• Firearms VII- Obrez's at Dawn
    10,020 replies, posted
The Czech Republic is chill as shit about guns I just learned this We should hang out more often
As part of the (enormous) legal process to buy a gun they sent me out to "certify my residence certificate". wat
[QUOTE=jimhowl33t;38148260]Fake grenades that act as shells, firing a bunch of pellets in a shotgun-like manner. [img]http://www.shortyusa.com/cart/images/1429.jpg[/img] Apparently each "grenade" costs about 60-70 dollars, oh fuck.[/QUOTE] Instead of filling them with BBs, I just use the gas pressure inside the grenade to fire those pocket nerf footballs, and we count them as AoE weapons, so it acts more like a real 40mm grenade instead of just a big shotgun but yeah the shells are quite expensive, but basically infintely reusable [quote] is that a fucking m79 Edited: how the hell do you make an airsoft m79 [/quote] Its really fucking pretty, my current one has walnut furniture [IMG]http://i60.photobucket.com/albums/h4/timebmb757/P1020607.jpg[/IMG] You think thats bad? I had an MGL as well a few years ago :v: [IMG]http://i60.photobucket.com/albums/h4/timebmb757/P1010194.jpg[/IMG]
[QUOTE=Timebomb575;38149267] You think thats bad? I had an MGL as well a few years ago :v: [IMG]http://i60.photobucket.com/albums/h4/timebmb757/P1010194.jpg[/IMG][/QUOTE] Is it just me, or is that just as cumbersome as a sack of potatoes and a dead hooker?
i need a new place to store my ammo, i think buddha might be a bit miffed [t]http://i.imgur.com/bgUHA.jpg[/t]
[QUOTE=Campin Carl;38150801]Is it just me, or is that just as cumbersome as a sack of potatoes and a dead hooker?[/QUOTE] I don't know, I've never had to haul a sack of potatoes.
[QUOTE=Neat!;38151552]i need a new place to store my ammo, i think buddha might be a bit miffed [t]http://i.imgur.com/bgUHA.jpg[/t][/QUOTE] this image is leaking irony all over my computer desk
[QUOTE=Campin Carl;38150801]Is it just me, or is that just as cumbersome as a sack of potatoes and a dead hooker?[/QUOTE] Yeah, it weighed about 6kgs loaded and had no sling mount :v:
[QUOTE=Raijin;38151763]this image is leaking irony all over my computer desk[/QUOTE] "If someone has a gun and is trying to kill you, it would be reasonable to shoot back with your own gun." - Dalai Lama [editline]23rd October 2012[/editline] well, one of them. The OG, Ghandi
[QUOTE=Neat!;38151938]"If someone has a gun and is trying to kill you, it would be reasonable to shoot back with your own gun." - Dalai Lama [editline]23rd October 2012[/editline] well, one of them. The OG, Ghandi[/QUOTE] "Fucking kill everyone who isn't Buddhist" -Japan during the Feudal era.
japan was nitro insane before we bombed them into submission [editline]23rd October 2012[/editline] if it weren't for the atom we wouldn't have the humble little country we have today and that means no anime
[QUOTE=Neat!;38152088]japan was nitro insane before we bombed them into submission [editline]23rd October 2012[/editline] if it weren't for the atom we wouldn't have the humble little country we have today and that means no anime[/QUOTE] Actually Japan would be Russian if it weren't for the H-Bomb. Russia had taken Manchuria and was already taking islands from Japan.
that would be quite silly
[QUOTE=Broguts;38152123]Actually Japan would be Russian if it weren't for the H-Bomb. Russia had taken Manchuria and was already taking islands from Japan.[/QUOTE] "B-but comrade-kun, the Kalashnikov isn't supposed to go in there..."
[QUOTE=DaCommie1;38152821]"B-but comrade-kun, the Kalashnikov isn't supposed to go in there..."[/QUOTE] SHUT UP SHLYUKHA! OOOOOOOOOOORAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH!
[QUOTE=Broguts;38152123]Actually Japan would be Russian if it weren't for the H-Bomb. Russia had taken Manchuria and was already taking islands from Japan.[/QUOTE] If the soviets invaded with infantry the death toll would have been in the millions on both sides. Just think Talvisota, except 10 times worse. I doubt they would have invaded the mainland without glassing it first.
[QUOTE=Trunk Monkay;38152915]If the soviets invaded with infantry the death toll would have been in the millions on both sides. Just think Talvisota, except 10 times worse. I doubt they would have invaded the mainland without glassing it first.[/QUOTE] Well this time around the soviets actually had modern equipment and competent commanders.
