[QUOTE=Zukriuchen;49707101]If you think this means Trump plans every word or that he's some sort of debate genius you [I]completely[/I] missed the point of the video
It's an analysis of the way he talks, the points he focuses on, his mannerisms. You can do that with literally everyone. Every public figure out there is going to have these sorts of strengths and weaknesses.[/QUOTE]
Analyzing how Trump speaks would probably get more views and likes than analyzing how Jeb Bush speaks.
[QUOTE=SpotEnemyBoat;49707009]Very funny, but he has a iq of 156. He is self made a billion dollar company, he sold millions on book he authored, graduate of Wharton school of business.
First people say he's Hitler because he's a good speaker, then people say he's dumb. Will you liberals ever make up your god damn minds?[/QUOTE]
You don't need to be a liberal to call Trump dumb.
[QUOTE=Garrot;49707179]You don't need to be a liberal to call Trump dumb.[/QUOTE]
Either establisment neocons or liberals, both love to ignore the facts.
This thread has become terrible real fast, Jesus I can't wait for 2016 to be over already :v:
[QUOTE=SpotEnemyBoat;49707009]Very funny, but he has a iq of 156. He is self made a billion dollar company, he sold millions on book he authored, graduate of Wharton school of business.
First people say he's Hitler because he's a good speaker, then people say he's dumb. Will you liberals ever make up your god damn minds?[/QUOTE]
1: IQ tests have been proven to be meaningless in the past few years as no single test can truly quantify a person's raw intellect. I can go take any random IQ test online, free or paid, and come out with wildly different numbers. I took several psychologist-provided tests when I was in high school and got several results between 125 to 195. It's up to chance that you happen to be capable of completing certain answers to the broad set of questions and memory exercises presented in a given test. (also I suck at math but ADD meds spiked that one out the roof)
2: he got a kick start of 1 million dollars from his dad, and later an inheritance estimated somewhere between $40m-$200m. Self made is furthest from the truth, he's been playing with free money since college. He'd have more money now if he invested and/or flat out put money in a bank and gathered interest than if he had spent it all trying to run businesses. He's forced his properties to file for bankruptcy numerous times to take care of their debts and when asked why he'd do that he just says that's the right way to do it. Same thing for the hundreds of civil lawsuits, he and his lawyer state that it's just the way to do business in this country.
3: He's smart, in the fact he's devious- He absolutely knows what he's doing and saying, and it's not that he's "just speaking his mind" without fear of repurcussion. It's simplified and dastardly in many cases, strikes the right chords with the large radical sect this country has and riling up interest, while expanding a few notes to make the whole dish seem a bit more palatable. The thing is, the more extreme someone is about politics (or anything), the more likely they'll do the advertising for you. They'll try to convince family, friends, neighbors. By reaching out to the people who are REALLY worked up, those people will trickle down their reasoning to less radical people around them, who in turn do the same. If anything is 'trickle down' in this country, it's favoritism
The strange thing is, everything he said about politics for the last 30 years was that he doesn't like how the country is going, and that if he ever ran for president it wouldn't be on behalf of the two major parties because they're both [even in the 80's/90's] leaning way too far left and right that nobody's meeting in the center anymore [note: he was a registered republican but talked about considering 'leaving' the party]. It always sounds like wishful conspiracy theorizing but this history definitely lends to the idea he could actually be doing this to break up the status quo of hard left/right candidates, by hijacking the party with the hardest lean by appealing to the near-tribal core of people's political beliefs
[QUOTE=DeadCow;49703729]Although I don't like Trump, the thread title is incorrect. One of his supporters called Ted Cruz a pussy, not Trump himself. Pretty misleading[/QUOTE]
Nah, he definitely called him a pussy. Indirectly, sure, but you're being dense if you think Trump didn't go out of his way to call Ted Cruz a pussy.
He didn't call him a pussy, someone in the audience did. They're right though.
[QUOTE=Jack32;49710464]He didn't call him a pussy, someone in the audience did. They're right though.[/QUOTE]
how can people be [I]this[/I] literal-minded that he's an innocent snowflake in the situation
I don't care if you say "but they started it", he repeated it to the audience to re-express the opinion. If you don't want to say it for yourself, stop after the first "never say that again". Tell your crowd to be respectful. Don't replace your description in the speech with that shit, hold for applause with a giant grin, and move on to the next topic. I'd be willing to bet the crowd member was asked to shout it out just to set up the zinger
[QUOTE=Cone;49707147]being hitler and being stupid are not mutually exclusive
[IMG]http://i.imgur.com/dcBIECM.png[/IMG]
"durr its a car"[/QUOTE]
Yea, Hitler's Car Of The People did awful in sales.
Hitler is a monster but of all the things to make him look like the piece of shit he was, you picked one of the most successful vehicles ever made?
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.