NDAA Bill Discussion Thread V1: "4th Amendment, we'll miss you. <3"
65 replies, posted
[QUOTE=CrispexOps;34028884]I'm not concerned. Martial law can be enacted at any time anyway, don't forget. During martial law times the military can detain anyone anyway.[/QUOTE]
It may sound sensationalist but I for one don't want a snowball effect or something. "Oh, well we have the patriot act so it isn't a big deal if this is passed too etc"
I know it is a fucking piss poor example but they both are for fighting terrorism
I think we should just take a stand and say [b]"No, fuck you!"[/b] right now rather than later when something else is on the brink of fucking with our "liberties"
You can't help but giggle for a brief second though at the whole "lets combat terrorism by oppressing and snooping on people on our own soil america is a warzone gaaawwww they envy their own liberties"
[QUOTE=Remscar;33740649] TL;DR: Bunch of BS, as long as you are not a terrorist, your fine.[/QUOTE]
The problem with this is that it targets a subversive group which is an ideology. It isn't as simple as saying "No i'm not a terrorist" it's that they can target anyone and everyone, poor or rich, political activist or someone who shrugs it off, thiest or athiest.
When you target a subversive group you are given a wide target ranging from many individuals, surely one may say they're not a terrorist but one doesn't know because there's no physical proof, and one may be held because of "Conspiracy to commit terrorism."
It is exactly like the socialist hate of the 1950's, "Pinko" hate.
[QUOTE=Remscar;33740649]
TL;DR: Bunch of BS, as long as you are not a terrorist, your fine.[/QUOTE]
Can you prove that you're not a terrorist? Wait, shit! You don't get a trial.
