• Corruption in gaming journalism discussion and update thread.
    15,084 replies, posted
[QUOTE=EmperorVagak;46327665]Apparently GamersGate (not #gamergate) has been dogpiled on during this whole chaos. [IMG]http://i.imgur.com/wzli8D1.png[/IMG] [url]http://gamergateharassment.tumblr.com/post/100902760368/known-retail-video-game-site-gamersgate-com-is[/url][/QUOTE] Why doesn't this make the news... People who are anti-GG sending threats AND who don't even play video games, just wow...
Is anyone here with social media spreading the stream? I would strongly recommend to do that.
[QUOTE=Jamsponge;46327741]I can already envision the excuse for this... "_____"[/QUOTE] It's alright, Anita has mailed herself another death threat by now, no excuses needed.
[QUOTE=EmperorVagak;46327665]Apparently GamersGate (not #gamergate) has been dogpiled on during this whole chaos. [IMG]http://i.imgur.com/wzli8D1.png[/IMG] [url]http://gamergateharassment.tumblr.com/post/100902760368/known-retail-video-game-site-gamersgate-com-is[/url][/QUOTE] #actuallyitsaboutharresement
[QUOTE=e_k_M;46326719]max started spamming agg posts all over his blog and its really bothering me [t]http://a.pomf.se/dejpta.jpg[/t] he's using the same "LOOK AT ALL THOSE WORDS" thing that lw did with that one IRC chat to make it look bad[/QUOTE] They didn't even count "corrupt" or "ethical" which are more likely to come up in a serious conversation. [QUOTE=Rocâ„¢;46327757]Why doesn't this make the news... People who are anti-GG sending threats AND who don't even play video games, just wow...[/QUOTE] If it makes the news they're going to somehow blame it on pro-GG
[QUOTE=Lord of Boxes;46326731]Will we just ignore him. He's chronically stupid and we should stop paying attention. [b]He'll stop and relize what a pathetic human being he is[/b], He might be lurking as well.[/QUOTE] No he won't. In the process of being de-modded and then being banned, he's gotten worse and worse. He was practically tolerable back when he was a mod and had a reason to restrain himself.
[QUOTE=Tamschi;46325335]Oh right, judging by your post count you'll run into him a lot more. Wasn't there some Facepunch enhancement script where you could block people?[/QUOTE] Facepunch already has a block feature. Never used it though, it's pretty much just text on my screen lol. And hell, even shitty posters have something good to say once every blue moon, so I give people that chance.
Christina Sommers Will be appearing on a King of Pol Stream soon [URL]https://twitter.com/CHSommers/status/526050295110176771[/URL] hopefully KOP gets someone like Sargon to Manage the conversation.
Somehow I don't like the idea of those two in the same chat. KingOfPol is going to go off on another Jew rant during it, isn't he? :v:
[QUOTE=ForgottenKane;46328649]Facepunch already has a block feature. Never used it though, it's pretty much just text on my screen lol. And hell, even shitty posters have something good to say once every blue moon, so I give people that chance.[/QUOTE] I always thought the people that used it were stupid. You can't participate in most debates and you're pretty much asking for people to talk shit behind your back, specially when you announce that someone's blocked.
[QUOTE=ForgottenKane;46328697]Somehow I don't like the idea of those two in the same chat. KingOfPol is going to go off on another Jew rant during it, isn't he? :v:[/QUOTE] He's getting another Feminist on the stream, [URL]https://twitter.com/JennieBharaj[/URL] [editline]25th October 2014[/editline] [QUOTE=Manibogi;46328698]I always thought the people that used it were stupid. You can't participate in most debates and you're pretty much asking for people to talk shit behind your back, specially when you announce that someone's blocked.[/QUOTE] Blocking people is stupid there's literally no point. it's why i see the [URL="http://www.theblockbot.com/"]SJW Twitter Block List[/URL] To be so destructive.
[QUOTE=Fixed from Wii60] [b]*KOP needs as a requirement to get someone[/b] like Sargon to manage the conversation.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=HoodedSniper;46324073]This is disgusting, anyone who had a shred of respect for her just look at this. [IMG]http://i.imgur.com/zqNg7ua.png[/IMG][/QUOTE] You do know that she isn't saying men are biologically preconditioned to be violent with this statement right? She is saying that the cultural expectation of masculinity is something that harms men. here is a an excerpt from the piece she posted in her later tweet that people linked here. [quote]Are these shooters psychopaths or sociopaths? Maybe. But what’s a sociopath? It’s a person who lacks empathy. “Well,” says Katz, “we socialize empathy out of boys all the time.” If we aren’t allowing boys to experience and express vulnerability, pain, and fear because that’s somehow connected to weakness (a feminine quality), then how are they going to be able to relate to the experiences of others? “Sociopathy is the extreme manifestation of the way we socialize boys in our society,” he says.[/quote]
[IMG]https://pbs.twimg.com/media/B0z_1ncCMAEBUwd.png[/IMG] Professional Victim 24/7
[QUOTE=Valnar;46328797]You do know that she isn't saying men are biologically preconditioned to be violent with this statement right? She is saying that the cultural expectation of masculinity is something that harms men. here is a an excerpt from the piece she posted in her later tweet that people linked here.[/QUOTE] Society usually encourages males to overcome their adversities. Some take it to the extreme, most don't.
