you post.
Just a scientific journal. Pfft, who needs them? We have marijuanacancercure.com! That is clearly a much more professional, unbiased and a better source than one of the world's oldest and most prestigious scientific journals.
[QUOTE=lazyguy;19822013]Just a scientific journal. Pfft, who needs them? We have marijuanacancercure.com! That is clearly a much more professional, unbiased and a better source than one of the world's oldest and most prestigious scientific journals.[/QUOTE]
Did you not read the op or are you just retarded? Please go check the op sources.
[QUOTE=Aaronn;19809036]facepalm.jpg
I've seen a lot worse from people who have never smoked anything.[/QUOTE]
But still it affects him.
[QUOTE=Aaronn;19822053]Did you not read the op or are you just retarded? Please go check the op sources.[/QUOTE]
I will when they get peer reviewed.
[QUOTE=Monkey pie;19822126]But still[B],[/B] it affects him.[/QUOTE]
fixed.
[QUOTE]
I will when they get peer reviewed. [/QUOTE]
Go check their credentials before posting again, so you avoid looking like an idiot please. It makes me feel embarrassed for you.
People have the facts laying in front of them, yet they still continue to believe what they're taught by organisations like D.A.R.E
hahahaha, you still discussing this?
[QUOTE=BlackRainbow;19822571]People have the facts laying in front of them, yet they still continue to believe what they're taught by organisations like D.A.R.E[/QUOTE]
To be honest, they don't want to believe that weed isn't a negative thing. For whatever reasons (scapegoat, druggy family member, dumbasses in their school, ect.), they don't want to believe.
They don't realize that just because their Uncle Jack snorts cocaine, it wasn't weed's fault. Or the trashy dumbasses at their school that smoke weed, it isn't the weed's fault they are trashy/dumb.
At my school we have a clique of about 20 dudes with illegal tattoos all over them about bud (illegal because they were like 13 when they got them). They are stupid ignorant fucks who only smoke because they think it's cool. So people react negatively to weed and them
[QUOTE]hahahaha, you still discussing this? [/QUOTE]
It's a weed discussion thread.
Does using a bong lessen the effect? Since it filters out some of the stuff in it.
[QUOTE=lazyguy;19821010]
PS hemp is made from a different plant to the one you get weed from. Same genus, but the hemp plant contains far less THC.[/QUOTE]
Hemp is illegal because cannabis is illegal.
[QUOTE=lazyguy;19821552]1. I do not believe that Reefer Madness is 100% fact. It's called reductio ad absurdum; I'm saying that using films as a basis for your beliefs is retarded.
[/QUOTE]
Reefer Madness is a pure propaganda film. The Union is factual and much less biased. There you go, making unfair comparisons again.
[QUOTE=Aaronn;19771601]I wish they would stop calling it a drug. It gives it a bad name. Everyone sees drugs as super harmful things that fuck you up. If weed wasn't called a "drug," it wouldn't get labled as badly.[/QUOTE]
It's called a drug because it is a drug. The social stigma behind drugs in general is stupid; it has been in existence for a single century. Drugs have been used for millions of years prior to modern society.
Boy there's a lot of wishful thinking in this thread
[QUOTE=lazyguy;19822863]Boy there's a lot of wishful thinking in this thread[/QUOTE]
"I wish this thread dissapears"
That's what you mean with wishful?
[QUOTE=franz;19822823]
It's called a drug because it is a drug. The social stigma behind drugs in general is stupid; it has been in existence for a single century. Drugs have been used for millions of years prior to modern society.[/QUOTE]
True, it is a drug, but so is alcohol. We just don't usually refer to alcohol as a drug. If we stopped calling weed a drug, and just called it good ole' Mary Jane, there wouldn't be as much negative propaganda.
[QUOTE]Boy there's a lot of wishful thinking in this thread [/QUOTE]
like wishing the Scientific Journal had the total 100% real facts about weed? :saddowns:
[QUOTE]"I wish this thread dissapears"
That's what you mean with wishful? [/QUOTE]
If you're not going to talk about cannabis, and you don't like the thread, don't post here.
[QUOTE=Aaronn;19823160]like wishing the Scientific Journal had the total 100% real facts about weed? :saddowns:[/QUOTE]
It's the most likely to.