[QUOTE=Broguts;38152939]Well this time around the soviets actually had modern equipment and competent commanders.[/QUOTE] They'd still be facing an island invasion where the entire population is going to resist until the last man, woman, and child would have been killed. The US had death toll estimates for operation downfall, they thought they might suffer 456,000-1,260,000 casualties during the operation. The soviets probably would have suffered similar losses.
[QUOTE=Trunk Monkay;38152984]They'd still be facing an island invasion where the entire population is going to resist until the last man, woman, and child would have been killed. The US had death toll estimates for operation downfall, they thought they might suffer 456,000-1,260,000 casualties during the operation. The soviets probably would have suffered similar losses.[/QUOTE] 1,260,000 Is still just over half of the battle of Stalingrad, which is considered a "win"
[QUOTE=Broguts;38152123]Actually Japan would be Russian if it weren't for the H-Bomb. Russia had taken Manchuria and was already taking islands from Japan.[/QUOTE] I think that if Japan had not attacked the US in the second world war, then Russia would be Japanese. Because the Japanese pretty much owned China and could easily beat Russian troops in skill, but with China they could beat them with numbers too.
[QUOTE=Skullivan21;38153826]I think that if Japan had not attacked the US in the second world war, then Russia would be Japanese. Because the Japanese pretty much owned China and could easily beat Russian troops in skill, but with China they could beat them with numbers too.[/QUOTE] Japan and Russia fought one battle. Russia dominated, because as good as Japanese troops are, their equipment was even more shit than the Russian's, and the T-34 is better than any Japanese tank.
[QUOTE=OrionChronicles;38153864]Japan and Russia fought one battle. Russia dominated, because as good as Japanese troops are, their equipment was even more shit than the Russian's, and the T-34 is better than any Japanese tank.[/QUOTE] The T-34 was a superior tank, but I think that the superiority of the Japanese Navy, Air Force, and Army would have been enough to handle the Russians. I mean why fight a tank when you can have a plan blow it up.
[QUOTE=Skullivan21;38153982]The T-34 was a superior tank, but I think that the superiority of the Japanese Navy, Air Force, and Army would have been enough to handle the Russians. I mean why fight a tank when you can have a plan blow it up.[/QUOTE] The Russians beat the Germans, who were obviously better equipped and trained, and both Germany and Japan were fighting wars on 2 fronts, 3 if the US had done a land assault/if we were including the US in this hypothetical situation. It wouldn't have been much different for Japan, it would have just taken them a while to get their troops over there, but the sheer numbers of Russians and Chinese who would have assaulted Japan would have resulted in a devastating victory.
There's no problem a gun can't fix
[QUOTE=OrionChronicles;38153864]Japan and Russia fought one battle. Russia dominated, because as good as Japanese troops are, their equipment was even more shit than the Russian's, and the T-34 is better than any Japanese tank.[/QUOTE] the far eastern troops of the Russians were superior in training to the average Japanese in that battle. However those superior troops were pulled back to Moscow, and the Western front of Russia to combat the Germans. If Japan had coordinated with Germany early Russia would have crumbled. And that is the extent of my knowledge from my history teacher this semester
[QUOTE=TheStabbyBunny;38154280]the far eastern troops of the Russians were superior in training to the average Japanese in that battle. However those superior troops were pulled back to Moscow, and the Western front of Russia to combat the Germans. If Japan had coordinated with Germany early Russia would have crumbled. And that is the extent of my knowledge from my history teacher this semester[/QUOTE] Not necessarily, because Japan was also dividing their troops throughout southeast Asia, China, most of the Pacific, and with speculation of an attack on Australia. Japan, like Germany, would have lost due to the division of troops, and fighting too many wars on too many fronts.
[QUOTE=NuclearAnnhilation;38154279]There's no problem a gun can't fix[/QUOTE] You lied, I can't preform math problems on my gun.
[QUOTE=PaChIrA;38154323]You lied, I can't preform math problems on my gun.[/QUOTE] if billy's gun has 10 rounds in the magazine, and he fires 4 shots, how many bullets are left in the magazine?
[QUOTE=Broguts;38153575]1,260,000 Is still just over half of the battle of Stalingrad, which is considered a "win"[/QUOTE] Those estimates were just for the first few weeks of the battle. The invasion of japan could have taken years if Japan planned their resistance properly.
[QUOTE=Raijin;38154347]if billy's gun has 10 rounds in the magazine, and he fires 4 shots, how many bullets are left in the magazine?[/QUOTE] 93
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.