Someone found a 3 Hour C-SPAN Interview with Christina Sommers [video=youtube;hkFT6YTnHRs]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hkFT6YTnHRs[/video]
[QUOTE=Valnar;46328797]You do know that she isn't saying men are biologically preconditioned to be violent with this statement right? She is saying that the cultural expectation of masculinity is something that harms men. here is a an excerpt from the piece she posted in her later tweet that people linked here.[/QUOTE] We know that, her statement is shit regardless as it has no bearing AT ALL on the shooting that shes using to promote herself with. That is why its fucking disgusting and shes horrible. She is using it as bait on top of that for obvious reasons. Also to bring something up such as "Masculinity" for a school shooting is absolutely vile, mental illness is the what needs to be brought up.
[QUOTE=HoodedSniper;46324073]This is disgusting, anyone who had a shred of respect for her just look at this. [IMG]http://i.imgur.com/zqNg7ua.png[/IMG][/QUOTE] my favorite response is from /r/tumblrinaction "Not a coincidence every single Nobel physics prize has gone to a man in the last 50 years. The pattern is connected to ideas of toxic masculinity in our culture." [editline]25th October 2014[/editline] [IMG]http://i.imgur.com/CH83W2x.png[/IMG]
Livestream starting in 30 minutes, sending out invites now: [url]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ynDCUi2sjwI[/url] [video=youtube;ynDCUi2sjwI]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ynDCUi2sjwI[/video]
[QUOTE=Wii60;46328821][IMG]https://pbs.twimg.com/media/B0z_1ncCMAEBUwd.png[/IMG] Professional Victim 24/7[/QUOTE] Why are we talking about this here? She's barely relevant.
We've got one or two open spots. If you want to join the stream feel free to PM me. Also, Ithon and Codemaster85, please check your PMs.
[URL]https://archive.today/Km5Cu[/URL] Lawyer battle incoming [IMG]http://i.imgur.com/9FUmA9u.png[/IMG] Also leonard j crabs email is a fake email for somethingawful.com
[IMG]http://u.cubeupload.com/Coldmute/vFGh2k.png[/IMG] Seems people sent Jon a bunch of stuff, and he's better informed and alright with whole thing. In case anyone was worried about his posts last night.
i am glad Jon Didnt turn to the uninformed side. may the Ech be with you
Of course it's Something Awful. They really do live up to their name as of late, don't they?
[IMG]http://i.imgur.com/pcEyS8u.jpg[/IMG] ayy lmao [editline]25th October 2014[/editline] [IMG]http://i.imgur.com/EOo9YeP.png[/IMG]
[QUOTE=Wii60;46329755]i am glad Jon Didnt turn to the uninformed side. may the Ech be with you[/QUOTE] A bunch of twitter users wailed on him for calling someone a retard. Of course he's not going to be uninformed.
Holy shit, these people are morons.
[QUOTE=Wii60;46328974]my favorite response is from /r/tumblrinaction "Not a coincidence every single Nobel physics prize has gone to a man in the last 50 years. The pattern is connected to ideas of toxic masculinity in our culture." [editline]25th October 2014[/editline] [IMG]http://i.imgur.com/CH83W2x.png[/IMG][/QUOTE] lol fucking chris chan shouldn't he busy hating the "darkies" because they get in the way of his quest to get some china?
[QUOTE=Valnar;46328797]You do know that she isn't saying men are biologically preconditioned to be violent with this statement right? She is saying that the cultural expectation of masculinity is something that harms men. here is a an excerpt from the piece she posted in her later tweet that people linked here.[/QUOTE] Let me fill you in on a few things 1. Sociopaths don't exist. The actual clinical term is psychopath, and the majority of psychopaths are rarely violent openly believe it or not. The key factor in a prediction of whether a clinical psychopath using violence to solve problems is IQ. Low IQ psychopaths end up in jail early in life. 2. You don't "become" a psychopath. This isn't a hannibal lecter movie, in real life psychopathy is directly correlated with low functioning of the amygdala. This is primarily a birth condition, secondarily an early development condition. Of the children who do have early life experiences that are correlated with psychopathy, it is almost invariably child abuse or early life trauma that influences it. Psychopaths dont feel empathy because they literally cannot feel empathy. Not because someone told them being a "man" was about not caring about other people for fucks sake. Secondly this is patented bullshit, nearly all the mass shooters in recent years have been one thing: Social outcasts. Of course feminists don't want to address this because it doesn't follow the narrative that men are violent because of "toxic masculinity" and it also avoids addressing the tacit implication that male peers suffer significantly worse bullying and social exclusion than their female peers on average. Jackson Katz, who she is directing to there, doesn't have a fucking clue what hes talking about.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.