• Woman gets pregnant with brainless baby, has it anyway
    911 replies, posted
What in god's name is wrong with that woman? If you go on her blog and watch that video she has up of that Faith kid, you can see that there is something completely wrong with it... Why would you have a kid that obviously has no chance to live a life and then call it Faith? I think there's more than one person in that family that doesn't have a brain...
It is pretty sick in my opinion. If you are a god fearing person, how can you believe this baby has a soul? I mean even retarded people can think on a level, but this is a lifeless sack of meat, and is rather disturbing. I mean it is just really creepy.
[QUOTE=DesertRaptor;14789020]when i saw this: [media]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/8/8d/Enencephaly.jpg/180px-Enencephaly.jpg[/media] i yelled ZAMBEES[/QUOTE][IMG]http://i606.photobucket.com/albums/tt150/yungmak_2009/et.jpg[/IMG] ignore the motivator.
I betch'a it's like a frog head under that cute little hat.
[QUOTE=Poltergeist Three;14788822][url]http://babyfaithhope.blogspot.com/[/url] You where wondering what she's hiding under that cute little hat? Click this if you really want to: [url]http://images.google.com/images?hl=en&q=anencephaly&btnG=Search+Images&gbv=2&aq=0&oq=anen[/url] Here's a Wiki article with many more disturbing pictures, view at your own risk. [url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anencephaly[/url][/QUOTE] I couldn't freaking sleep at night because of this, as someone else said, I am scarred for life! Goddam... I hope it doesn't take the carnivorous route and learn to spread the disease on prefectly fine adults... Oh sorry! Am I making you uncomfortable?
Dear god I just looked at 2 of those videos, and I feel sick. That is a fucking scary lifeless baby. I feel sorry, it is probably in constant pain, and I don't see how anyone can believe it is right to do that.
Why did I click the google image link!? I literally screamed and put my hand over my face and the other on the screen. I ran outta hands to exit the tab
[QUOTE=itchyflakes;14792534]I get it. If the medicine she's using to keep her baby alive is giving her time with her child then so be it. She's getting it for free big deal she got lucky but when the free medicine runs out she will have to pay for it. So you're saying since it has no brain it has no use? We should get rid of trees while we're at it because they don't have a brain or feelings! Oh wait, we don't get rid of trees because they benefit us. Your logic sucks it proves that humans are a selfish race, If the baby brings joy to her even if it is only for a short while why can't she live that life and not be judge for it? The baby was a part of her it survived birth most babies with this condition usually die during birth this baby has been living for quite a while after it was born so that in itself is a miracle. Don't judge her live your life her situation isn't affecting you or anyone else.[/QUOTE] Whatever the hell you meant to say here got lost in a storm of bullshit, bat shit, and idiot. You're right, trees don't have a brain, or feelings. But they aren't meant to. Babies are supposed to, and when a babies lacking the brain, they will die. Why are you trying to prolong the inevitable death ahead of it. Especially when it consumes resources that would be well used else where on conscious, living, and you know, actual fucking poeple.
[QUOTE=HumanAbyss;14793258]words[/QUOTE] I'm saying humans are selfish and keep only what benefits them
[QUOTE=itchyflakes;14793313]I'm saying humans are selfish and keep only what benefits them[/QUOTE] Dude, I'm thinking of the baby in all of this. Think of that abortion as a preemptive mercy kill.
[QUOTE=FingerSpazem;14793469]Dude, I'm thinking of the baby in all of this. Think of that abortion as a preemptive mercy kill.[/QUOTE] The baby has no conscious thought and no need for mercy since it can’t process anything, Technically speaking. But I agree with you 100%. The mother must be one fucked up person.
[QUOTE=itchyflakes;14792534]I get it. If the medicine she's using to keep her baby alive is giving her time with her child then so be it. She's getting it for free big deal she got lucky but when the free medicine runs out she will have to pay for it. So you're saying since it has no brain it has no use? We should get rid of trees while we're at it because they don't have a brain or feelings! Oh wait, we don't get rid of trees because they benefit us. Your logic sucks it proves that humans are a selfish race, If the baby brings joy to her even if it is only for a short while why can't she live that life and not be judge for it? The baby was a part of her it survived birth most babies with this condition usually die during birth this baby has been living for quite a while after it was born so that in itself is a miracle. Don't judge her live your life her situation isn't affecting you or anyone else.[/QUOTE] Can you imagine living life not even knowing you exist? Can you imagine the shear fucking emptiness of it all? No emotion, ability to speak, or motor functions... Would you spare your child that living death? Or in your own greed would you keep that... thing in a hellish exsistance just to have something to care for, touch and place your evidently hypocrattic love into?
That is sad. I couldn't stand to see that everyday if I was that woman. What a crazy fuck.
