• Corruption in gaming journalism discussion and update thread.
    15,084 replies, posted
The retard who popularized the term of "Gamer entitlement" quits IGN. [IMG]http://i.imgur.com/4yRIKI5.png[/IMG] [video=youtube;DqgRP5_YKu0]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DqgRP5_YKu0[/video]
[img]https://pbs.twimg.com/media/B6ka4GECEAAiZY_.png:large[/img] 'too weak for liveleak' Mr. ralph wiggims posted a video from an alleged hack of buttbutts which confirmed the chatlogs. [editline]5th January 2015[/editline] [QUOTE=Wii60;46862205]The spreader of "Gamer entitlement" quits IGN. [IMG]http://i.imgur.com/4yRIKI5.png[/IMG][/QUOTE] does include people in the 25 invisible signs you're in a cult?
[QUOTE=Wii60;46862205]The retard who popularized the term of "Gamer entitlement" quits IGN. [IMG]http://i.imgur.com/4yRIKI5.png[/IMG][/QUOTE] you know, it isnt until gamergate i started checking where everyone on twitter that works in the games industry (in some form) lives (or is located) based on their profiles. this is another san fran. i think there's something in the water there. edit: his fucking twitter handle is [b]no taxation[/b]. so revolutionary.
[QUOTE=TheJoey;46862238]you know, it isnt until gamergate i started checking where everyone on twitter that works in the games industry (in some form) lives (or is located) based on their profiles. this is another san fran. i think there's something in the water there.[/QUOTE] we need to nuke san fran to save the gaming industry its the only way [editline]5th January 2015[/editline] [URL]http://theralphretort.com/hacked-sick-sarah-nyberg-logs-proven-real-suck-srhbutts-lol/[/URL] [video=youtube;AfVBaQHSeo8]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AfVBaQHSeo8[/video] [editline]5th January 2015[/editline] all 110k chat entries that involve SRHButts on FFshrine.org [URL]https://mega.co.nz/#!D58UkKiI!4iiQXsHC4IHavjgHHNY9HiXm3t3ad0TgEYZVW7AdL-4[/URL] The YT vid (higher quality too!) above incase it goes down: [URL]http://a.pomf.se/uywpgz.webm[/URL] [editline]5th January 2015[/editline] [QUOTE][15:52] <Sarah> - Snuggling: laying down on the sofa, my little girl sitting between my legs, we're watching the tele or I'm reading to her, or perhaps she is playing Pok\xe9mon on her Gameboy. And she'll feel my hardness press up against her back, and ask "Daddy, what's that? umm.. that thing that keep touching my back?" [15:52] <ashin> sarah no =( [15:52] <Top-Cat> haha [15:52] * Ariandle (rapter26@firc-3CF95DEB.rt-bras.wnvl.centurytel.net) Quit (Quit: \x0f) [15:52] <Sarah> - Potty: My little girl has just gone potty, and now I can hear her calling to me from the washroom, "Daddy! Daddy! I'm finished!" And so I rush into clean-up mode, grabbing the box of 'Baby Wipes'. She's standing there, her hands on the basin of the toilet, her arse pushed out to me, her legs spread wide for me to clean her bottom. [15:52] <Sarah> potty ! [15:53] <My-Finger-Schmels-Old> glad jander isn't here [15:53] <Top-Cat> ew [15:53] <Top-Cat> ok [15:53] <Top-Cat> wrong now [15:55] <Sarah> - Examination: My daughter could have a itchy spot, or a pain somewhere on her body, and being her father I would have to examine the area to make certain it was nothing too serious. Good excuses to get me to examine her: Strangely Wet Underwear, 'First Menstruation', maybe a bruise on the leg which I would have to take my daughter's pants off to see, etc.