• Aggressive Atheism
    167 replies, posted
I'm a Pastafarian this is offensive to me. :saddowns: ...kidding....
[QUOTE=FacepunchZen;18641613]You all do realize that if atheism was as prevalent in the culture history and society of every nation, like Catholicism or Islam, atheists would try to control the way people practice their religion just like how the Christians try to control homosexuals lives by forbidding them to marry.[/QUOTE] Except atheism promotes equality.
Atheism treats Freedom of speech and equality in the same way religious people treat god's law. Atheists have their trust in these ideas for personal reasons rather than what they are told.
[QUOTE=Hiccuper;18641130]This thread makes me lose faith a little more in humanity. Once again some people manage to confuse ignorant religious people with religious people in general.[/QUOTE] If you're still religious in this age of science and knowledge, then you [B]are[/B] ignorant.
Religon is for peasents.
lolatheists
He seems much more anti-religion than he did actually atheist. I agree with him completely, religion is an evil institution but I still believe in God. Religion and a belief in God are two separate things to me. I don't know how what I said was dumb but okay ghost-rater.
Pat Condell is pretty good, but a bit too paranoid with the whole "musilms are takin over the wooooorld" thing he has going on. [editline]02:06AM[/editline] Also he fairly regularly contradicts himself.
[QUOTE=Negrul1;18654532]Pat Condell is pretty good, but a bit too paranoid with the whole "musilms are takin over the wooooorld" thing he has going on. [/QUOTE] Muslims [b]are[/b] taking over the world. We're too accommodating to their faith because we fear being called a bigot. Or getting shot.
One group says X god is right and if you don't think so, you go to hell. Another group says Y god is right and if you don't think so, you go to hell. Another group says Z god is right and if you don't think so, you go to hell. The reason the people believe their group in the first place is because of how they were raised. Therefore, they are all just as equally correct as all the rest. Choose one!
The guy is right on about 90% of it, but he is wrong when he states that religion has no positive aspects about halfway through. I'm about as athiest as you can get but to claim that religion has no positive effects, you're just being blind. Do they outweigh the negative effects? Not a chance, but they exist. [QUOTE=SgtTupelo;18647855]Remember Middle Age? The funky time ruled pretty much by the church? Check this out: [IMG]http://img515.imageshack.us/img515/236/darkagesb.gif[/IMG][/QUOTE] i absolutely love graphs that don't even have a scale on the y axis!! if you're going to support one side don't pull bullshit graphs from clearly biased sources (nobeliefs, brilliant)
[QUOTE=BricknHead;18655316]The guy is right on about 90% of it, but he is wrong when he states that religion has no positive aspects about halfway through. I'm about as athiest as you can get but to claim that religion has no positive effects, you're just being blind. Do they outweigh the negative effects? Not a chance, but they exist. i absolutely love graphs that don't even have a scale on the y axis!! if you're going to support one side don't pull bullshit graphs from clearly biased sources (nobeliefs, brilliant)[/QUOTE] Invent an accurate, quantitative unit of measurement for scientific advancement and you might just win the Nobel prize. [editline]09:34PM[/editline] But no there aren't any positives that couldn't be done without religion.
we need backup in the youtube comment we were just hit by a wave of jews for jesus people, and now the christian science people are rallying
[QUOTE=Hiccuper;18641130]This thread makes me lose faith a little more in humanity. Once again some people manage to confuse ignorant religious people with religious people in general.[/QUOTE] To be religious is to be ignorant.
[QUOTE=POLOPOZOZO;18656193]Invent an accurate, quantitative unit of measurement for scientific advancement and you might just win the Nobel prize. [editline]09:34PM[/editline] But no there aren't any positives that couldn't be done without religion.[/QUOTE] I'd rather use quantitative data than some extremely vague concept. Perhaps we could go with a strict qualification for what exactly qualifies a scientific achievement, and then simply put a number in? That graph is just as bad as the "evidence" that religious zealots use - information from a biased source (in their case, the bible) without any backup data or actual quantitative qualification. I prefer something that doesn't make me look like a prick to my opponent. Something that shows you're serious. "Nobelief.com" doesn't show that. I guarantee if you were at a formal debate and pulled out that graph you'd get laughed off the podium. And religion isn't required in [I]modern[/I] society for any actual development, but it was actually critical for pre-civilization development. It served as the basis for laws and centralized governments. Civilization was born from religion, just because we don't need it any longer doesn't mean it never served a purpose.
I hope you're not saying that Christianity didn't set back scientific development.
every source is biased because everyone is biased Edit: [QUOTE=Zeke129;18659357]I hope you're not saying that Christianity didn't set back scientific development.[/QUOTE] What scientific development did they set back?
[QUOTE=SgtTupelo;18647855]Remember Middle Age? The funky time ruled pretty much by the church? Check this out: [IMG]http://img515.imageshack.us/img515/236/darkagesb.gif[/IMG][/QUOTE] That wasn't caused by Christianity itself, rather it was caused by the fall of the Roman Empire. Sure Christianity(Roman Catholicism in particular) held it's role of holding it back, but that isn't necessarily caused by religion. It could have just as easily been caused by the state of affairs of Europe during that period. Notice that the graph only applies to Europe. The Middle East was doing very well technologically and the empires and nations there were extremely religious(just as radical as the Catholic Church during that time).
