Corruption in gaming journalism discussion and update thread.
15,084 replies, posted
[QUOTE=Psycho9182;46451176][URL]http://archive.today/CTiPV[/URL]
[IMG]http://i.somethingawful.com/forumsystem/emoticons/emot-colbert.gif[/IMG][/QUOTE]
She left IGF judging after IGF told her to stop posting dumb shit like that
now SJW's are angry at the IGF too.
including ben kuchera
[url]http://archive.today/mmQih[/url]
Wikipedia's Arbitration Committee is taking a look at the Gamergate article.
/gg/ is flipping shit
[URL="https://8chan.co/gg/res/471658.html#471658"]https://8chan.co/gg/res/471658.html#471658[/URL]
[QUOTE=Wii60;46451190]She left IGF judging after IGF told her to stop posting dumb shit like that
now SJW's are angry at the IGF too.
including ben kuchera
[url]http://archive.today/mmQih[/url][/QUOTE]
OH MAN ITS NOT LIKE YOUR JUDGING PEOPLES HOPES AND DREAMS OR SOME SHIT
FUCK
[IMG]http://i.imgur.com/nFRsxZg.jpg[/IMG]
[QUOTE=Wii60;46451496][IMG]http://i.imgur.com/nFRsxZg.jpg[/IMG][/QUOTE]
if they do go through with it, its going to piss off a TON of people. Its a fucking service that is funded by fans/customers, it shouldn't ever have censorship unless its straight up terrorist stuff.
[QUOTE=Pteradactyl;46443694][URL]https://twitter.com/radicalbytes/status/530851798043877376[/URL]
[IMG]http://i.imgur.com/FvBJpmc.png[/IMG]
Remember how feminists absolutely loooooved the game Fat Princess?
You make girls pretty and they complain. You make girls fat and they complain. You cannot please these people.[/QUOTE]
[url]http://techraptor.net/content/interview-daniel-vavra[/url]
[quote][b]Do you think that the accusations of corruption are as deep as many would have us believe?[/b]
...And they will never be happy. If you don’t have a gay character in your game, you are homophobic, if you do have gay character in your game, you are homophobic, because they don’t like the character. If women in your game look good, you are sexist, if they look bad, you are sexist, if you can fight with them, you are misogynistic, if you can’t fight with them, you are using them as objects, if you don’t have any women, because there is no correct way how to have them, you are misogynistic.
It’s a witch hunt and it’s affecting my artistic freedom.[/quote]
[QUOTE=G-Strogg;46449498][img]http://puu.sh/cK6z9/a9ed0f9c26.png[/img]
Brianna confirms that yes, they just want to hear people say nice things about them.[/QUOTE]
Can we code golf this?
[URL]https://archive.today/7vm6F[/URL]
"sry sry plz dont hit me"
-IGF
meanwhile more fun tweets involving the judge in question
[IMG]https://pbs.twimg.com/media/B2DT6zICMAAu13f.png[/IMG]
[IMG]https://pbs.twimg.com/media/B2Bz-jkIgAEDHtP.png[/IMG]
[IMG]https://pbs.twimg.com/media/B2CLmQmIAAEgFKd.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]https://pbs.twimg.com/media/B2B0BoSIIAE0L3E.png[/IMG]
[IMG]https://pbs.twimg.com/media/B2Cdo0VCAAAEPmU.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]https://pbs.twimg.com/media/B2CfwGXCcAANLOK.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]https://pbs.twimg.com/media/B2Csd-yIIAA_p_o.png[/IMG]
[IMG]https://pbs.twimg.com/media/B2CsKviIUAAxC4g.png[/IMG]
[IMG]https://pbs.twimg.com/media/B2CkjbECAAAP0v2.png[/IMG]
[IMG]https://pbs.twimg.com/media/B2ClQ6kCcAAVj7V.png[/IMG]
[IMG]https://pbs.twimg.com/media/B2Ci57oCMAABpF_.png[/IMG]
[quote][img]https://pbs.twimg.com/media/B2Ci57oCMAABpF_.png[/img][/quote]
Yeah, this one especially ticked me off. Screw her.
