Conspiratard gets tazered for being a fucking lunatic
98 replies, posted
Oh man that was good at the end.
Like I didn't expect his reaction to being tased to be that funny.
But it was like "Aauuuughhhhh! Ahhhhhhhh!" And then the wavering "Stop please..."
It's absolutely ridiculous when people go around trying to get beaten by police or security guards just to satisfy some agenda.
This video kind of takes a turn for the tragic when you remember his [I]mother[/I] is there to see the entire thing, from his delusional ranting to seeing the situation escalate until they needed to use a taser on him.
It's just sad, you know? Unless she's in on the same agenda he is, I'm really feeling sorry for the mother here (how do you think she feels seeing her son growing up to be [I]that[/I].)
[QUOTE=Canuhearme?;37706325]This video kind of takes a turn for the tragic when you remember his [I]mother[/I] is there to see the entire thing, from his delusional ranting to seeing the situation escalate until they needed to use a taser on him.
It's just sad, you know? Unless she's in on the same agenda he is, I'm really feeling sorry for the mother here (how do you think she feels seeing her son growing up to be [I]that[/I].)[/QUOTE]
I'm thinking she was there because he has some sort of mental problem. What he says make absolutely no sense at all, its not even coherent. If that was the case I would hope she realizes taking him to a court house is a terrible idea.
And, you're using a...
i don't really think he has a mental problem. he is just one of the many idiots who act like they can outsmart authority by saying their rights are being violated.
[QUOTE=BusterBluth;37706448]I'm thinking she was there because he has some sort of mental problem. What he says make absolutely no sense at all, its not even coherent. If that was the case I would hope she realizes taking him to a court house is a terrible idea.[/QUOTE]
No people actually think they can cause shit and they can get off scott free by rattling off unrelated laws they just read about on wikipedia, and use the video to cause a shitstorm.
[QUOTE=jaybuz;37704473]I hate it when American's start spouting out shit about rights and freedom thinking they can do whatever they want. Like it's some kind of ultimate shield.[/QUOTE]
Well, they are supposed to be a shield against the government. But only the rights you actually have.
This is the full version if anyone is interested, he's a real fucking douche
[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uz5EVcJZkU0[/media]
sounds like the same dude that was walking around with an assault rifle trying to get a bad reaction from police
[QUOTE=fruxodaily;37707638]This is the full version if anyone is interested, he's a real fucking douche
[/QUOTE]
It really infuriates me as to why he doesn't seem to grasp why you're not allowed to have cameras in the court-room without permission. I mean fuck, this is a thing every activist acts like they don't understand even though it's a simple matter of thinking it through.
They don't allow cameras in courtrooms because you have the risk of crazies (such as that guy) getting information they could use to kill, kidnap or otherwise harm a judge, jury, witness testifying against you or any number of people present in the courtroom that day. Not to mention they can sway proceedings one way or the other (people react differently on camera) and they're very, [I]very [/I]distracting. Standing before a judge and attorney is hard enough, but doing it on camera or while people take pictures is even worse.
[QUOTE=Alcoholocaust;37704774]HA;P! ADMIN BAN HE SHITCURITY IS GRIFFING ME! ZOMG WTF ADMINBUS
[sp]For you who dosent get it, its the common response of a shitlord on SS13 when he gets what he deserves, he will splutter made up spesslaw all the time and then take it to OOC if admins dont respond the same second. I am an admin on a sometimes/sometimes server called Constructionstation13[/sp][/QUOTE]
Are you advertising your gmod server? Get the banhammer.
I was about to say that he was completely in the wrong to taze the man for spouting nonsense, but when I saw that he actually attempted to get through despite prior warnings, it was handled how it should have been.
[QUOTE=rrunyan;37702816]So that's what a taser looks like at point blank.
Bzzzt.
Also he was visably shaken afterwards, I could tell by the tone of his voice, yes.
What was he even trying to prove anyway?[/QUOTE]
Wasn't trying to prove anything. Just another GOTCHA fuckhead who think they know more than actual law enforcement because they spent 2 hours reading Wikipedia. Same type of person that open carry a fucking Mp5 or AK47 trying to provoke police, then post it to Youtube or Liveleak or where ever with their POLICE STATE bullshit
Apparently he follows a sect called the [URL="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freemen_on_the_land"]Freemen on the Land[/URL]. Basically it means they believe all law is contractual, and they choose what to follow and what not to follow, law of the land doesn't apply to them, and they define their own rights. Pretty stupid. He has an extremely loose concept of "laws" and I highly doubt he understands how any legal or justice system works.
Here's more from this moron.
