• Photo Offtopic Thread v 1.8 2013.02
    6,481 replies, posted
has anyone here cut a pizza with a spoon before [editline]24th April 2014[/editline] today i've done it for the third time in my life; 9/10 would recommend
[QUOTE=Uber|nooB;44635543]has anyone here cut a pizza with a spoon before[/QUOTE] You mean there's an easier way?
i've began eating pizzas whole to save me having to use/wash/find any cutlery
student protip: if you cut your pizzas into 4 pieces, start cutting them into 6 now, regardless of what size they are pizzas suddenly start to feel way more filling seriously this will make your life so much better
i usually cut pizzas into 8 but to save on washing up at uni i fold them calzoneeeee
cut the pizza with another pizza; use the boxes as plates problem solved
cut the box with pizza, use pizza as plate
[QUOTE=Uber|nooB;44635796]student protip: if you cut your pizzas into 4 pieces, start cutting them into 6 now, regardless of what size they are pizzas suddenly start to feel way more filling seriously this will make your life so much better[/QUOTE] [video=youtube;tDT-p1RRll0]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tDT-p1RRll0[/video]
i saw a news article on facebook that said kids are getting high by putting burts bees lip balm on their eyelids didnt work, eyes watering furiously
[QUOTE=dwt110;44636224]i saw a news article on facebook that said kids are getting high by putting burts bees lip balm on their eyelids didnt work, eyes watering furiously[/QUOTE] why would you even???
The ancient Mayans used to get high by mixing chicken excrement and olive oil, then cutting a wound on their foot and pouring the liquid in
that's how they invented chocolate too
[QUOTE=Eltro102;44634745]uber noob but also everyone else what is you are flickr also emily20 your flickr link under ur name links to a diff person from your photos[/QUOTE] what the ducck ?! who does it link to haha?! oh I just checked, thats unfortunate haha, how do i change that?
[QUOTE=emily20;44636742]what the ducck ?! who does it link to haha?! oh I just checked, thats unfortunate haha, how do i change that?[/QUOTE] Go to your profile in the Upper right corner, then click on the about me tab, and paste "92309989@N08" (without quotes) as your flickr username
cut pizzas with scissors
[IMG]http://www.blessthisstuff.com/imagens/stuff/img_pizza_scissors.jpg[/IMG]
This discussion is stupid. [IMG]http://i.imgur.com/qmO5BMU.jpg[/IMG]
agreed
[QUOTE=Roll_Program;44641820]This discussion is stupid. [IMG]http://i.imgur.com/qmO5BMU.jpg[/IMG][/QUOTE] no it's not, I actually find this pizza slicer a lot better [img]http://s8.postimg.org/e4w4lmoat/tryme.jpg[/img]
Kodak ultra max or ultra max gold?
Probably not any different really. For 400 speed film most people say Fuji superia is better (or perhaps superior).
With the cheapest going for £7 for one roll I think I'm going to pass.
jesus
shiiiit did I really submit a dissertation this afternoon [editline]25th April 2014[/editline] it still doesn't real
I just bought 19 rolls of kodak ultra max, so I suspect I should have enough film for a little while.
i just found four rolls of film cleaning my room earlier today. my girlfriend gave them to me on my birthday and i completely forgot.
[QUOTE=Slippery-Q;44646395]i just found four rolls of film cleaning my room earlier today. my girlfriend gave them to me on my birthday and i completely forgot.[/QUOTE] I found $100 last time I cleaned my room, it was like a reward for cleaning! Also you math wiz people, how many possible pixel (picture) combinations are there for a gameboy camera? It is 160x144 pixels (originally more but downsampled for AA removal), and has 4 different shades per pixel. I'm guessing you do (160^4x144^4)^2 but I was never very good at math ;(
Try taking a panorama with the gameboy
[QUOTE=Trogdon;44648237]I found $100 last time I cleaned my room, it was like a reward for cleaning! Also you math wiz people, how many possible pixel (picture) combinations are there for a gameboy camera? It is 160x144 pixels (originally more but downsampled for AA removal), and has 4 different shades per pixel. I'm guessing you do (160^4x144^4)^2 but I was never very good at math ;([/QUOTE] Wow I thought of the same thing last night. It's 4^(160*144). Imagine something higher res and with more colors. Like 640x480 and 256 colors. 256^(640*480) possibilities. Going through all of them if one possibility would appear for a second would take (1.6*10)^739792 times the age of the universe. But still everything what could possibly be displayed will appear at some point. This post for example.
wasn't there a project that did exactly that, create all possible pixel combinations for a small resolution grayscale image, someone posted it in here one time
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.