Give me five reasons why Valve isn't just as bad as Activision - General

I thought I'd seen my fair bunch of bad trolls but you sir take the prize. Jesus christ, you're not even trying.

[QUOTE=Fatfatfatty;24287835]We gave you more than 5 reasons and you resort to flaming? obvious 12-year old troll is obvious[/QUOTE] Wasn't his name enough to know that? I mean, seriously.

snip

They don't milk their games and ruin them with pointless sequels. They created Steam which practically began non-retail gaming. They allow for easy modding. They are interested in what's important. Fun, interesting games, not money. Many of their games have been important benchmarks.

why is this guy trolling people who responded properly to his question? GTFO SoGlad666

[QUOTE=SoGlad666;24287820]Have fun shoveling literal shit into your mouths for the rest of your pathetic Valve lives.[/QUOTE] [img]http://i758.photobucket.com/albums/xx228/dymediggler/Animated/gonbgud.gif[/img]

Because Activision published COD:MW2.

If you don't like Valve then something is wrong with you

[QUOTE=SoGlad666;24287911]It's actually as if every single poster in this thread (besides me and "Carpbasket") don't have blinders on our heads. [/QUOTE] Craptaket is a homophobe.

I think the only way to say why valve aren't as bad as activision is saying at maximum 5 things about activision themselves. Things wrong with activision: 1) They charge $15 for lazy, sloppy DLC 2) They publish the same TACTICOOL SHOOTER games over and over 3) They leech money off of Blizzard 4) They literally said, in their own words, their business plan was to "exploit franchises" 5) They only care about the console market 6) Their CEO is a soulless monster who eats babies. Oops, that was one too many.

[QUOTE=sparky28000;24287922]Because Activision published COD:MW2.[/QUOTE] We have a winner.

OP stop posting, because you should know when you've lost

[QUOTE=CrumbleShake;24287916]They don't milk their games and ruin them with pointless sequels. They created Steam which practically began non-retail gaming. They allow for easy modding. They are interested in what's important. Fun, interesting games, not money. Many of their games have been important benchmarks.[/QUOTE] Benchmarks? really? pointless sequels? Half-Life (Opposing Force · Blue Shift · Decay) Half-Life 2 (Episode One · Episode Two) seems pointless to me

[QUOTE=SoGlad666;24287820]Have fun shoveling literal shit into your mouths for the rest of your pathetic Valve lives.[/QUOTE] Why don't you comment on the reasons given? Now you're just like 'well, you are right but you guys are still fags'

[QUOTE=Fatfatfatty;24287926]Craptaket is a homophobe.[/QUOTE] damn straight

[img]http://images.g4tv.com/ImageDb3/168032_S/Activision-CEO-Bobby-Kotick-is-the-devil.jpg[/img] [img]http://www.theinquirer.net/img/4348/gabe_newell1_gdc_2007.jpg?1241332033[/img] Because pictures say a thousand words.

I honestly do commend OP for succesfully trolling.

For fucks sake. It's a troll.. stop replying to it.

[QUOTE=SoGlad666;24287946]Benchmarks? really? pointless sequels? Half-Life (Opposing Force · Blue Shift · Decay) Half-Life 2 (Episode One · Episode Two) seems pointless to me[/QUOTE] Opposing Force and Blue Shift weren't made by Valve :downs: (and before you overturn that on me look at CoD 3, WaW and Black Ops)

[QUOTE=Ray-The-Sun;24287928]I think the only way to say why valve aren't as bad as activision is saying at maximum 5 things about activision themselves. Things wrong with activision: 1) They charge $15 for lazy, sloppy DLC 2) They publish the same TACTICOOL SHOOTER games over and over 3) They leech money off of Blizzard 4) They literally said, in their own words, their business plan was to "exploit franchises" 5) They only care about the console market 6) Their CEO is a soulless monster who eats babies. Oops, that was one too many.[/QUOTE] Leech money off Blizzard yeah right

Although what amazes me more is the amount of people successfully getting trolled by this guy.

[QUOTE=i_speel_good;24287966]Opposing Force and Blue Shift weren't made by Valve :downs: (and before you overturn that on me look at CoD 3, WaW and Black Ops)[/QUOTE] so if the second harry potter movie was directed by a different person than the first harry potter movie it wouldnt be in the same canonical unvierse? is that really what you are trying to prove? take a seat

To be honest half of the people who are trying to defend their opinion here are doing badly. saying "LOL ENJOY UR BOXES OP" won't get you anywhere. also ITT opinions

:golfclap:

[QUOTE=SoGlad666;24287996]so if the second harry potter movie was directed by a different person than the first harry potter movie it wouldnt be in the same [b]canonical[/b] unvierse? is that really what you are trying to prove? take a seat[/QUOTE] Trying to sound smart?

[QUOTE=SoGlad666;24287996]so if the second harry potter movie was directed by a different person than the first harry potter movie it wouldnt be in the same canonical unvierse? is that really what you are trying to prove? take a seat[/QUOTE] I'm not talking about the canonical universe but that they weren't made by the same company :downs:

[QUOTE=SoGlad666;24287996]so if the second harry potter movie was directed by a different person than the first harry potter movie it wouldnt be in the same canonical unvierse? is that really what you are trying to prove? take a seat[/QUOTE] You were discussing why [B]VALVE[/B] was as bad as activision, not why Half-Life was worse than CoD. You are derailing your own thread.

Counter Strike is a benchmark isn't it?

[QUOTE=SoGlad666;24287996]so if the second harry potter movie was directed by a different person than the first harry potter movie it wouldnt be in the same canonical unvierse? is that really what you are trying to prove? take a seat[/QUOTE] I thought this was about the COMPANY's, not the game universes. But let's bring harry potter which has total relevence into this :downs:

[QUOTE=SoGlad666;24287996]so if the second harry potter movie was directed by a different person than the first harry potter movie it wouldnt be in the same canonical unvierse? is that really what you are trying to prove? take a seat[/QUOTE] what the fuck are you talking about