[QUOTE=Ayane-152;46444520]Sargon is on quite a roll
[video=youtube;DYhEA3NZ1rc]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DYhEA3NZ1rc[/video][/QUOTE]
the guy who sargon is replying to in the video got massively butthurt and took to twitter to respond
[IMG]http://i.imgur.com/NymRMRE.png[/IMG]
someone came in to talk with the puppet guy.
the result (the purple av is the guy who made the puppet vid)
[URL]https://archive.today/ncvpe[/URL]
[QUOTE=Wii60;46450602]note that anita and friends want to censor the internet
[url]http://ownnator.tumblr.com/post/102111034335/this-just-in-anita-sarkeesian-co-have-begun[/url][/QUOTE]
The MRAs would have such a field day with making that gender-clause backfire :v:
[editline]10th November 2014[/editline]
[QUOTE=1239the;46451070][IMG]http://puu.sh/cKoay/98185529d6.png[/IMG][/QUOTE]
The [I]domestic violence[/I] tag really ties it together.
[editline]10th November 2014[/editline]
[QUOTE=Wii60;46451988][URL]https://archive.today/7vm6F[/URL]
"sry sry plz dont hit me"
-IGF
meanwhile more fun tweets involving the judge in question
[ridiculousness][/QUOTE]
Yes, [I]please[/I] quit judging things with your terrible bias.
(Verification though. Please post archive links.)
[editline]10th November 2014[/editline]
[QUOTE=Wii60;46452061][...]
someone came in to talk with the puppet guy.
the result (the purple av is the guy who made the puppet vid)
[URL]https://archive.today/ncvpe[/URL][/QUOTE]
Wow, he's incredibly demeaning.
That's by far the most unlikeable kind of personality as far as I am concerned.
[editline]10th November 2014[/editline]
Arguing with him is most likely completely pointless, he seems so utterly self-absorbed and in his echo-chamber that the only thing that could turn him around would be people getting arrested (and even that's doubtful).
Even Chu seems sane in comparison.
[editline]10th November 2014[/editline]
Ahaha oh wow, David Rosen actually blocked me :suicide:
(My open letter is pinned on my Twitter though, so I somewhat get if he wants nothing to do with me.)
I'm convinced these people just talk because they like the sound of their own voice, how else can some one be so fucking idiotic? It's mind boggling.
... So if we took Mattie's comment out of context, what exactly [I]was[/I] the context? Because if it was a joke, she probably shouldn't have made a joke about biased judging based on arbitrary criteria when the organisation of which she is a part is being scrutinised due to suspicion of biased judging based on arbitrary criteria.
[url]https://archive.today/7vm6F[/url] IGF caves, what did you expect?
[QUOTE=Wii60;46451988][URL]https://archive.today/7vm6F[/URL]
"sry sry plz dont hit me"
-IGF
meanwhile more fun tweets involving the judge in question
-snip-[/QUOTE]
combined a screencap of your post with IGF's statement for general info distribution purposes. If anyone wants it: [url]https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/16970274/Gamergate/IGFmattiebrice.png[/url]
[QUOTE=Thlis;46449510]it's == to check equivalence dipshit.[/QUOTE]
Java's compiler always teaches me this the hard way.
[QUOTE=G-Strogg;46449515]yeah the funny part is that the code won't compile.
[editline]9th November 2014[/editline]
here's a more effective if-clause
[code]if(tweeter==gamerGater || tweet == negative){
cout << "Block" << endl;
}
[/code][/QUOTE]
If only Programming King wasn't just limited to one whole section...
[QUOTE=Kralizec;46451248]Wikipedia's Arbitration Committee is taking a look at the Gamergate article.
/gg/ is flipping shit
[URL="https://8chan.co/gg/res/471658.html#471658"]https://8chan.co/gg/res/471658.html#471658[/URL][/QUOTE]
Wait a second...I thought ArbCom was already taking notice with those sanctions mentioned on the article talk page already in place?
[QUOTE=Ithon;46452524][url]https://archive.today/7vm6F[/url] IGF caves, what did you expect?[/QUOTE]
Those SJWs had to inform them the patriarchy was warping their views, and how horrible sexist they were to fire mattie for making a joke that there is corruption within the IGF.
[QUOTE=Zet;46452811]Those SJWs had to inform them the patriarchy was warping their views, and how horrible sexist they were to fire mattie for making a joke that there is corruption within the IGF.[/QUOTE]
I thought mattie resigned, did i misunderstand the situation?
they didnt even fire her, they were like "pls stop" and she's like "ha ha im done with igf for asking me to stop insulting people", she quit by herself
[QUOTE=Wii60;46452061]the guy who sargon is replying to in the video got massively butthurt and took to twitter to respond
[IMG]http://i.imgur.com/NymRMRE.png[/IMG]
someone came in to talk with the puppet guy.
the result (the purple av is the guy who made the puppet vid)
[URL]https://archive.today/ncvpe[/URL][/QUOTE]
I'm really just sitting here confused, why is it so hard for someone to act professional in their fucking job? I'm just imagining someone working retail and just straight up telling the customer how shit in taste of purchases is, then crying out saying it was the customer's fault when they get caught and fired. They would also probably refuse to serve black people because they don't real to them.
