[QUOTE=Killuah;43149303]Just got my confirmation email, I will be traveling the North Sea with this baby in January/February:
[img]http://www.nordmeerforscher.de/cms/uploads/tx_pknordlex/lightbox/2006-01-23_ALKOR_IFM-GEOMAR_klein.jpg[/img][/QUOTE]
what kind of science are you doing in the north sea?
[QUOTE=Killuah;43149303]Just got my confirmation email, I will be traveling the North Sea with this baby in January/February:
[img]http://www.nordmeerforscher.de/cms/uploads/tx_pknordlex/lightbox/2006-01-23_ALKOR_IFM-GEOMAR_klein.jpg[/img][/QUOTE]
Honeymoon?
and im over here shooting some c200 fuji film thing
nothing wrong with fuci c200 man, is my backup film when i cant get any agfa in
[IMG]http://i.imgur.com/dtQ00fV.jpg[/IMG]
[QUOTE=notlabbet;43150298]Whats the occasion?[/QUOTE]
Mainly dumpin Ocean Bottom Seismometers for a project my university takes part in, it's about the ramming noise from the buildin of windparks and if and how it can be used to quantify its impact on animals, how far it reaches and how good of an artificial source it is so we can use it to do seismic measurements.
[QUOTE=Killuah;43151588]Mainly dumpin Ocean Bottom Seismometers for a project my university takes part in, it's about the ramming noise from the buildin of windparks and if and how it can be used to quantify its impact on animals, how far it reaches and how good of an artificial source it is so we can use it to do seismic measurements.[/QUOTE]
That's fucking awesome. I'm sure it's pointless to tell you to bring a camera, that sounds like one of the most awesome photo opportunities ever.
[QUOTE=Roll_Program;43151508][IMG]http://i.imgur.com/dtQ00fV.jpg[/IMG][/QUOTE]
I don't get it
has the joke not been [I]exposed[/I] to you yet?
he exposed the paper
[editline]11th December 2013[/editline]
shinobi'd
[QUOTE=FlippR;43154956]he exposed the paper
[editline]11th December 2013[/editline]
shinobi'd[/QUOTE]
I know nothing about photo paper sorry ;(
[QUOTE=Trogdon;43155181]I know nothing about photo paper sorry ;([/QUOTE]
Well you probably understand it by now, but that sort of photo paper is light sensitive just as film is.
You project the negatives onto the paper to create sort of an "analogue" enlarged copy.
After the negative has been projected for some seconds (varies from picture to picture and other settings but let's say 9 seconds), the paper has to be developed in chemicals simliar to what the film itself uses.
So opening a sealed bag of it in a lit room (which has plenty of warnings telling you not to) basically ruins all of the paper.
hey, at least its from a smoke and pet free house
[QUOTE=notlabbet;43154834]That's fucking awesome. I'm sure it's pointless to tell you to bring a camera, that sounds like one of the most awesome photo opportunities ever.[/QUOTE]
I'm very eager and curious about how the crew will react and how I can crunch it in between work times, we work shifts.
this is actually one my of most fav photographs ever:
[img]http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lhlfywdgWa1qzo2mlo1_500.jpg[/img]
idk why
i wish we had vertical screens
and vertical cinema
[QUOTE=Eltro102;43159467]this is actually one my of most fav photographs ever:
[img]http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lhlfywdgWa1qzo2mlo1_500.jpg[/img]
idk why
i wish we had vertical screens
and vertical cinema[/QUOTE]
embrace the verticals
how my fotostream looks like
[IMG]http://farm3.staticflickr.com/2859/11341239925_8d7332ccb4_o.png[/IMG]
how artistic all those photos perfectly encapsulate the feeling of how fuckin foggy it is
left - in photoshop, right - after saved as .jpg and opened
[IMG]http://i.imgur.com/aBgaBXb.jpg?1[/IMG]
can anyone explain why the colors aren't the same? this is not cool
what colour space were you working with in photoshop
rgb/8
[editline]12th December 2013[/editline]
if that's what you mean
[editline]12th December 2013[/editline]
when opened in windows photo viewer - normal
irfanview - muted
uploaded to flickr - normal
uploaded to cargo - muted
idk how the colourspaces work but if working in ps i open and save the jpg in lr and never get the colour space issue
[QUOTE=The Salmon;43162521]idk how the colourspaces work but if working in ps i open and save the jpg in lr and never get the colour space issue[/QUOTE]
nice. it worked
[QUOTE=FlippR;43162579]nice. it worked[/QUOTE]
Clumsy workaround.
So it looks like your camera/scanner is saving in AdobeRGB or not assigning a colour space at all, photoshop is showing the colour as one of its own funky spaces and that other viewer is showing the colour as if it's sRGB.
Try going to edit > assign to profile and making it AdobeRGB then opening it in a viewer which recognises AdobeRGB and see if it looks the same.
If that fails, what will work is going to edit > convert to profile and choose sRGB and check the use absolute colorimetric intent.
[QUOTE=Roll_Program;43162722]Clumsy workaround.
So it looks like your camera/scanner is saving in AdobeRGB or not assigning a colour space at all, photoshop is showing the colour as one of its own funky spaces and that other viewer is showing the colour as if it's sRGB.
Try going to edit > assign to profile and making it AdobeRGB then opening it in a viewer which recognises AdobeRGB and see if it looks the same.
If that fails, what will work is going to edit > convert to profile and choose sRGB and check the use absolute colorimetric intent.[/QUOTE]
second one worked. thanks
or you could just throw colour management out the window and simply make sure that proof colours is disabled, then do your editing, and uncheck "embed colour profile" when saving as a jpeg :v:
[editline]12th December 2013[/editline]
works fine as long as your photo lives on the internet
it's because adobe rgb has a larger colour space but isn't implemented as well or widely enough to really take advantage of it so it gets shunted to sRGB which messes with the colours a bit
[editline]12th December 2013[/editline]
morale of the story : shoot/save in sRGB or raw
If you shoot in raw, the colour space settings you set in camera are still saved in the EXIF data and PS/LR/ACR will convert the raw to that colour space when you save it, so you still need to do that thing where you convert to sRGB if you want to save as jpg or show off your picture on the internets.
raw uses it's own colour space which is wider than both, saving in it allows u more choice + lr (and ps i guess too??) defaults to sRGB when u export
Ah.
Mine defaulted to AdobeRGB and it caused me a lot of problems originally, when I didn't know much about colour spaces.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
