My theory about parallel dimensions.

[Rach Runner]

[QUOTE=stone555;26447155]This is not a theory. This is a hypothesis.[/QUOTE]

My God this.
Do people even know the definition of a fucking theory anymore?

[VeniVidiVici74]

This is Everets theory.

[One Ear Ninja]

Multiverse.

[Jad Hinto]

If this is true, then there's to many dimensions.

For you make a choice by blinking one moment, breathing, e.t.c.

Just doesn't work.

And waaay to be original.

[blacky magick]

[QUOTE=MrAfroShark70;26446765]Your theory doesn't work because you obviously do not understand the concept of dimensions judging by this part.

Your essentially stating, "When you make a decision, you pass through another dimension."[/QUOTE]

sounds liek assassians creed schitt lol

[linksysruler]

[quote]Don't be distracted by the what-ifs, should-ofs, and if-onlys. The one thing you choose for yourself, THAT is the truth of your universe.[/quote]

Kamina taught me everything I need to know about multiple universes/dimensions.

[u want my cock]

my theory about ur thread:

its gay and stupid

[Samperson123]

I wasn't ever really sure about this. I mean, if you start with the [b]exact[/b] same conditions, atom for atom, wouldn't you always get the same result? Unless there's some strange quirk of quantum mechanics or something like that, I can't see how it could be otherwise.

[Badal]

I'm getting sick of armchair scientists in GD. Please know what the hell you are talking about next time.

[Kirahazard]

Plus, everyone knows that there are infinite subtle different dimensions all held together by The Dark Tower.

Gaw, get it right.

[Block]

[QUOTE=SamPerson123;26479007]I wasn't ever really sure about this. I mean, if you start with the [b]exact[/b] same conditions, atom for atom, wouldn't you always get the same result? Unless there's some strange quirk of quantum mechanics or something like that, I can't see how it could be otherwise.[/QUOTE]
There are quantum events which are purely random.

For example, radioactive decay:
[quote]Radioactive decay is the process by which an unstable atomic nucleus loses energy by emitting ionizing particles (ionizing radiation). The emission is spontaneous, in that the nucleus decays without collision with another particle or atom. The decay is a stochastic (i.e., random) process on level of single atoms, in that according to quantum theory it is impossible to predict when a given atom will decay.[1] However, given a large number of identical atoms (nuclides) the decay rate for the collection is predictable.[/quote]

[POLOPOZOZO]

The popular theory is that there are 11 dimensions, and I'm pretty sure that has some pretty complex math and a good portion of the scientific community backing it up.

[DainBramageStud]

[QUOTE=POLOPOZOZO;26483022]The popular theory is that there are 11 dimensions, and I'm pretty sure that has some pretty complex math and a good portion of the scientific community backing it up.[/QUOTE]

that's string theory which hasn't been tested yet

also there isn't consensus

[POLOPOZOZO]

There isn't but my point is that it's legitimate, it is the popular theory, and I don't see anyone else testing its predictions with an $18 billion piece of machinery.

[editline]4th December 2010[/editline]

Compared to whatever the hell this is.