[QUOTE=trotskygrad;38639582][IMG]http://i.imgur.com/aDgQDl.jpg[/IMG]
magical knife > guns[/QUOTE]
"what kind of steel is the blade, trotsky?"
"pakistan"
[editline]29th November 2012[/editline]
[QUOTE=ewitwins;38635129][url]http://www.armslist.com/posts/679152/phoenix-arizona-handguns-for-sale--cz52-9mm-with-ammo-holster-2-mags[/url]
[h2]GODDAMNIT WHY DO THESE ALWAYS POP UP WHEN I'M BROKE[/h2][/QUOTE]
prolly gonna buy this now, thanks m8
[editline]29th November 2012[/editline]
[QUOTE=DaCommie1;38637152]The 2 triggers are linked, pulling one fires both barrels. When it first showed up, people were worried that it would classify as a machine gun because it shoots 2 shots for 1 pull of the trigger.[/QUOTE]
what i meant was, how does the ATF not consider that a machine gun?
[QUOTE=Mr. Foster;38640724]No one has provided any accurate information to your questions, so I am going to answer them. I know more about optics than I do guns, and that is saying something. Taller scope rings serve two purposes; clearance and comfort. Taller scope rings are for larger objective scopes, and taller open scope rings are for you to be able to use iron sights if your gun has them. Assuming you are using a 40mm or smaller objective, the only purpose taller scope rings would serve is for shooter comfort. Basically, if you find it uncomfortable to look down into your scope on lower rings, you can use taller rings to alleviate this somewhat. This is strictly user preference, and you need to decide it for yourself.
Height does NOT effect accuracy. The ANGLE at which the scope is at is what effects accuracy, and I will be explaining this below. As for you, a .22LR is not capable of reaching distances where you would need to worry about scope angle or adjustments. Basically, get what ever height feels the most comfortable to you. Scope is personal preference as well. Personally, anything past a 4x is excessive for a .22LR, and a larger scope is just extra un-needed weight. A good 4x fixed power scope is the most a .22LR will EVER need. Again though, this is just my personal preference.
It's not height that effects the zero, it's the angle. Whether the scope is 1mm away from the barrel or 2" away from the barrel, as long as the scope and barrel are parallel your zero will not be effected. If your scope is NOT parallel to your barrel, regardless of the height, your zero will be effected. Here is why...
Modern scopes that are parallel to the bore have a 0 MOA mount, and they typically have difficulty achieving zero at distances past 600 yards. This happens because you have to angle the barrel up in order for the bullet arc to reach your desired distance. When you angle the barrel up, the front of your scope goes up meaning your adjustment has to be brought down. Scope adjustments can only be brought down so far before you bottom out, and this is where plus size MOA scope mounts come in to play. The larger the MOA of the mount, the closer the FRONT of the scope will be brought down to the barrel. When you bring the front of the scope closer to the barrel, you free up adjustments on your scope, allowing you to achieve longer distance zeros. Increasing the MOA on your mount has a negative effect on close range zeros, typically under 100 yards and being more prevalent under 50 yards. For close range zeros, the barrel will be pointing downward, meaning the scope adjustments have to go up. If the front of your scope is at a downward angle as well, this limits the amount of adjustments you scope can make going up, creating the problem. It's basically the polar opposite of a 0 MOA mount that can not achieve a long range zero.
A little note for shooters: Any modern scope mounted to a standard 0 MOA mounting system will have enough adjustments for shots at 0-500 yards, regardless of caliber.[/QUOTE]
Thank you. I knew [i]some[/i] about scope rings but you're much more helpful than I was.
[editline]29th November 2012[/editline]
[QUOTE=Neat!;38646205]"what kind of steel is the blade, trotsky?"
"pakistan"
[editline]29th November 2012[/editline]
prolly gonna buy this now, thanks m8
[editline]29th November 2012[/editline]
what i meant was, how does the ATF not consider that a machine gun?[/QUOTE]
They did, however, they reconsidered it or maybe the Manufacturer changed it to one trigger per barrel.
[QUOTE=Neat!;38646205]"what kind of steel is the blade, trotsky?"
"pakistan"
[editline]29th November 2012[/editline]
prolly gonna buy this now, thanks m8
[editline]29th November 2012[/editline]
what i meant was, how does the ATF not consider that a machine gun?[/QUOTE]
So help me if you buy that before I do I will find you, NEAT!
[b][h2]I WILL FIND YOU![/h2][/b]
i pooped on my guitar and this happened
[media]http://soundcloud.com/neat-3/the-keel[/media]
[QUOTE=Ridge;38644628]
.30-06 is in Mosin Nagant[/QUOTE]
Except the US did rechamber a lot of the M91s we made after the Russians didn't pay for them
[QUOTE=Neat!;38646892]i pooped on my guitar and this happened
[media]http://soundcloud.com/neat-3/the-keel[/media][/QUOTE]
And this means what?
[QUOTE=cpt.armadillo;38646985]And this means what?[/QUOTE]
i posted my music here before, and you guys liked it. so i continue, out into the wild green yonder
[QUOTE=felix the cat;38646917]Except the US did rechamber a lot of the M91s we made after the Russians didn't pay for them[/QUOTE]
30-06 Mosin would be the COOLEST thing EVER
[sp]besides a .22 LR mosin[/sp]
[QUOTE=Neat!;38646996]i posted my music here before, and you guys liked it. so i continue, out into the wild green yonder[/QUOTE]
In firearms thread?
