Ask us more about the forums: READ THE OP or get BANNED. Yes, search is currently disabled for blue
10,008 replies, posted
[QUOTE=Simski;35742022]How about making a "no puns allowed past page 1" rule?
That way if the thread has real discussion potential, then every page past the first one can be expected to be serious discussion.[/QUOTE]
Who was actually complaining about the puns, from what I got most people enjoyed the puns as long as they were appropriate.
[editline]28th April 2012[/editline]
[QUOTE=l l;35742151]to be honest if anything it should be no puns allowed before page 3
if you read an interesting thread about some stuff you can heavily discuss and see someone ruin it with a bad pun it just kinda kills it, I don't think they should be allowed at all though[/QUOTE]
How do puns ruin it? Whenever I see a really bad pun I just rate dumb, move on and forget about it.
[QUOTE=l l;35742151]to be honest if anything it should be no puns allowed before page 3
if you read an interesting thread about some stuff you can heavily discuss and see someone ruin it with a bad pun it just kinda kills it, I don't think they should be allowed at all though[/QUOTE]
If you only allow them past page 3, then that will just mean that any serious threads managing to actually get past page 3 will then be raped by the people who realizes that this is one of the threads where they are now allowed to express themselves.
If it's a thread worthy of discussion, it will go past page 1. If it isn't, then I don't see why it can't serve as a joke.
I personally have never experienced bad puns as anything but something you rate dumb and move on with though, so I don't really see your problem here.
Bring back the puns.
[QUOTE=lavacano;35739613]
see that would just mean the moderators have to spend all that extra time banning people for making those shit threads in GD or whatever. Garry made Fast Threads for a reason - while most to all of those threads should really be gone, it saves a lot of time to instead just clump them together in a shitpost central and leave them be. And time is money when you're moderating a forum the size of Facepunch.[/QUOTE]
Can people stop saying this already? Make a shit thread in GD, bam, you're fucking banned. If that means that lots of retards will be banned, so be it.
I once heard that imgur.com is run by some Redditor, so that's probably why it blocks Facepunch.
[QUOTE=Overv;35742751]I once heard that imgur.com is run by some Redditor, so that's probably why it blocks Facepunch.[/QUOTE]all the imgur images work fine for me...
[QUOTE=Overv;35742751]I once heard that imgur.com is run by some Redditor, so that's probably why it blocks Facepunch.[/QUOTE]
In my case they don't load at first, but once I get the url and put them on other window they load perfectly, and show up on the forum after a while with no problems. It could be there's a bit of a "cooldown" when they're first uploaded now
Why can't we just have some simple fun in the SH? There were plenty of serious discussions going on in the times when puns were still allowed, it's not like allowing puns will lead to constant pun-streams in every thread, at least not long-term.
Remember when you allowed the Austin Powers picture? After it was allowed, I still didn't see it getting used much at all.
[QUOTE=Simski;35742022]How about making a "no puns allowed past page 1" rule?
That way if the thread has real discussion potential, then every page past the first one can be expected to be serious discussion.[/QUOTE]
how about the mods ban shitty posters and you stop crying about it because you can't get your way
dragon can you go all the way and ban shitty threads as well? like the moonwalking thread and basically every thread that shian makes
[QUOTE=UnknownDude;35742799]Why can't we just have some simple fun in the SH? There were plenty of serious discussions going on in the times when puns were still allowed, it's not like allowing puns will lead to constant pun-streams in every thread, at least not long-term.
Remember when you aloowed the Austin Powers picture? After it was allowed, I still didn't see it getting used much at all.[/QUOTE]
actually after the austin powers picture was banned I never saw it again.
[QUOTE=PrusseluskenV2;35742823]why are you using the word legalise? this isn't a debate about laws, it's about preventing people from derailing threads in miserable attempts to get some small icons beneath their post[/QUOTE]
Fine, I'll change it to "allow".
I've rarely seen a pun completely derailing a thread. In most cases, only the first page would have puns.
[QUOTE=Jorori;35742796]In my case they don't load at first, but once I get the url and put them on other window they load perfectly, and show up on the forum after a while with no problems. It could be there's a bit of a "cooldown" when they're first uploaded now[/QUOTE]
No, by opening a new window or tab and pasting the URL your browser doesn't know where you got that link from so it won't send a referer like "facepunch.com". As soon as you've opened the image, it is cached by your browser and it will be loaded from file instead of from imgur.com when you next see the image on Facepunch, which is why it won't be blocked anymore.
My new avatar isn't wanting to update for me in chrome.
Cleared the cache a couple times and everything.