[QUOTE=Poltergeist Three;14788822]can it feel pain?[/QUOTE] No brain - No pain
[QUOTE=itchyflakes;14793313]I'm saying humans are selfish and keep only what benefits them[/QUOTE] This doesn't make any sense at all... You're saying humans are selfish because they keep trees? If you were trying to say that the mother is selfish then I agree with you fully, but you'll have to forgive me because I can't translate that block of text into plain English. If, on the other hand you were saying that the mother was not selfish for keeping the baby, then you should probably go look up what the word selfish means. She is Christian, so she believes that the baby has a soul, and keeping that soul trapped in a useless, brainless body is probably one of the most selfish things that I've ever heard of.
[QUOTE=Phantom Lord;14793767]Can you imagine living life not even knowing you exist? Can you imagine the shear fucking emptiness of it all? No emotion, ability to speak, or motor functions... Would you spare your child that living death? Or in your own greed would you keep that... thing in a hellish exsistance just to have something to care for, touch and place your evidently hypocrattic love into?[/QUOTE] The baby has no feelings but the woman that gave birth to it does. It grew inside her, she's attached to it. I'm not saying what she's doing is right but she fell in love with the baby that grew inside her and even if it seems wrong to you or anyone else how is it affecting the world? is it changing your life style? The woman keeping her child is not going to affect anyone so why does it matter to you or anyone else? The tree bit in one of my posts was because people were comparing the baby to a tree. The baby wouldn't benefit humans because it has nothing to give so people thing it's better for it to be dead, on the other hand trees don't have a brain or feelings but that doesn't stop humans from destroying the trees because they have something of value to us. It was a shitty way of putting it I didn't do a very good job but anyway if she keeps her baby and it's making her happy who cares what others think.
I'm sad now =( and those pictures are just disturbing........
This is a sad story, why do you guys always try to joke with this
[QUOTE=itchyflakes;14793313]I'm saying humans are selfish and keep only what benefits them[/QUOTE] You've already defeated your own argument. The mother is being selfish keeping this thing alive(because it certainly isn't human) while using up resources. She's being more selfish than us.
[QUOTE=itchyflakes;14793879]The baby has no feelings but the woman that gave birth to it does. It grew inside her, she's attached to it. I'm not saying what she's doing is right but she fell in love with the baby that grew inside her and even if it seems wrong to you or anyone else how is it affecting the world? is it changing your life style? The woman keeping her child is not going to affect anyone so why does it matter to you or anyone else? The tree bit in one of my posts was because people were comparing the baby to a tree. The baby wouldn't benefit humans because it has nothing to give so people thing it's better for it to be dead, on the other hand trees don't have a brain or feelings but that doesn't stop humans from destroying the trees because they have something of value to us. It was a shitty way of putting it I didn't do a very good job but anyway if she keeps her baby and it's making her happy who cares what others think.[/QUOTE] She needed these expensive pills and someone happened to drop them off at the pharmacist or some shit so she got them for free. Someone else who actually fucking needed them could have gotten them.
[QUOTE=Canuhearme?;14792527]It's consuming resources, and not just any resources, its consuming medicine with absolutely no hope of recovery. It's the closest thing to a parasite I can think of.[/QUOTE] ITT: Bioshock references/Objectivist philosophy.
[QUOTE=itchyflakes;14793879]The baby has no feelings but the woman that gave birth to it does. It grew inside her, she's attached to it. I'm not saying what she's doing is right but she fell in love with the baby that grew inside her and even if it seems wrong to you or anyone else how is it affecting the world? is it changing your life style? The woman keeping her child is not going to affect anyone so why does it matter to you or anyone else?[/QUOTE] It matters to me because I was a miracle child. I was born 4 months early. Now, does that make my life any more valuable than hers? No. What I'm trying to say is, if you had any rational thought at all, would you let your child suffer? Or would you end it before it began?
In the videos its kind of hard to tell the difference between it and a normal baby this is fucked up though, I wonder when it will die
[QUOTE=HumanAbyss;14793922]You've already defeated your own argument. The mother is being selfish keeping this thing alive(because it certainly isn't human) while using up resources. She's being more selfish than us.[/QUOTE] My feelings exactly. This lady must have some serious mental issues if she is able to justify keeping this thing alive.
im just saying what if What if that is just the next generation of humans and we are developing slowly and all the video games and tv and Chemicals we take in everyday is slowly evolving us into these brain dead creatures and we will die off Or just suffer because we have no brain+No more Hot chicks! D=
[QUOTE=Phantom Lord;14793967]I was born 5 months early.[/QUOTE] nno #
Google AdSense Strikes again! [img]http://img411.imageshack.us/img411/5238/copyofmodsquad.jpg[/img]
Also, on the topic of if a conscious baby was to be kept alive through a state of intense suffering for a few more months/years of it, I would tihnk that's just torture.. The baby doesn't deserve that. A tortured life is no life at all.
[QUOTE=DieHardDeus;14794000]Google AdSense Strikes again! image[/QUOTE] [IMG]http://googleads.g.doubleclick.net/pagead/imgad?id=CP6Jj5Ovu8-fgwEQ2AUYTzIIlL3_zZzUOhk[/IMG]
[QUOTE=Uberslug;14793996]nno #[/QUOTE] Are you saying that isn't possible? My girlfriend was born close to 4 months premature with no real ribcage, and lacking developed organs, but she's still around now obviously, being almost 20.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.