[/QUOTE] [QUOTE] [20:30]19:43] <Sarah> Daddy," I whisper. [19:43] <Sarah> "What is it, baby?" Daddy says this all too loudly. We're in a restaurant! What if someone hears him? [19:43] <Sarah> "Umm…my-my-my girl-bits are wet" I blush and giggle at this, making sure to keep my voice down. Daddy just recently instated a new rule saying that I have to inform him when my girl-bits become wet, no matter where we are or what we're doing. [19:43] <Sarah> hotttttttttt [19:43] <Fudgepuppy> sounds like Milkman has never had a man-kiss [19:43] <Milkman> you would be correct [19:43] <Fudgepuppy> i am right :) [19:44] * Kisanarou (jamesltaka@firc-142D0243.client.comcast.net) Quit (Ping timeout\x0f) [19:44] <Sparkster> brb [19:44] <Sarah> "I'm a whoreeee, Daddy. Daddy…Daddy I'm a whore." [19:44] <Sarah> "That's right you are. What can Daddy do to you, bitch?" [19:44] <Sarah> "Ohhhh, Daddy…Daddy you can do anything t-t-to-to me, Daddy…you can use me Daddy…Daddy…I'm…I'm….Daddy I'm your whore…Daddyyy" [/QUOTE] [QUOTE][16:04] <Sarah> My wife and I are new to the K9 thing but are very aroused by it. We have both tried oral on our K9 but his Knott goes away after just a few minutes and loses his hard on. Is there anyway to help him keep it up? Also my wife wants to see me get taken anally by our K9. Is there any real difference between anal and vaginal K9 intercourse?[/QUOTE] what in the fuck
[QUOTE=Ithon;46862207][img]https://pbs.twimg.com/media/B6ka4GECEAAiZY_.png:large[/img] 'too weak for liveleak' Mr. ralph wiggims posted a video from an alleged hack of buttbutts which confirmed the chatlogs. [editline]5th January 2015[/editline] does include people in the 25 invisible signs you're in a cult?[/QUOTE] Wait, what? You can [I]be[/I] banned from Liveleak? I'm presuming this is based on a ToS violation or something, maybe they have a rule against posting chatlogs. I can't imagine that a site which allows videos of the most gruesome, violent murders would be swayed by people saying "THIS CHATLOG IS OFFENSIVE"
[QUOTE=Wii60;46862241]we need to nuke san fran to save the gaming industry its the only way [editline]5th January 2015[/editline] [URL]http://theralphretort.com/hacked-sick-sarah-nyberg-logs-proven-real-suck-srhbutts-lol/[/URL] [video=youtube;AfVBaQHSeo8]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AfVBaQHSeo8[/video] [editline]5th January 2015[/editline] all 110k chat entries that involve SRHButts on FFshrine.org [URL]https://mega.co.nz/#!D58UkKiI!4iiQXsHC4IHavjgHHNY9HiXm3t3ad0TgEYZVW7AdL-4[/URL] The YT vid (higher quality too!) above incase it goes down: [URL]http://a.pomf.se/uywpgz.webm[/URL] [editline]5th January 2015[/editline] what in the fuck[/QUOTE] That was legitimately hard to read.
Im glad my work laptop doesnt have any of the remote admin tools I use installed or I would be worried. I'm actually really surprised you can be banned from liveleak, used to go there to watch war videos and all the edgy /b/ stuff I like when it's 4am and I've lost control of my life.
So I just read that little extract from srhbutts in the post and I feel like vomiting. I am genuinely so disgusted right now. How can [I]anyone[/I] be supporting a person who says stuff like that? How can [I][B]anybody[/B][/I] who claims to want to stop abuse think that it's okay for somebody to commit bestiality and, from what I can see, plan or desire to commit sexual child abuse to their own child? Fucking [B][I]how[/I][/B]? [editline]5th January 2015[/editline] I hate the fact that some Gamergate people dox others. I actually despise it and I wish that those people would fuck off and never darken the hashtag again. But what can we do? Can we actually stop it?
On a less :vomit: note We have another rampaging misogynist supporter. [URL]https://twitter.com/TheMercedesXXX/status/552165575233769472[/URL]
I guess those two half-posts kind of go together because, to my knowledge, whenever somebody who uses the hashtag goes out-of-line, we call them out on it and basically ostracise them. We've even done that with big names like KoP. But no AGG person has ever been rejected unless they decide that maybe Gamergate aren't the spawn of fucking Satan. They could literally be a [I]bestiality-committing paedophile with apparent intent to abuse children[/I] and they're being defended. I'm disgusted.
