• Marijuana - The good, the bad, and the unknown
    1,360 replies, posted
[QUOTE=BlackRainbow;19823580]I would hope so, then other countries will follow.[/QUOTE] Canada will follow at least. Maybe Britain. Don't know about anyone else.
Not in the country of mine I am sure
If you look at how many states are pushing different marijuana laws you will see that the reverse of reefer madness, where one state legalizes it then more states do it then canada obediently copys america after about half a year and then bam, weed in north america! Not to sure about any other countries tho.
I would want to try mj at least once in my lifetime, but I couldn't see myself being a regular user. I don't mind people using it on their own perogative. I'm fairly libertarian and I believe its a choice that the government has no right in restricting seeing how as it doesn't do damage to anyone else or even themselves(debatable).
[QUOTE=ubertaco;19772432]I have never tried weed, but thinking about it. What does it feel like.[/QUOTE] It feels like you're being persecuted by the cops 24/7
[QUOTE=lazyguy;19821010]Well if we're going to claims films as facts then watch Reefer Madness. It's all 100% FACT like every film and if you do not stop smoking it will happen to you. [editline]01:57PM[/editline] PS hemp is made from a different plant to the one you get weed from. Same genus, but the hemp plant contains far less THC.[/QUOTE] Wow, it's clear you have no intention of listening to the other side of the argument, I just gave clear examples backing up what I claimed to see before even stating I originally heard it from a documentary, why don't you just get out, it really just seems like you're trolling now, as you completely ignored everything except one little thing you could nitpick at to add to your pointless argument.
[QUOTE=lazyguy;19821010]Well if we're going to claims films as facts then watch Reefer Madness. It's all 100% FACT like every film and if you do not stop smoking it will happen to you. [editline]01:57PM[/editline] PS hemp is made from a different plant to the one you get weed from. Same genus, but the hemp plant contains far less THC.[/QUOTE] I doubt you've even watched Reefer Madness. If you have you'd see what the ignorant mindset about weed was back then. That film was played in theaters all over America and people actually believed that if you smoked this dangerous devil plant called marijuana you would go mentally insane. Your beliefs about weed are based on exactly the same principle, just less extreme. Some films actually give scientific fact and are just as good or even better than your studies. National Geographic for example created a detailed one hour documentary about weed pretty recently. Are you going to dismiss that as bullshit too? Ha! Also hemp contains pretty much no THC. It's impossible to get high off of hemp, yet it is still ILLEGAL to grow it in the USA. That's like making wheat illegal to grow during the 1920's because you can make vodka from it... and even then you can't make weed from hemp.
I wouldn't even care if you people had a decent argument and a way of going about it, so far it's just some persistent wangs who don't know what their talking about, calling weed users morons, when they seem to be the only ones who can post without trying to offend the other side or some random users coming in here, spouting retarded "facts", and then when someone presents a counter agrument and some proof that it isn't true, they never come back.
[QUOTE=Parakon;19826248]I wouldn't even care if you people had a decent argument and a way of going about it, so far it's just some persistent wangs who don't know what their talking about, calling weed users morons, when they seem to be the only ones who can post without trying to offend the other side or some random users coming in here, spouting retarded "facts", and then when someone presents a counter agrument and some proof that it isn't true, they never come back.[/QUOTE] You summed that up perfectly. This is for you Lazyguy. It's a 45 minute long [b]unbiased[/b] documentary by National Geographic about weed, and it makes some excellent points about the good and the bad. They make some points about weed being stronger that I don't agree with. Weed being stronger means you have to smoke less to get the desired effects, which means less smoking. Maybe if you watch it you'll actually learn something and rid your self of a little bit of ignorance. [url]http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-2416320887244340069#[/url] P.S: Don't even try to tell me that National Geographic isn't a scientific or reliable source, because you know damn well that it is. Edit: A quote from the National Geographic video at 20:00: [b]"The us government strictly controls all American marijuana studies. ..... And some scientists claim that if their research might show potential positive medical uses for marijuana their requests are rejected."[/b]
Just to further obliterate lazyguy's argument, here's Irvin Rosenfeld. [MEDIA]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B1NggzEkltM[/MEDIA] He is a successful stockbroker who smokes 10 joints a day of low quality cannabis supplied to him by the government. That's [B]11 ounces every 25 days.[/B] He has to use cannabis because he has multiple congenital cartilaginous exostoses, a bone disease which weed is the best known cure for. He has smoked 10-12 joints a day for 35 years, which is considered excessive. Does it look like he has brain damage? He has taken medical tests and he was just fine. And he doesn't even use a vaporizer or eat the herb.
[QUOTE=Aaronn;19821328]Lol no it's not. Watch The Union and Super High Me. Jesus christ man you really love listening/reading/watching lies don't you? The scientific journal, if you may flip to the accredited pages, is funded by various governments. They won't let it publish anything they dislike. Before you post your silly sources, please review them.[/QUOTE] What the fucking shit, Aaron, he was using sarcasm.