Any ideas?
Can I seriously ask what moron thought it'd be a good idea to ban for puns?
"Oh man they're making (bad) jokes, lets ban humor!"
Why won't my avatar change even one I press CTRl+F5?
Try removing all your browser cookies via CCleaner
[QUOTE=Overv;35742911]No, by opening a new window or tab and pasting the URL your browser doesn't know where you got that link from so it won't send a referer like "facepunch.com". As soon as you've opened the image, it is cached by your browser and it will be loaded from file instead of from imgur.com when you next see the image on Facepunch, which is why it won't be blocked anymore.[/QUOTE]
Makes sense, though I'm not sure about the "banning FP out of spite" thing. Isn't there a way to find out?
[QUOTE=Rapist;35742945]Can I seriously ask what moron thought it'd be a good idea to ban for puns?
"Oh man they're making (bad) jokes, lets ban humor!"[/QUOTE]
I agree. Everyone has their own sense of humor. Humor is something that should be embraced, bad or not.
[QUOTE=UnknownDude;35742853]Fine, I'll change it to "allow".
I've rarely seen a pun completely derailing a thread. In most cases, only the first page would have puns.[/QUOTE]
It wasn't about them derailing, there was a ton of them made mostly to farm ratings and they were usually terrible and had no place in a forum about discussing the news. It's not likely to change because most users have no self restraint when it comes to the matter. Mods have made it clear the rules here to stay so there's no reason to continue trying to argue for it's "legalization".
[QUOTE=Jorori;35742976]Try removing all your browser cookies via CCleaner
Makes sense, though I'm not sure about the "banning FP out of spite" thing. Isn't there a way to find out?[/QUOTE]
I'm not paying $40 for it
xD Thanks for answering
I would love to have those!
Oh well...
[QUOTE=Griffster26;35743017]I'm not paying $40 for it[/QUOTE]
it's free.
[QUOTE=Jorori;35742976]Try removing all your browser cookies via CCleaner[/QUOTE]
Or just use [ctrl]+[shift]+[del]?
[img]http://img844.imageshack.us/img844/7630/20120428074606.png[/img]
works for firefox too:
[img]http://img546.imageshack.us/img546/3378/20120428074735.png[/img]
[QUOTE=Rapist;35742945]Can I seriously ask what moron thought it'd be a good idea to ban for puns?
"Oh man they're making (bad) jokes, lets ban humor!"[/QUOTE]
Threads were getting spammed to high hell because of people trying to mass gather funnies with shit puns. Banning is the main form of deterrent and control the mod team has.
so if they want this to stop, it becomes bannable. There's nothing personal in a ban, and saying that they've "banned humour" is just blatant exaggeration
[QUOTE=Griffster26;35743017]I'm not paying $40 for it[/QUOTE]
There's a free version as far as I know
[QUOTE=Sanius;35742838]how about the mods ban shitty posters and you stop crying about it because you can't get your way
dragon can you go all the way and ban shitty threads as well? like the moonwalking thread and basically every thread that shian makes[/QUOTE]
By shitty posters you mean posters you don't like don't you.
[QUOTE=Griffster26;35742969]Why won't my avatar change even one I press CTRl+F5?[/QUOTE]
Same issue as me, in your profile it shows what your avatar should be but not in post.
[QUOTE=carcarcargo;35743073]By shitty posters you mean posters you don't like don't you.[/QUOTE]
evil misogynists
[QUOTE=Dragon;35740896]PUNS and JOKES are OFF TOPIC so STOP DOING THEM
jesus[/QUOTE]If you want to keep things on topic, why aren't there bans for those who post things that have to do with religion, (or anything else that has to do with furthering one's own agenda), in threads that have nothing to do with such a thing.
I mean yeah, the puns were shit, but banning puns to keep a thread on topic while not banning any other deviations is very arbitrary.
[QUOTE=carcarcargo;35743073]By shitty posters you mean posters you don't like don't you.[/QUOTE]
no I mean people who wouldn't survive for a day in this site had TH89 not stepped down
in other words people who would be better off circlejerking in reddit and 4chan
[QUOTE=ExplodingGuy;35743109]If you want to keep things on topic, why aren't there bans for those who post things that have to do with religion, (or anything else that has to do with furthering one's own agenda), in threads that have nothing to do with such a thing.
I mean yeah, the puns were shit, but banning puns to keep a thread on topic while not banning any other deviations is very arbitrary.[/QUOTE]
Uh I'm not sure what you mean. If someone suddenly says "fuck religion" in an unrelated thread about bananas, they'll be banned.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.