[QUOTE=EmperorVagak;46857188][url]http://kazerad.tumblr.com/post/107147839003/in-fact-lets-just-make-this-a-game-i-call-it[/url] Kazerad challenges both Gamergate supporters and Gamergate opposers to convince him that you aren't evil.[/QUOTE] Kazerad says there's no replies from the opposers. Someone spread this to ghazi or somewhere like that so that silence can't be blamed on lack exposure?
[QUOTE=Talishmar;46862943]Kazerad says there's no replies from the opposers. Someone spread this to ghazi or somewhere like that so that silence can't be blamed on lack exposure?[/QUOTE] A Ghazian was commenting in the KiA thread and was basically saying that they couldn't be bothered. Essentially they don't give a shit. And I keep on forgetting that Kazerad was the one that blew Dobson's ever inflating ass out of the water a while back on DA.
[QUOTE=DuCT;46863020]A Ghazian was commenting in the KiA thread and was basically saying that they couldn't be bothered. Essentially they don't give a shit. And I keep on forgetting that Kazerad was the one that blew Dobson's ever inflating ass out of the water a while back on DA.[/QUOTE] I've actually seen Ghazi claim that since they're not actually a group and just hate Gamers (Or as they call them "Gators") them never donating to anything is ok and people harassing others that also hate Gamers are not their problem. Yet they hold us to a different standard and were not even a group. We just hate the corrupt industry and journalists. They literally accuse us of being the devil for things they're guilty of as well.
blacklist reminder that group boycotts are illegal and if a company or person does something to you due to it you are able to go legal on their ass. [URL]http://www.ftc.gov/tips-advice/competition-guidance/guide-antitrust-laws/dealings-competitors/group-boycotts[/URL] also incase you needed more evidence somehow that SRH is known to be a pedo [img]http://i.imgur.com/Fo1y8Jr.png[/img] [img]http://i.imgur.com/pjSQ0mS.png[/img]
Holy shit, as much as I hate srhbutts that person is a fucking loony who wrote that post. Do they not realise that transsexuals were one of the targeted groups of the Holocaust too? Not to mention that I'm a transsexual (although I don't like the word myself)- [I]pretty[/I] certain I don't like paedophilia.
[QUOTE=Jamsponge;46863287]Holy shit, as much as I hate srhbutts that person is a fucking loony who wrote that post. Do they not realise that transsexuals were one of the targeted groups of the Holocaust too? Not to mention that I'm a transsexual (although I don't like the word myself)- [I]pretty[/I] certain I don't like paedophilia.[/QUOTE] It's a post from 2006, I think the mindset from that person changed by now
[QUOTE=Te Great Skeeve;46861502][...] Vice recently: [URL]https://archive.today/ECKhZ[/URL] Seems like opinions are going to change at Vice after this one. [...][/QUOTE] That's been going on for a while, there's a somewhat serious feud between Vice and Gawker (mostly because some parts of Vice are actually really good journalism and point out the unethical things other sites do after doing own research).
Max Scoville is now hired by IGN [url]https://twitter.com/agentbizzle/status/552181448409485312[/url]
[QUOTE=Wii60;46863655]It's a post from 2006, I think the mindset from that person changed by now[/QUOTE] Good point. Still, literally and unironically encouraging the Final Solution? Low blow.
[QUOTE=Wii60;46863697]Max Scoville is now hired by IGN [url]https://twitter.com/agentbizzle/status/552181448409485312[/url][/QUOTE] maybe IGN is equal opportunity? Either way if he spews more shit he should be called out for it, he works for IGN therefore he should in part represent the company.