[QUOTE=lazyguy;19822013]Just a scientific journal. Pfft, who needs them? We have marijuanacancercure.com! That is clearly a much more professional, unbiased and a better source than one of the world's oldest and most prestigious scientific journals.[/QUOTE]
I can't believe you still haven't moved on from that argument. You're still arguing for the credibility of your articles and ignoring what they even say.
[url]http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/abstract/sci;179/4075/803?maxtoshow=&HITS=10&hits=10&RESULTFORMAT=&fulltext=cannabis&searchid=1&FIRSTINDEX=0&resourcetype=HWCIT[/url]
It's well known that cannabis sacrifices short term memory for deeper thinking and greater creativity. This article states that there is temporary disintegration that occurs only while the subject is high. It doesn't state how the test was done or what "disintegration" even means in this case. Pretty useless study for your argument.
[url]http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/abstract/sci;192/4245/1249?maxtoshow=&HITS=10&hits=10&RESULTFORMAT=&fulltext=cannabis&searchid=1&FIRSTINDEX=0&resourcetype=HWCIT[/url]
Rats are not the same as human beings. They obviously react differently to cannabis. I don't have any problems learning after using cannabis for years. I feel that I sometimes have an advantage over people who don't, as it helps me solve my problems using a different point of view.
[url]http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/summary/sci;309/5732/222c?maxtoshow=&HITS=10&hits=10&RESULTFORMAT=&fulltext=cannabis&searchid=1&FIRSTINDEX=0&resourcetype=HWCIT[/url]
Cannabis affects brain structures during prenatal development. I can't believe you thought this article would prove a point.
Overall, if these articles are your entire argument (which they seem to be), your knowledge of drugs and drug culture is severely limited. Though that point has already been made:
[QUOTE=lazyguy;19681248]Or maybe they lace it with other leaves they find in their garden so they can sell more with the same volume of weed.
But, I mean, that never happens right? :downs:[/QUOTE]
Because a science journal is 100% propaganda and marijuanacancurecancer.com is not
[QUOTE=franz;19823286]I feel that I sometimes have an advantage over people who don't, as it helps me solve my problems using a different point of view.[/QUOTE]
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Thread fucking closed, weed is bad for you and this man is the proof.
[QUOTE=franz;19823286]*long post that totally told lazy guy off and blammed his shitty scientific journal*[/QUOTE]
Oh dear lazyguy, I believe you've just had it spelled out for you :ohdear:
[QUOTE]Because a science journal is 100% propaganda and marijuanacancurecancer.com is not [/QUOTE]
There are about 100 other positive sources sited in this thread and all are more reliable than that one.
[QUOTE]BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Thread fucking closed, weed is bad for you and this man is the proof. [/QUOTE]
I feel so embarrassed for you :ohdear:
[QUOTE=OrDnAs;19823359]Because a science journal is 100% propaganda and marijuanacancurecancer.com is not[/QUOTE]
Seems you haven't learned from your last ban.
[QUOTE=lazyguy;19823372]BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Thread fucking closed, weed is bad for you and this man is the proof.[/QUOTE]
Great maturity and counterargument! Once again showing that your argument is based on your ignorance, lack of knowledge, and obedience to outdated social stigmas.
[QUOTE=franz;19823389]Seems you haven't learned from your last ban.
Great maturity and counterargument![/QUOTE]
you know you win weed is good and everything that is not weed is crap because is the maximun frorm of recreation
[QUOTE=OrDnAs;19823414]you know you win weed is good and everything that is not weed is crap because is the maximun frorm of recreation[/QUOTE]
Nobody said it was the maximum form of recreation. We are arguing against its illegality. It is clearly not negative. And none of you can site any real sources saying that it is.
[QUOTE=Aaronn;19823449]Nobody said it was the maximum form of recreation. We are arguing against its illegality. It is clearly not negative. And none of you can site any real sources saying that it is.[/QUOTE]
Oh I see then.....
Well USA gov is going to legalize weed is pretty damn sure
[QUOTE=OrDnAs;19823491]Oh I see then.....
Well USA gov is going to legalize weed is pretty damn sure[/QUOTE]
Within the next 5 years. Starting with California.
[QUOTE=Aaronn;19823504]Within the next 5 years. Starting with California.[/QUOTE]
I would hope so, then other countries will follow.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.