does anyone here use computer post processing on their film pictures (like color correction, noise reduction, ect)
Never use any ever, personally feel it detracts from the films nature.
[QUOTE=notlabbet;41979967]does anyone here use computer post processing on their film pictures (like color correction, noise reduction, ect)[/QUOTE]
always
[editline]26th August 2013[/editline]
I only do what's necessary to bring out the actual detail of the negative though. scanners can be harsh it seems
I have only ever used it for color correction, mostly fixing white balance screwed up by florescent lights.
[editline]26th August 2013[/editline]
I am shopping for a wide angle lens for my minolta, should I go with the 35mm 2.8, or the 28mm 2.8?
I already have the 45mm 2, and the 50mm 1.7.
[QUOTE=FlippR;41980040]always
[editline]26th August 2013[/editline]
I only do what's necessary to bring out the actual detail of the negative though. scanners can be harsh it seems[/QUOTE]
[IMG]http://i.imgur.com/dQs6R98.jpg[/IMG]
photoshop can do wonders
do you scan yourself? I've never had problems like that, but I get mine scanned where they're developed.
yes. The color cast is from developing myself and being bad at it
Kudos to you for doing it tho. I need to learn and more money is just flying out of my pocket the more I procrastinate.
i don't do it anymore because of the aforementioned
god photoshop's sharpening algorithm is so much better than lightroom's it hurts
every time i edit something in lightroom i wish i did it in photoshop instead but my cs5 doesn't take RAW files from my cameras
[QUOTE=Trogdon;41980875]god photoshop's sharpening algorithm is so much better than lightroom's it hurts
every time i edit something in lightroom i wish i did it in photoshop instead but my cs5 doesn't take RAW files from my cameras[/QUOTE]
the last camera raw update for cs5 was 6.7, have you tried it?
[url]http://www.adobe.com/support/downloads/detail.jsp?ftpID=5371[/url]
[QUOTE=Trogdon;41980875]god photoshop's sharpening algorithm is so much better than lightroom's it hurts
every time i edit something in lightroom i wish i did it in photoshop instead but my cs5 doesn't take RAW files from my cameras[/QUOTE]
I like how PS has a bajillion different ways to sharpen.
sitting with uber noob admiring how shite my photos are in this gallery
(they are p good)
[IMG]http://i.imgur.com/pDX231V.jpg[/IMG]
Off to Smugglers Festival again this weekend to photograph the festival.
I shot it last year too :)
[url]http://flickriver.com/photos/edwinquast/sets/72157631463448292/[/url]
[IMG]http://distilleryimage10.ak.instagram.com/5d7b5aa80f4911e3af2c22000a1f9069_7.jpg[/IMG]
spot the pishy photos
[QUOTE=codenamecueball;41989114][IMG]http://distilleryimage10.ak.instagram.com/5d7b5aa80f4911e3af2c22000a1f9069_7.jpg[/IMG]
spot the pishy photos[/QUOTE]
The ones similar to your avatar? :P
[QUOTE=Roll_Program;41984649]I like how PS has a bajillion different ways to sharpen.[/QUOTE]
yeah, sharpening is the best, i apply it to all my photos
[img]http://cl.ly/R44P/sharp.jpg[/img]
That image is so sharp it feels like knives are stabbing my eyes every time I scroll
[QUOTE=phytocide;41993249]yeah, sharpening is the best, i apply it to all my photos
[img]http://cl.ly/R44P/sharp.jpg[/img][/QUOTE]
solve the maze
Flying to Venice in the morning :dance:
currently watching gran torino
omg
im so sad i missed this when it was in theaters because so far its really good
the only other clint eastwood movie i have seen is letters from iwo jima, but he didn't act in that so it doesnt really count
[editline]29th August 2013[/editline]
i cried at the end
[QUOTE=Him1411;41995885]Flying to Venice in the morning :dance:[/QUOTE]
You should get in contact with Philip Bloom! He's somewhere over there too
[QUOTE=double D;42013639]You should get in contact with Philip Bloom! He's somewhere over there too[/QUOTE]
philip bloom is overrated
who?
[QUOTE=bopie;42015341]who?[/QUOTE]
Cinema dude whose opinions are worshipped and taken as objective facts on dpreview and such
does anyone know what's causing my camera to make these weird colorful pixels when I try to to very long exposures?
for example:
[img]http://i.imgur.com/Sk6q2kS.jpg[/img]
although it looks very cool, I was trying to simply get this but with trails:
[img]http://i.imgur.com/WecNXIk.jpg[/img]
[editline]30th August 2013[/editline]
or here's another example:
[img]http://i.imgur.com/AahuTQJ.jpg[/img]
if you look closely, you can see all these weird colorful pixels:
[img]http://i.imgur.com/xfcDEIQ.jpg[/img]
[editline]30th August 2013[/editline]
(im not talking about the red tint to the first image, im guessing that's because the car drove by)
[editline]30th August 2013[/editline]
(im talking about the "flecks" in the image that look like stars except they aren't because they don't move)
[editline]30th August 2013[/editline]
all of these were shot with iso 100
toxic flourine that has been put into the water supply and evaporated into flourine solution vapour in the air
