I had no idea Tintin had such a following, the only real things of it I ever saw were a few of the comics they had at the library when I was a kid and that meme pic:
[img]http://cache.ohinternet.com/images/9/9e/HA_HA_HA,_OH_WOW.jpg[/img]
Very popular in Europe, which is probably why we get it 2 months before the US.
I remember the animated Tintins were on tv alot when I was a kid, my school had the comics in the library but they were all in french.
Why did he call the dog Snowy and why is does he have a british accent?
[QUOTE=Carne;32843951]The budget is apparently around $130 millions.[/QUOTE]
and yet this trailer was done on an un-licensed copy of final cut pro
i remember this show! i wasnt aware they made a movie of it
[QUOTE=Mr Shadyface;32842420]Man, I grew up on Tintin, this is gonna be sweet.
Also, leaked footage:
[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jwyPOGcAgVk&feature=related[/media]
(Just kidding)[/QUOTE]
[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y7iahm0iPm0&feature=related[/media]
yay! I read the comic and watched the tv show
My dad gave me all the original comics. Can't wait.
[QUOTE=Carne;32841134]
As a fan of the comics I'm really looking forward to this, and it's getting very positive early reviews as well.[/QUOTE]
Well the average score for it on RT right now is a 6.5/10 but yeah still not negative and too early to really take anything from that.
Love the voice cast so hope it turns out awesome.
i never watched the show, i just read the books
the books were great. they had a old timey racism to them sometimes
[QUOTE=postal;32855192]Well the average score for it on RT right now is a 6.5/10 but yeah still not negative and too early to really take anything from that.
Love the voice cast so hope it turns out awesome.[/QUOTE]
Ye, but for some reason RT counts 3/5 as rotten. Though there's a load of other positive reviews not added to RT.
Its funny that Steven Spielberg will first release this movie in Europe because it is kinda 100% sure more people over here know Kuifje/Tintin instead in the US.
Can't wait for this movie, also heartwarming to know that Steven Spielberg reads Tintin alot
[editline]19th October 2011[/editline]
I think this will also have an effect on the review scores
[editline]19th October 2011[/editline]
[video=youtube;9KDtiyr4Elw]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9KDtiyr4Elw[/video]
duizend bommen en granaten!
[QUOTE=Carne;32858128]Ye, but for some reason RT counts 3/5 as rotten. Though there's a load of other positive reviews not added to RT.[/QUOTE]That 6.5 average rating isn't the one based on rotten/fresh, it's the one that's actually based on the scores each review gave.
[editline]19th October 2011[/editline]
Not trying to rain on your parade, though. still too soon to take anything from it of course
I don't know... Haddock looks like he's going to be kinda annoying.
The visuals of the environment look very realistic.
Funny funfact:
Every single frame costed 5 hours to render, it took so long that in the time the process began Steven Spielberg just made a whole movie "To fill the time between it" :v:
So he made War Horse inbetween Tintin?
Hold on, let me grab that interview again
[QUOTE=Zakkin;32847978]Simon pegg + Nick frost is in it aswell.[/QUOTE]
whenever that duo is in a movie, there is bound to be laughter
[IMG]http://www.uploadplaatjes.nl/plaatjes/6/221372.jpg[/IMG]
"That is true, Tintin is for the largest part an computer animated movie and it costs 5 hours to render each frame
I'm not going to wait that long to finish it, i just cannot wait on that kind of stuff so instead i thought why not make a movie between it."
[QUOTE=darth-veger;32863542]Funny funfact:
Every single frame costed 5 hours to render, it took so long that in the time the process began Steven Spielberg just made a whole movie "To fill the time between it" :v:[/QUOTE]
Let's see: 5 hours a frame; 48 frames per second (24 frames per eye for 3D); ~6420 seconds for footage (according to Wikipedia). That comes to roughly ~1,540,800 hours of rendering.
Oh Lord :v:
[QUOTE=Wiggles;32864241]Let's see: 5 hours a frame; 48 frames per second (24 frames per eye for 3D); ~6420 seconds for footage (according to Wikipedia). That comes to roughly ~1,540,800 hours of rendering.[/QUOTE]
Tell me if i'm wrong but 1,540,800 hours would come down to 175 years, don't think that's right or do you? I used this site to calculate: [url]http://www.onlineconversion.com/time.htm[/url]
[QUOTE=Xehanort;32880800]Tell me if i'm wrong but 1,540,800 hours would come down to 175 years, don't think that's right or do you? I used this site to calculate: [url]http://www.onlineconversion.com/time.htm[/url][/QUOTE]
They probably don't render all of it in one place.
Grew up reading Tintin and Asterix & Obelix.
So happy they made a movie out of Tintin. Captain Haddock's one liners made me laugh so much.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.