Call of Duty Black Ops 2: Behind the Scenes Preview - General

Just watched the video and wow, I don't know why you guys are bitching. This doesn't feel like a call of duty it feels like something feels. I'm honestly looking forward to the sandbox gamemodes, zombies and the campaign. It looks sweet

[QUOTE=fruxodaily;36216163]So valve uses the source engine for most of their games and upgrades it during releases which include little advancements and you guys get happy over that, but when someone like treyach does that ohh no, let's all hate on them god fucking damnit facepunch[/QUOTE] who said anything about valve and the source engine? I didn't. I didn't even include any words that can be boggled into "valve" or "source engine". I was thinking more along the lines of Crysis. Crytek was developing for Far Cry, right? Then comes along Crysis. I'm just saying, they can do more than add little snidbits to put the 'extra' effort in. The only effort they're putting in is too make sure they use the same old rusty engine, with poor colour, poor graphics, and poor utilization.

[QUOTE=SatansSin;36221020]who said anything about valve and the source engine? I didn't. I didn't even include any words that can be boggled into "valve" or "source engine". I was thinking more along the lines of Crysis. Crytek was developing for Far Cry, right? Then comes along Crysis. I'm just saying, they can do more than add little snidbits to put the 'extra' effort in. The only effort they're putting in is too make sure they use the same old rusty engine, with poor colour, poor graphics, and poor utilization.[/QUOTE] No it's just the general fact that we all know valve has used the same engine since 2004 and continues to update it here and there just like treyach and the COD4 engine (IW 3.0). The E3 gameplay made it look shit thanks to probably how it was projected but honestly the trailers and other things are most likely XBOX footage, PC black ops looks pretty decent on full settings.

[QUOTE=SatansSin;36221020]who said anything about valve and the source engine? I didn't. I didn't even include any words that can be boggled into "valve" or "source engine". I was thinking more along the lines of Crysis. Crytek was developing for Far Cry, right? Then comes along Crysis. I'm just saying, they can do more than add little snidbits to put the 'extra' effort in. The only effort they're putting in is too make sure they use the same old rusty engine, with poor colour, poor graphics, and poor utilization.[/QUOTE] The engine is working fine, and if you only have two years to develop a game it would be wasteful to spend well needed time to develop a new engine. Yes, this is a problem, but can be blamed on Activision, not the developers. Alongside that, their core target audience are consoles, and are developing their game for them. Although I am a PC player and would like if everything was optimized for PC, it wouldn't be smart to make a ton of exclusive features for the minority platform. That being said, I'm still skeptical about this game but am hoping it turns out great (who wouldn't?).

I DONT WANT TO HEAR "PUSHING THE BOUNDARIES" EVER AGAIN WE GET THAT YOUR SCRIPTED-EVENT PALOOZA EATS UP ALL THE DISK MEMORY THATS NOT PUSHING THATS WASTING Still looks good though, I like the scripted events they are pretty.