So apparently smoking weed makes it impossible to detect sarcasm.
[QUOTE=franz;19827154]Just to further obliterate lazyguy's argument, here's Irvin Rosenfeld. [MEDIA]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B1NggzEkltM[/MEDIA] He is a successful stockbroker who smokes 10 joint a day of low quality cannabis supplied to him by the government. That's [B]11 ounces every 25 days.[/B] He has to use cannabis because he has multiple congenital cartilaginous exostoses, which weed is the best known cure for. He has smoked 10-12 joints a day for 35 years, which is considered excessive. Does it look like he has brain damage? He has taken medical tests and he was just fine. And he doesn't even use a vaporizer or eat the herb.[/QUOTE] great vid
[QUOTE=lazyguy;19827649]So apparently smoking weed makes it impossible to detect sarcasm.[/QUOTE] Gee, what a wonderful counter argument to my previous two posts. I see you're just here to ninja troll. I'm pretty baked right now. Haha ninja trolls, that sounds funny. Ninja troll attack! Watch it and learn something and form some ridiculous counter argument or go away: [url]http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-2416320887244340069#[/url]
[QUOTE=Aaronn;19823504]Within the next 5 years. Starting with California.[/QUOTE] Yep, tis' on the November ballot, and it [B]will[/B] pass.
[QUOTE=lazyguy;19827649]So apparently smoking weed makes it impossible to detect sarcasm.[/QUOTE] And so you continue to ignore every post except the [I]one[/I] that will give you the slightest bit of a foot hold, just get out already.
Carl Sagan smoked hella weed and has 40 honorary degrees, gg motherfuckers [editline]10:30PM[/editline] also did you know that the USA spends ten times the amount of money on the War on Drugs than it does on combatting human trafficking? good thing they're stopping the WoD bullshit tbh
[QUOTE=Dan The Man;19827245]What the fucking shit, Aaron, he was using sarcasm.[/QUOTE] I couldn't decide if he was ignorant as shit or sarcastic and then I looked at the rest of his posts and decided he was just ignorant as shit. :downs: So I took it seriously
I'm not the one who called Science a shitty journal. [editline]08:43PM[/editline] Actually you must be trolling.
[QUOTE=lazyguy;19846242]I'm not the one who called Science a shitty journal. [editline]08:43PM[/editline] Actually you must be trolling.[/QUOTE] Shush. I believe we've already spelled it all out for you if you will read the above posts. None of your points have any validity. You're sad attempts at just ignoring everything that eliminates your argument is embarassing
and all of you smoke weed and that's dumb!!
[QUOTE=lazyguy;19846242]I'm not the one who called Science a shitty journal. [editline]08:43PM[/editline] Actually you must be trolling.[/QUOTE] I'm not the one who's ignoring a 45 minute National Geographic documentary from 2009 which clearly beats the crap out of all your out dated 70's studies and at the same time defeats most of your arguments. Seriously you must be 12 years old...
[QUOTE=franz;19827154]Just to further obliterate lazyguy's argument, here's Irvin Rosenfeld. [MEDIA]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B1NggzEkltM[/MEDIA] He is a successful stockbroker who smokes 10 joints a day of low quality cannabis supplied to him by the government. That's [B]11 ounces every 25 days.[/B] He has to use cannabis because he has multiple congenital cartilaginous exostoses, a bone disease which weed is the best known cure for. He has smoked 10-12 joints a day for 35 years, which is considered excessive. Does it look like he has brain damage? He has taken medical tests and he was just fine. And he doesn't even use a vaporizer or eat the herb.[/QUOTE] All you dumb shits that still believe marijuana causes brain damage need to watch this right now.
Above post has my axe
[QUOTE=Parakon;19869761]Above post has my axe[/QUOTE] And my sword
[QUOTE=SneakySneak;19870621]And my sword[/QUOTE] My bow?
[QUOTE=BlackRainbow;19859359]All you dumb shits that still believe marijuana causes brain damage need to watch this right now.[/QUOTE] all you flaming dumb shit
[QUOTE=SneakySneak;19870621]And my sword[/QUOTE] And my cock. But I want it back.
OK guys, I have a confession to make. I am not a fifteen-year-old British boy. I am in fact a forty-two year old FBI agent. The reason me and my department go after weed smokers is because it's the only way we can get a hard-on, which we need when we go see a hooker because we can't bear to see the dead wrinkling faces of Prom Queen '86 for another two minutes of loveless humping. [editline]07:17PM[/editline] Godfuckingdamnit Julia at least maybe open your eyes while we do it
Why do people who know nothing about bud walk in here and comment on it like experts? Jesus Christ. Dumb ignorant fucks. "WEED CAUSES BRAIN DAMAGE!!@!1212"
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.