[QUOTE=Performual;18515096]I think Kodak made a few DSLRs so many years back. Also, I think they collaborated w/ Nikon (and maybe other companies?) to make some of the first DSLRs which hat 1.5 mega pixel sensors and whatnot.
If I had given myself more time when buying my first DSLR, I would have considered getting a Pentax along with Nikon and Canon.[/QUOTE]
my old SLR was the Pentax ist*DL... damn thing chugs through 4 AA batteries in one or two sittings... compared to charging my D5000 once this month.
:suicide:
I use the Sony Alpha 200, Pretty decent camera for a pretty decent price. Quite ok for amateur work, which is what I am. A complete amateur. its good quality for a decent price.
Recommended if you're inexperienced with using SLRs.
OP if you are still unsure (you did say Nikon though), get whatever feels good on your hands. I prefer the weight of Nikon and the grip it has.
Canon is good at what they do, Nikon is good at what they do. It comes down to taste. You should try before you buy. A lot.
Both of those are pretty good entry level DSLRs. If I remember correctly the 1000d doesn't have spot metering. Both of the cameras don't have the autofocus motor in the body, which means that lenses without an autofocus motor will have to be manual focused (this is typically only an issue with older lenses). The D3000 has more points of autofocus than the 1000d (I think the D3000 has 11, the 1000d has 6 or 7). Both the D3000 and the 1000d handle higher isos decently. Image quality is pretty much the same. The 1000D has live view where as the D3000 doesn't. I personally find live view useless for DSLRs. Be sure to go out and get a feel for both of the cameras. Make sure you feel comfortable with how the camera feels and how the controls are laid out.
[QUOTE=TRA;18539292]Both of those are pretty good entry level DSLRs. If I remember correctly the 1000d doesn't have spot metering. Both of the cameras don't have the autofocus motor in the body, which means that lenses without an autofocus motor will have to be manual focused (this is typically only an issue with older lenses). The D3000 has more points of autofocus than the 1000d (I think the D3000 has 11, the 1000d has 6 or 7). Both the D3000 and the 1000d handle higher isos decently. Image quality is pretty much the same. The 1000D has live view where as the D3000 doesn't. I personally find live view useless for DSLRs. Be sure to go out and get a feel for both of the cameras. Make sure you feel comfortable with how the camera feels and how the controls are laid out.[/QUOTE]
I think Pentax and Sony DSLRs have in-body focus motors. Also, I believe that Pentax's DSLR's have in-body image stabilization as well. The image stabilization system for Nikon and Canon is within their lenses.
Please correct me if I'm wrong.
[QUOTE=TRA;18539292]Both of the cameras don't have the autofocus motor in the body[/QUOTE]
The Canon does. Nikon's entry-level DSLRs don't.
This was the biggest reason for me going Canon.
lmfao at the OP saying the Canon 1000D not taking good photos. it's great.
Check this guy out.
[url]http://www.flickr.com/photos/_kane/[/url]
[QUOTE=The golden;18540322][highlight] All cameras from all companies take good pictures, it just comes down to lens selection and preferred perks.[/highlight][/QUOTE]
I agree.
Its mostly in the lenses.
The only advantage I ever really see is if you are doing action photography and need a faster shutter speed and higher ISO or something.
But for landscape and portrait and camera with the right lens can pull it off.
[QUOTE=jetlitheone;18540383]I agree.
Its mostly in the lenses.
The only advantage I ever really see is if you are doing action photography and need a faster shutter speed and higher ISO or something.
But for landscape and portrait and camera with the right lens can pull it off.[/QUOTE]
Pretty much any modern SLR will be able to get a high enough ISO or shutter speed for anything. It all comes down the extra features in the body (internal autofocus motor, etc.). Everything else is with the peripherals.
yeah and if the photo doesn't come out as good as you wanted.
Photoshop.
[QUOTE=jetlitheone;18540877]yeah and if the photo doesn't come out as good as you wanted.
Photoshop.[/QUOTE]
Photoshop isn't the end-all solution to a bad picture.