[video=youtube;svdQd5GPXl8]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=svdQd5GPXl8&feature=youtu.be[/video]
At first I thought the guy that tasered him was partly in the wrong for tasering him so quickly. Because it seemed like he didn't really get much of a warning... but after watching the long version, he so fucking deserved it. Pretty sad to know he lives in my state. Hes one of those HUR DURR I KNOEW LAW, YOU DUMB OFFICIAL.
[QUOTE=Ast_risk;37708762]Apparently he follows a sect called the [URL="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freemen_on_the_land"]Freemen on the Land[/URL]. Basically it means they believe all law is contractual, and they choose what to follow and what not to follow, law of the land doesn't apply to them, and they define their own rights. Pretty stupid. He has an extremely loose concept of "laws" and I highly doubt he understands how any legal or justice system works.
Here's more from this moron.
[video=youtube;svdQd5GPXl8]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=svdQd5GPXl8&feature=youtu.be[/video][/QUOTE]
this guy is a cunt, yeah you may have a legal right to bear arms BUT WHY IN PUBLIC AND ESPECIALLY IN AN AREA WHERE KIDS OR FAMILIES COULD BE
holy shit
I love how his smug fuck voice breaks at the end when they're putting the cuffs on him.
I can understand anti-authoritarian sentiment and all that fun shit but what the fuck is this guy even doing? He's picking a weird passive aggressive fight with what is essentially a security guard.
This guy was totally asked for it, he should have seen it coming.
[QUOTE=fruxodaily;37707638]This is the full version if anyone is interested, he's a real fucking douche
[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uz5EVcJZkU0[/media][/QUOTE]
This makes me even happier than he got his ass shut down. What a fucking d-bag.
I hope he gets some time to cool off in jail.
Refusing to give any sort of common identification, not cooperating with staff in a courthouse for no reason and generally making an unwanted scene while flexing a camera isn't exercising your rights..
It's called being a fool with a distorted reality of what you're entitlements are.
The tazer would have only been unnecessary, If the tin foil hat guy didn't try to force entry after they clearly stated no cameras allowed.
[QUOTE=GhettoGeek;37703717]Can anyone who actually knows about law verify if that guy knew what he was talking about or was just crazy[/QUOTE]
I couldn't quite tell, but from what you could see it wasn't battery when the cop pushed him because the crazy was by legal definition the "actor" by trying to shove through what looked like federal agents on government property. He also pushed him back with an open hand, which makes a bigger difference than you'd think
[QUOTE=Doctor Dave;37708589]Are you advertising your gmod server? Get the banhammer.[/QUOTE]
All those boxes, your way.
No. The video reminded me of Space Station 13. Where the security staff uses stunguns and batons.
The spoiler text was just so people got the reference. :buddy:
[QUOTE=Ast_risk;37708762]
Here's more from this moron.
[video=youtube;svdQd5GPXl8]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=svdQd5GPXl8&feature=youtu.be[/video][/QUOTE]
No, that cant be the same guy.
[editline]18th September 2012[/editline]
Nevermind its not
[QUOTE=Ast_risk;37708762]Apparently he follows a sect called the [URL="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freemen_on_the_land"]Freemen on the Land[/URL]. Basically it means they believe all law is contractual, and they choose what to follow and what not to follow, law of the land doesn't apply to them, and they define their own rights. Pretty stupid. He has an extremely loose concept of "laws" and I highly doubt he understands how any legal or justice system works.
Here's more from this moron.
[video=youtube;svdQd5GPXl8]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=svdQd5GPXl8&feature=youtu.be[/video][/QUOTE]
Wow that guy is a huge dick. He has a gun, a video corder, and he thinks that the police are out to get him? For all they know he's about to start a fucking shooting, injurying or worse killing, innocent bi-standers.
He did the right thing, that guy was just being an annoying asshole who thought he was above the law. Should have tazed him twice.
"I'm not a person, I'm a man"
WTF is this guy's thinking process?
Best part was "That was a nice speech but you're still not coming in."
[editline]18th September 2012[/editline]
[QUOTE=fruxodaily;37709055]this guy is a cunt, yeah you may have a legal right to bear arms BUT WHY IN PUBLIC AND ESPECIALLY IN AN AREA WHERE KIDS OR FAMILIES COULD BE
holy shit[/QUOTE]
Open carry activists are the most annoying assholes ever.
[QUOTE=fruxodaily;37707638]This is the full version if anyone is interested, he's a real fucking douche
[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uz5EVcJZkU0[/media][/QUOTE]
It says the video is private. :(
Personally, I think the guy with the taser should have probably given him more of a warning but I think we all know it would have just gone on for longer, by the looks of how quickly he responded he either knew about this person with the camera or it has happened before with someone else.
Legally justified or not, that was fantastic to watch.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.