either way, I like them down my throat, cut means I can wrap my tongue around the head easier, uncut feels better in the ass.
[QUOTE=DinoJesus;27255381]What about the health benefits? Nobody's mention anything about that.[/QUOTE]
Because they're negligible at best
[QUOTE=DinoJesus;27255381]What about the health benefits? Nobody's mention anything about that.[/QUOTE]
[quote=Wikipedie: The Source of all Knowledge]In 2010, Bollinger estimated a death rate of 9.01 per 100,000, or 117 per year in the United States.[150][/quote]
That might not seem like a significant amount of deaths to you, but that's still 117 children that otherwise WOULDN'T die if their foreskin had just been left alone. And if you're one of those 117 families that baby's death is gonna mean the whole damn world to you.
I don't think health benefits really matter when there's a risk of complications and death.
Uncut without a doubt. Cutting of something down there makes no sense, unless there is a medical condition that forces you to take that decision. If you do that to your baby without a real reason to you are crazy in my opinion. Glad I live in Norway, where it is very rare.
[b]1[/b] Many older men, who have bladder or prostate gland problems, also develop difficulties with their foreskins due to their surgeon's handling, cleaning, and using instruments. Some of these patients will need circumcising. Afterwards it is often astonishing to find some who have never ever seen their glans (knob) exposed before!
[b]2[/b] Some older men develop cancer of the penis - about 1 in 1000 - fairly rare, but tragic if you or your son are in that small statistic. Infant circumcision gives almost 100% protection, and young adult circumcision also gives a large degree of protection.
[b]3[/b] Cancer of the cervix in women is due to the Human Papilloma Virus. It thrives under and on the foreskin from where it can be transmitted during intercourse. An article in the British Medical Journal in April 2002 suggested that at least 20% of cancer of the cervix would be avoided if all men were circumcised. Surely that alone makes it worth doing?
[b]4[/b] Protection against HIV and AIDS. Another British Medical Journal article in May 2000 suggested that circumcised men are 8 times less likely to contract the HIV virus. (It is very important here to say that the risk is still far too high and that condoms and safe sex must be used - this applies also to preventing cancer of the cervix in women who have several partners.)
A BBC television programme in November 2000 showed two Ugandan tribes across the valley from one another. One practised circumcision and had very little AIDS, whereas, it was common in the other tribe, who then also started circumcising. This programme showed how the infection thrived in the lining of the foreskin, making it much easier to pass on.
[b]5[/b] As with HIV, so some protection exists against other sexually transmitted infections. Accordingly, if a condom splits or comes off, there is some protection for the couple. However, the only safe sex is to stick to one partner or abstain.
[b]6[/b] Lots of men, and their partners, prefer the appearance of their penis after circumcision, It is odour-free, it feels cleaner, and they enjoy better sex. Awareness of a good body image is a very important factor in building self confidence.
[b]7[/b] Balanitis is an unpleasant, often recurring, inflammation of the glans. It is quite common and can be prevented by circumcision.
[b]8[/b] Urinary tract infections sometimes occur in babies and can be quite serious. Circumcision in infancy makes it 10 times less likely.
[url]http://www.circinfo.com/benefits/bmc.html[/url]
The biggest reason for circumcision is cleanliness, from what I understand.
Also, there are no proven health benefits with either, so don't mention that.
[quote]It is odour-free, it feels cleaner, and they enjoy better sex.[/quote]
False, False and REALLY false.
You must be having really bad sex for the appereance of your dick to make a difference.
Also, you lose lots of sensitivity when you get circ'd
[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c8voOaGouDM&feature=related[/media]
I had mine cut when I was 3-4, since I had some problems down there :(
I'm cut and I'm pretty much just like "Ok the difference is?". It doesn't mean much to me.
Why did you supply pictures? I'm sure we could've worked it out ourselves.
Cut.
Uncut because here in Sweden, we don't cut poor defenceless baby penis.
Wow, never thought I would use all those words in the same sentence.
[QUOTE=GeneralFredrik;27255619]Uncut because here in Sweden, we don't cut poor defenceless baby penis.