[QUOTE=The golden;18540322][highlight] All cameras from all companies take good pictures, it just comes down to lens selection and preferred perks.[/highlight][/QUOTE]
Yep. It's more the photographer than the camera.
And since amateur lens selection sucks on Nikons, go with Canon. Your wallet will thank you.
[QUOTE=DOG-GY;18541395]Photoshop isn't the end-all solution to a bad picture.[/QUOTE]
I know that.
It doesn't fix composition [usually]
or the point that its a bad subject.
But if its under or overexposed it can work wonders.
Also with colors and such.
I think I'm going to get a Nikon after christmas.
Thanks.
I am looking to buy a DSLR as well. I used to have a Nikon D40, but sold it. I'm pretty experienced with the whole DSLR thing. Just don't really know canons too well. What would be the canon equivalent of the D90/D5000?
[QUOTE=M23;18606487]I am looking to buy a DSLR as well. I used to have a Nikon D40, but sold it. I'm pretty experienced with the whole DSLR thing. Just don't really know canons too well. What would be the canon equivalent of the D90/D5000?[/QUOTE]
500D is the D5000 equivalent
[QUOTE=The golden;18607514]If you're a Nikon man, you should stick with Nikon. Just makes the learning curve easier for you.[/QUOTE]
How about whatever he finds more comfortable?
[QUOTE=Performual;18609305]How about whatever he finds more comfortable?[/QUOTE]
Still an odd adjustment if you're used to a moderately 'current' camera. I made the jump from my old pentax to my nikon d5000 with little trouble, but every time I try toying with a canon of one sort or another I fumble with the controls like I haven't seen a DSLR before. :raise:
I guess the differences between Nikon and Canon are enough to keep wary of making such a switch, but I say look into both options anyways, you may find comfort in one system over another.
I have a Nikon D60 which i'm pretty pleased with, although i'm looking at moving up to a D90 soon.
I see a 500D Kit on Dell's site for 575USD after BCB and I was disappointed that paid 580USD for my 450D Kit near the start of this year.
I carry my Powershot S5 IS for video, wouldn't mind carrying less gear and able to record HD :\
Though now I'm eying the SX1 IS for video.
[QUOTE=jlbmw2002;18655837]I see a 500D Kit on Dell's site for 575USD after BCB and I was disappointed that paid 580USD for my 450D Kit near the start of this year.
I carry my Powershot S5 IS for video, wouldn't mind carrying less gear and able to record HD :\
Though now I'm eying the SX1 IS for video.[/QUOTE]
I find it hard to believe that they'd sell a 500D Kit for that cheap. Are you sure it wasn't body only?
[QUOTE=Performual;18656347]I find it hard to believe that they'd sell a 500D Kit for that cheap. Are you sure it wasn't body only?[/QUOTE]
Bing Cashback is 20% at Dell.
Canon EOS Rebel T1i EF-S IS Digital SLR Camera Kit (with 18-55 mm Lens) - MSRP: $899.99
Instant Savings $80.00
Subtotal $719.00
[url]http://accessories.us.dell.com/sna/products/Digital_SLR/productdetail.aspx?c=us&l=en&s=dhs&cs=19&sku=A2575867[/url]
Then you use BCB for 20% off for a final price of 575.20USD and I believe free shipping.
But this is Out of Stock.
[QUOTE=LeYang;18656373]Bing Cashback is 20% at Dell.
Canon EOS Rebel T1i EF-S IS Digital SLR Camera Kit (with 18-55 mm Lens) - MSRP: $899.99
Instant Savings $80.00
Subtotal $719.00
[url]http://accessories.us.dell.com/sna/products/Digital_SLR/productdetail.aspx?c=us&l=en&s=dhs&cs=19&sku=A2575867[/url]
Then you use BCB for 20% off for a final price of 575.20USD and I believe free shipping.
But this is Out of Stock.[/QUOTE]
Oh I see how that works. Yea, I got mine with an instant savings of $100.
When I get a job im gonna upgrade to a 7D. which I hope is amazing...
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
