I don't know what I would do with a 17" CRT, probably kill myself.
1600x900
[QUOTE=DiscoBiscut;20949140]I seem to be fairly uncommon at 1280x1024.
Very square.[/QUOTE]
Same. It's hip to be a square.
3840 x 1080 all the way :3:
32:9 represent!
[img]http://img13.imageshack.us/img13/1255/329represent.png[/img]
Two 24 inch 1080p displays are not to be meddled with.
And neither is the page, thumbnail that thing man.
1:1 represent?
1400×1050
Totally standard
1280x800 on my laptop 1024x768 on my desktop.
1680x1050
1366*768
Odd numbers, I know.
1920x1080 and 1280x800
Works pretty well.
[QUOTE=Valdrone;20952123]
3480x1080 image[/QUOTE]
What the fuck, man.
1280x800 16:10
1280x1024
5:4 aspect ratio sucks :saddowns:. Next one i buy will definitely be a 24inch 1920x1200. Just need to buy a better computer first.
[editline]02:59PM[/editline]
[QUOTE=milkandcooki;20952845]1:1 represent?[/QUOTE]
Seriously? I want pics of that monitor.
1600x900 widescreen LCD, was a pretty big change from my 1280x1024 CRT monitor.
Dude, this is around about the 3rd thread you've posted about monitors. Give it a break.
1680x1050 or something like that.
Wow, I'm in that 3.29% that have a DX 11 card on Windows 7 :D
2560x1600
quantum monitor represent
it's 15 inches and 30 inches at the same time
1280x1024
don't want to buy a new monitor for a shitty netbook
2440x900 represeeennnt, dualies. :3
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