[QUOTE=SgtTupelo;18647855]Remember Middle Age? The funky time ruled pretty much by the church? Check this out: [IMG]http://img515.imageshack.us/img515/236/darkagesb.gif[/IMG][/QUOTE] That's biased bullshit made by atheist, how bout you look at the massive gap that's happening during these ages where there are loads of atheist thinking they are better than everyone else simply because they use the internet alot. And how the fuck do you measure science? seriously get real facts rather than some made up joke.
I was shouted at by going to the woman's district in the western wall in Jerusalem when I went there for the first time. I was just looking for the closest path downstairs. I had NO idea they divided it to two parts; women and men. What even MORE disgusts me than the fact that they divided it - the men have about 70% of it and the women only have 30%.
[QUOTE=Lf757;18661928]That's biased bullshit made by atheist, how bout you look at the massive gap that's happening during these ages where there are loads of atheist thinking they are better than everyone else simply because they use the internet alot. And how the fuck do you measure science? seriously get real facts rather than some made up joke.[/QUOTE] It's pretty real. In the church ages, anything against their will = death or jail. And most science was against their will.
[QUOTE=Lf757;18661928]seriously get real facts rather than some made up joke.[/QUOTE] Dude why are you protesting our faith
I have faith that science is right. Oh wait no I don't need to because science is verifiable.
Which reminds me. Today I saw a couple of believers having an argument with one of my friends (an atheist) I budged in and said "Oh, okay, you believe in God, right? Why don't you believe in the Greek mythology, the chinese buddhas, hinduism, all of those other religions? You're some kind of an atheist yourself, you know." Having no reason he mumbled angrily and left.
[QUOTE=Lf757;18661928]That's biased bullshit made by atheist, how bout you look at the massive gap that's happening during these ages where there are loads of atheist thinking they are better than everyone else simply because they use the internet alot. And how the fuck do you measure science? seriously get real facts rather than some made up joke.[/QUOTE] That last line... tehehe.
[QUOTE=Zeke129;18659357]I hope you're not saying that Christianity didn't set back scientific development.[/QUOTE] of course not the decline wasn't caused by it alone, but it was a fairly substantial factor. It was more due to the fall of the roman empire, but the era of hostility created by the warring churches didn't help, nor did the notorious reputation of the church either ex communicating or executing major scientists and physicists of the time I'm saying don't use some joke of a fucking graph from a source that isn't objective that is completely counterproductive because it makes our side look like an ass seriously, using a graph like that is the same as aligning yourself with the wave of the new high school liberals (kids who got into politics because it's cool to like obama). Don't try to associate with the actual people who know what they're talking about if you're going to spew that sort of unbacked shit around. The core of atheism is a logical and skeptical mind, one that questions authority. We need empirical and / or qualitative evidence to support something. If you lackadaisically just accept some stupid shit like that, then you're both an idiot and probably not that serious in your position, probably just doing it as a way to be a rebel and to strike back. The atheists that aren't skeptics aren't worth two shits. [editline]10:53AM[/editline] [QUOTE=mr-kaki;18662574]Which reminds me. Today I saw a couple of believers having an argument with one of my friends (an atheist) I budged in and said "Oh, okay, you believe in God, right? Why don't you believe in the Greek mythology, the chinese buddhas, hinduism, all of those other religions? You're some kind of an atheist yourself, you know." Having no reason he mumbled angrily and left.[/QUOTE] that's fucking stupid if he believes in his own religion he is not an atheist athiest is "without theism" without religion He either walked off because he was stupid and didn't realize this, or thought you were being a little close-minded self righteous twat
the first part of that was a really bad Simile [quote=Crazy Atheist]"like a Street thug who calls the police when his victims fight back"[/quote] it is really retarded when Athiests fight against religion. we have been here for a long time. and its gonna take a while to uproot us from our beliefs. people like this should just stop trying to convert even though we try and convert people and some just cant accept there are other religions and beliefs. maybe we need a new major religion like when Jesus fought back against Judaism. my friends would know what im talking about Mr. SUNISM [editline]04:03PM[/editline] [QUOTE=mr-kaki;18662574]Which reminds me. Today I saw a couple of believers having an argument with one of my friends (an atheist) I budged in and said "Oh, okay, you believe in God, right? Why don't you believe in the Greek mythology, the chinese buddhas, hinduism, all of those other religions? You're some kind of an atheist yourself, you know." Having no reason he mumbled angrily and left.[/QUOTE] let them be. its NOT YOUR BUSINESS so stay the fuck out of it our beliefs so fuck off i told an atheist who was arguing with my Christian friend and told him he was a douche JUST for arguing with somebody. not BEING an atheist but just fighting against his beliefs [editline]04:04PM[/editline] [QUOTE=SgtTupelo;18647855]Remember Middle Age? The funky time ruled pretty much by the church? Check this out: [IMG]http://img515.imageshack.us/img515/236/darkagesb.gif[/IMG][/QUOTE] one last thing: that looks like it was put together by my 12 year old severely autistic brother
[QUOTE=Mr_Sun;18662849]that looks like it was put together by my 12 year old severely autistic brother[/QUOTE] Atleast your severely autistic brother understands how religion holds back science, unlike your self. If he's retarded you must be some kind of subhuman species.
Lol, I find atheism funny, always thinking their badass.
[QUOTE=thisispain;18631654]Obviously he would be British.[/QUOTE] Ohhh fuck off... The guy makes good points, just goes to show that you should never believe the media, make up your own mind about things and don't listen to the press.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.