[QUOTE=cpt.armadillo;38646985]And this means what?[/QUOTE]
WAR!!!!!
[QUOTE=/Vandy/;38647017]30-06 Mosin would be the COOLEST thing EVER
[sp]besides a .22 LR mosin[/sp][/QUOTE]
yeah, rechamber it in a round that costs 5x as much, that sounds awesome.
[QUOTE=felix the cat;38646917]Except the US did rechamber a lot of the M91s we made after the Russians didn't pay for them[/QUOTE]
Really? Never heard of this.
They go for a pretty penny I'd imagine?
[QUOTE=massn7;38647796]Really? Never heard of this.
They go for a pretty penny I'd imagine?[/QUOTE]
Approximately $1200 last I checked
[QUOTE=Mr. Foster;38640724]No one has provided any accurate information to your questions, so I am going to answer them. I know more about optics than I do guns, and that is saying something. Taller scope rings serve two purposes; clearance and comfort. Taller scope rings are for larger objective scopes, and taller open scope rings are for you to be able to use iron sights if your gun has them. Assuming you are using a 40mm or smaller objective, the only purpose taller scope rings would serve is for shooter comfort. Basically, if you find it uncomfortable to look down into your scope on lower rings, you can use taller rings to alleviate this somewhat. This is strictly user preference, and you need to decide it for yourself.
Height does NOT effect accuracy. The ANGLE at which the scope is at is what effects accuracy, and I will be explaining this below. As for you, a .22LR is not capable of reaching distances where you would need to worry about scope angle or adjustments. Basically, get what ever height feels the most comfortable to you. Scope is personal preference as well. Personally, anything past a 4x is excessive for a .22LR, and a larger scope is just extra un-needed weight. A good 4x fixed power scope is the most a .22LR will EVER need. Again though, this is just my personal preference.
It's not height that effects the zero, it's the angle. Whether the scope is 1mm away from the barrel or 2" away from the barrel, as long as the scope and barrel are parallel your zero will not be effected. If your scope is NOT parallel to your barrel, regardless of the height, your zero will be effected. Here is why...[/QUOTE]
Thank you for your insight! I called them up today and they'll ship all my parts and a set of high rings(free)! They said they'd give me the mediums when they come in eventually. They're really nice guys, 15 minutes on the phone and my junk gets shipped tomorrow!
Thanks again
[QUOTE=/Vandy/;38647017].22 LR mosin[/QUOTE]
I'd totally buy a little .22lr rifle built around a downscaled Mosin action.
An interesting thread [url=http://www.calguns.net/calgunforum/showthread.php?t=596988]regarding the mini-Mosin Nagant[/url]
Apparently 3/4 scale mini-mosin that fired an 3.81x27R round.
[url]http://miniaturearsenal.com/about[/url]
[b]THIS IS THE COOLEST OF THINGS[/b]
[QUOTE=ewitwins;38652794][URL]http://miniaturearsenal.com/about[/URL]
[B]THIS IS THE COOLEST OF THINGS[/B][/QUOTE]
Holy shit, thank you so much for this link. A mini VSS? Heck yes!
[editline]30th November 2012[/editline]
In perfect time for Christmas too!
[editline]30th November 2012[/editline]
Ha, nvm. Pretty sure these things cost like, tens of thousands of dollars. What a shame :c
[QUOTE=fishyfish777;38654739][img]http://imgkk.com/i/0vr6.jpg[/img]
happy holidays firearms thread[/QUOTE]
Kill Fritz in style with this years new line of Soviet winter jackets!
[QUOTE=fishyfish777;38654739][img]http://imgkk.com/i/0vr6.jpg[/img]
happy holidays firearms thread[/QUOTE]
Who doesn't love a good nuclear holocaust?
[video=youtube;t039p6xqutU]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t039p6xqutU[/video]
I wonder if I could make a Pantograph to make tiny functional copies of some of my guns. Be small enough to use a dremel with some carbide bits.
4mm Gewehr 98 or .29 Remington 1863. :v:
Bought 380 rounds of 7.92x57 for 75bux off of gunboards.
Can't wait to have my first spam can opening experience.
[QUOTE=MisDiagnosed;38656314]Bought 380 rounds of 7.92x57 for 75bux off of gunboards.
Can't wait to have my first spam can opening experience.[/QUOTE]
Sounds a lot more useful than 7.92x57 .380 rounds :v:
[I]I'M READY FOR JERRY[/I]
[t]http://filesmelt.com/dl/photo290.JPG[/t]
Went to shoot my new M44 today, was surprised at how big the muzzle flash was, friend decided to try and take a photo.
[img]http://i.imgur.com/JJo4I.jpg?1[/img]
The shit quality of my phone camera almost makes it look ~artsy
I'd say post it on DeviantArt and have all the rabid idiots complementing your amazing composition and shit, but because it's a gun all the pussies on there would probably piss themselves.
Shooting with the bayonet out?
[QUOTE=ewitwins;38652794][url]http://miniaturearsenal.com/about[/url]
[b]THIS IS THE COOLEST OF THINGS[/b][/QUOTE]
I remember a few years ago when I was in Beijing you could buy miniature replicas of guns in this store for around 20 euro a gun, one of my friends got me one as a going home gift. These ones are so superb and exclusive they are throwing around words like royal and exclusive, they look incredible.
You know what makes no sense? Because those are all "replica firearms" they're all banned in Canada. For no good fucking reason. They banned fucking replica firearms.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