Wow, never thought I would use all those words in the same sentence.[/QUOTE]
I agree, circumcision should be 15+
I like to blow air into my foreskin with a drinking straw then make "dick farts"
[QUOTE=DienDwemar;27255571]Why did you supply pictures? I'm sure we could've worked it out ourselves.[/QUOTE]
Speak for yourself.
I like how the second image is obviously someone who doesn't wash their dick off :v:
Heres my reasoning, were born with it, so why remove it ? It was meant to be there for a reason.
Sure you can say the same about cutting hair - but that grows back.
dicks are ugly either way
[QUOTE=Gordy H.;27255532][b]1[/b] Many older men, who have bladder or prostate gland problems, also develop difficulties with their foreskins due to their surgeon's handling, cleaning, and using instruments. Some of these patients will need circumcising. Afterwards it is often astonishing to find some who have never ever seen their glans (knob) exposed before!
[b]2[/b] Some older men develop cancer of the penis - about 1 in 1000 - fairly rare, but tragic if you or your son are in that small statistic. Infant circumcision gives almost 100% protection, and young adult circumcision also gives a large degree of protection.
[b]3[/b] Cancer of the cervix in women is due to the Human Papilloma Virus. It thrives under and on the foreskin from where it can be transmitted during intercourse. An article in the British Medical Journal in April 2002 suggested that at least 20% of cancer of the cervix would be avoided if all men were circumcised. Surely that alone makes it worth doing?
[b]4[/b] Protection against HIV and AIDS. Another British Medical Journal article in May 2000 suggested that circumcised men are 8 times less likely to contract the HIV virus. (It is very important here to say that the risk is still far too high and that condoms and safe sex must be used - this applies also to preventing cancer of the cervix in women who have several partners.)
A BBC television programme in November 2000 showed two Ugandan tribes across the valley from one another. One practised circumcision and had very little AIDS, whereas, it was common in the other tribe, who then also started circumcising. This programme showed how the infection thrived in the lining of the foreskin, making it much easier to pass on.
[b]5[/b] As with HIV, so some protection exists against other sexually transmitted infections. Accordingly, if a condom splits or comes off, there is some protection for the couple. However, the only safe sex is to stick to one partner or abstain.
[b]6[/b] Lots of men, and their partners, prefer the appearance of their penis after circumcision, It is odour-free, it feels cleaner, and they enjoy better sex. Awareness of a good body image is a very important factor in building self confidence.
[b]7[/b] Balanitis is an unpleasant, often recurring, inflammation of the glans. It is quite common and can be prevented by circumcision.
[b]8[/b] Urinary tract infections sometimes occur in babies and can be quite serious. Circumcision in infancy makes it 10 times less likely.
[url]http://www.circinfo.com/benefits/bmc.html[/url]
The biggest reason for circumcision is cleanliness, from what I understand.[/QUOTE]
no fuk u
I heard that uncuts have a better chance of fighting off infections...
[QUOTE=DinoJesus;27255381]What about the health benefits? Nobody's mention anything about that.[/QUOTE]
Only apply if you're uncut and refuse to wash your cock, otherwise there are no health problems.
Always found the whole point about it being cleaner to be cut complete bullshit. That's like complaining your armpit stinks so you cut your arm off.
I HATE HAVING TO SHAVE! *Rips jaw off"
This thread contains [img]http://spe.fotolog.com/photo/14/13/0/elabuelo81/1234559853801_f.jpg[/img].
Uncut.
Cut, but not by choice. My unborn sons won't be cut.
ITT cut people say cut is better and uncut people say uncut is better.
Uncut is better.
Circumcised penises are better looking than uncut ones.
Cut
[QUOTE=Roll_Program;27255039]Uncut.
Sexier, more sensitive and usually not with dry as fuck skin.
People I've been with who had uncut dicks enjoyed sex more than cut.[/QUOTE]
Weird i heard otherwise due to chafing.
[QUOTE=Half-Life;27257913]Circumcised penises are better looking than uncut ones.[/QUOTE]
yeah but they're both ugly still
Cut.
Though the doctor screwed up my circumcision when I was like 10 days old, so they had to fix it when I was 4. :confused:
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