[QUOTE=Jamsponge;46863287]Holy shit, as much as I hate srhbutts that person is a fucking loony who wrote that post. Do they not realise that transsexuals were one of the targeted groups of the Holocaust too? Not to mention that I'm a transsexual (although I don't like the word myself)- [I]pretty[/I] certain I don't like paedophilia.[/QUOTE] I think there are two distinct issues with the [Fucking Transsexuals] post: 1. Metonymy. It's a nasty piece of rhetoric regularly used to (among benign applications) associate larger groups with the actions of a few. Though in this case it's probably at least in part accidental because the person who wrote that is evidently at least somewhat freaked out by the situation (which I would be too, but I pay close attention to targeting issues and not people). The default mode of the human brain seems to be to pattern-match a bit too much when in doubt, so it's important to make people aware of the issue when it happens. (This reminds me a bit of the #NotAllMen drama a while ago. Whatever that specific hashtag was about in the end, I think the complaint against overly broad language used by "feminists" is legitimate since that kind of thing [I]has[/I] a well documented history of inciting hatred. Though admittedly I don't know how effective it was. Looking at SJWs bouncing it back and forth now and taking it literally: Probably quite a bit. Twitters character limit is not excuse either, since it's perfectly possible to make an point accurately with a bit of effort.) 2. Wishing war crimes onto someone. That's too far no matter what. In any case, the first action when you read something like this should be to politely point out the issue (while packaging the complaint a bit more nicely than usual because this person here is definitely venting and won't be receptive to harsh criticism). If they seriously start defending it [I]then[/I] you can write them off as a crazy person. Otherwise it's likely they are probably "just" uninformed and slightly hateful, and may somewhat readily pay attention to it after being made aware of the issue. (There's a pretty long rant somewhere on my Senf-Tumblr because someone actually brought up "metonymy" to defend metonymy using metonymy... Not going to look it up right now though.) [editline]6th January 2015[/editline] [QUOTE=Wii60;46862241][...] The YT vid (higher quality too!) above incase it goes down: [URL]http://a.pomf.se/uywpgz.webm[/URL] [...][/QUOTE] An SQL injection... I thought those were dying out by now. That's really fitting with the horrendously outdated site itself :v:
Very subtle satire, possibly not even related. If playing certain video games makes one a misogynist, what does playing Bowser video games do? [url]http://www.clickhole.com/blogpost/ability-play-bowser-has-made-our-society-more-evil-1644[/url]
[QUOTE=Hypershadsy;46864260]Very subtle satire, possibly not even related. If playing certain video games makes one a misogynist, what does playing Bowser video games do? [url]http://www.clickhole.com/blogpost/ability-play-bowser-has-made-our-society-more-evil-1644[/url][/QUOTE] Click hole is owned by the onion
[vid]http://a.pomf.se/wxnnuw.mp4[/vid] i dont know what to say about this
[QUOTE=e_k_M;46864458][vid]http://a.pomf.se/wxnnuw.mp4[/vid] i dont know what to say about this[/QUOTE] Overt songs about Gamergate are cringy, whether they're for or against it. It's like writing a song saying "The Vietnam War is really really bad, don't support the Vietnam War!" No matter what point you're going to try and raise, if you're flinging about the name of it then it's clunky lyric-writing. [editline]5th January 2015[/editline] Plus, is it [I]really[/I] that hard to avoid Gamergate? There might be quite a few of us, but I'd hardly consider us a dominant force on the Internet. We're almost entirely gamers, and most of everybody else is quite vehemently against us. I really can't imagine that safe spaces are that hard to find unless you deliberately look for unsafe ones.
[QUOTE=TheJoey;46862238]you know, it isnt until gamergate i started checking where everyone on twitter that works in the games industry (in some form) lives (or is located) based on their profiles. this is another san fran. i think there's something in the water there. edit: his fucking twitter handle is [b]no taxation[/b]. so revolutionary.[/QUOTE] I think everybody who lived in San Fran wanted to get a job as an actual journalist for the newspaper and failed, and it became an accumulation of rejects who were just bad at their job and though gaming journalism was easier.
[QUOTE=Wii60;46864328]Click hole is owned by the onion[/QUOTE] I did say it was satire.
[QUOTE=e_k_M;46864458][vid]http://a.pomf.se/wxnnuw.mp4[/vid] i dont know what to say about this[/QUOTE] These people are pathetic, this is just so fucking pathetic I have no words. This person probably felt so smug.
Imagine singing karaoke about 4chan and gamergate and being entirely serious about it.
God, even from his face you can tell he's the kind of pompous prick who only pretends to care about social issues to look good and score brownie points. Probably never had to face actual troubles in his life. Just like the rest of anti-gg!
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.