Also these people remind me of the latest trend of youtube pranksters. They do shit that they know will piss people off, and run around going "it's just a joke".
[editline]11/20/14 [/editline] Just realized i quoted the wrong post, i meant to quote the really fucking long IGF stuff.
[QUOTE=WastedJamacan;46452858]I thought mattie resigned, did i misunderstand the situation?[/QUOTE]
She did. SJWs are warping to make it look the IGF fired her for making a joke that could affect people's futures.
[QUOTE=Psycho9182;46452966]I'm really just sitting here confused, why is it so hard for someone to act professional in their fucking job? I'm just imagining someone working retail and just straight up telling the customer how shit in taste of purchases is, then crying out saying it was the customer's fault when they get caught and fired. They would also probably refuse to serve black people because they don't real to them.
Also these people remind me of the latest trend of youtube pranksters. They do shit that they know will piss people off, and run around going "it's just a joke".[/QUOTE]
[img]https://warosu.org/data/lit/img/0048/05/1398199467610.jpg[/img]
[QUOTE=Wii60;46450602]note that anita and friends want to censor the internet
[url]http://ownnator.tumblr.com/post/102111034335/this-just-in-anita-sarkeesian-co-have-begun[/url][/QUOTE]
MRAs would make this backfire SO FUCKING HARD. :v:
[QUOTE=Wii60;46451988][URL]https://archive.today/7vm6F[/URL]
"sry sry plz dont hit me"
-IGF
meanwhile more fun tweets involving the judge in question
[IMG]https://pbs.twimg.com/media/B2DT6zICMAAu13f.png[/IMG]
[IMG]https://pbs.twimg.com/media/B2Bz-jkIgAEDHtP.png[/IMG]
[IMG]https://pbs.twimg.com/media/B2CLmQmIAAEgFKd.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]https://pbs.twimg.com/media/B2B0BoSIIAE0L3E.png[/IMG]
[IMG]https://pbs.twimg.com/media/B2Cdo0VCAAAEPmU.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]https://pbs.twimg.com/media/B2CfwGXCcAANLOK.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]https://pbs.twimg.com/media/B2Csd-yIIAA_p_o.png[/IMG]
[IMG]https://pbs.twimg.com/media/B2CsKviIUAAxC4g.png[/IMG]
[IMG]https://pbs.twimg.com/media/B2CkjbECAAAP0v2.png[/IMG]
[IMG]https://pbs.twimg.com/media/B2ClQ6kCcAAVj7V.png[/IMG]
[IMG]https://pbs.twimg.com/media/B2Ci57oCMAABpF_.png[/IMG][/QUOTE]
This is so awesome! Look at how many deeply biased people recused themselves from judging!
[URL="https://8chan.co/gg/res/476266.html"]8chan discusses[/URL] a guerilla advertising campaign for GamerGate, focusing on San Francisco Bay Area.
[QUOTE]Instead of pooling together thousands of dollars for a single billboard, why don't we just design a GamerGate business card that people can then download and have a company print out a 100 for like ten bucks? You could leave them in restaurants, schools, and malls.[/QUOTE]
Sounds like a good idea to me.
[QUOTE=GuitarMonkey;46453407][URL="https://8chan.co/gg/res/476266.html"]8chan discusses[/URL] a guerilla advertising campaign for GamerGate, focusing on San Francisco Bay Area.
Sounds like a good idea to me.[/QUOTE]
...What would that achieve though?
Inform people, really. Visibility that isn't filtered through mainstream media.
IMO bringing real life into this in any way doesn't seem like a good move.
[QUOTE=adnzzzzZ;46453498]IMO bringing real life into this in any way doesn't seem like a good move.[/QUOTE]
Too late for that with all those "not biased" interviews in the news, etc.
[QUOTE=GuitarMonkey;46453461]Inform people, really. Visibility that isn't filtered through mainstream media.[/QUOTE]
I don't think it's necessary in the slightest to inform the general public about this, they aren't related and I doubt they'll care enough to do anything. Escalating it to mainstream media by Anita and co was a stupid idea for them, and it's a stupid idea here.
Anti-GG might have made this into a PR war thinking that bullying everyone into submission means they win, but playing that game isn't going to go anywhere. Stay on target, publicise all the corrupt and stupid shit done by them, make clear this isn't safe for advertisers, and don't give two shits about people defaming the name. You don't have to make yourself out to be the good guy to win, all you need is to make clear to everyone how shit Gawker is.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.