Ask us more about the forums: READ THE OP or get BANNED. Yes, search is currently disabled for blue - General

[QUOTE=Kai-ryuu;36075335]why is gunfox even a mod he sucks.[/QUOTE] thats a dick thing to say, why not post some reasons why.

Are threads autolocking at 10,000 posts again or something?

Hey if you got a problem with a moderator and have [U]actual evidence[/U] to support your claim, especially something like abuse, PM/contact garry. posting about it here wont do you much good. [QUOTE=Kai-ryuu;36075335]why is gunfox even a mod he sucks.[/QUOTE] Posts like these are not helping!

It's like when the people wanted Benji demodded, people were just shouting and complaining that he should get demodded. It wasn't until we actually acted with manners and brought up evidence that garry took action.

a while ago i try'ed to PM the gazmaster but i think he disabled pms or something

[QUOTE=superstepa;36074049]Try Ctrl+f5 shift+f5 manual cache wiping using facepunch.com instead of [url]www.facepunch.com[/url][/QUOTE] Funny how we have to say this on every page, sometimes even twice.

[QUOTE=eternalflamez;36076486]Funny how we have to say this on every page, sometimes even twice.[/QUOTE] The www. removal needs to be added to OP imo

Why is www just not redirected? It doesn't work properly with cloudflare anyway.

[QUOTE=The Baconator;36075340]how come Ryu-Gi got unbanned?[/QUOTE] Because I'm the best moderator ever and like to give every human being a second chance to post in this wonderful virtual discussions forum.

swebonny is an inspiration to us all

The mikfoz account still posts occasionally [url]http://www.facepunch.com/threads/1177486?p=35594431&viewfull=1#post35594431[/url]

I've always had a soft spot for Crappy-'sket :D

I boostar'd GM a while back and my avatar refuses to move. [IMG]http://puu.sh/wuv9.gif[/IMG] 80X80, below the size requirement, ect. ect.

[QUOTE=Birdman101;36079551]I boostar'd GM a while back and my avatar refuses to move. [IMG]http://puu.sh/wuv9.gif[/IMG] 80X80, below the size requirement, ect. ect.[/QUOTE] it's because you bought gold.

[QUOTE=Birdman101;36079551]I boostar'd GM a while back and my avatar refuses to move. [IMG]http://puu.sh/wuv9.gif[/IMG] 80X80, below the size requirement, ect. ect.[/QUOTE] It's 81x81.

[QUOTE=Jo The Shmo;36073988]there was also that time he banned someone in the rc chat thread for disagreeing with one of his other bans[/QUOTE] [url]http://www.facepunch.com/threads/1038588?p=29550124&viewfull=1#post29550124[/url]

[QUOTE=Zarjk;36079577]it's because you bought gold.[/QUOTE] Wierd how this thread turned from asking questions and getting answered to people trying to make bad jokes

[QUOTE=horsedrowner;36079607]It's 81x81.[/QUOTE] oh, SONOFABITCH

[URL="http://facepunch.com/threads/1186231?p=36082729&viewfull=1#post36082729"]http://facepunch.com/threads/1186231?p=36082729&viewfull=1#post36082729[/URL] Can Starpluck add to the rules that images apparently aren't allowed in Sensationalist Headline OP's?

[QUOTE=Hidole555;36084256][URL="http://facepunch.com/threads/1186231?p=36082729&viewfull=1#post36082729"]http://facepunch.com/threads/1186231?p=36082729&viewfull=1#post36082729[/URL] Can Starpluck add to the rules that images apparently aren't allowed in Sensationalist Headline OP's?[/QUOTE] i'm pretty sure the point he's making is that you should be keeping your OP's a bit more simple shian or something made a really well formatted SH OP with one image and a nicely formatted excerpt from the article and nobody minded, when you just copy and paste an entire article and shove images in at random it just looks messy and nobody wants to bother reading your thread [editline]24th May 2012[/editline] [url]http://facepunch.com/threads/1185989[/url] something like this i would imagine is ok

[QUOTE=Hidole555;36084256][URL]http://facepunch.com/threads/1186231?p=36082729&viewfull=1#post36082729[/URL] Can Starpluck add to the rules that images apparently aren't allowed in Sensationalist Headline OP's?[/QUOTE] It should be formatted as a 'head here for more information' text. A quick summary, or the first few paragraphs, then maybe the headline picture from the article THEN you link it. Make sure the text is inside quote tags, too.

Well, I tried to make the article look as close to the original as possible. Keeping bold text and hyperlinks and if you compare the two the images come in at about the same spot. And wouldn't that formatting make the OP stretch even longer? On my 1920 x 1080 monitor that cuts the amount of screen taken up in half. [editline]24th May 2012[/editline] [QUOTE=FlubberNugget;36084454]It should be formatted as a 'head here for more information' text. A quick summary, or the first few paragraphs, then maybe the headline picture from the article THEN you link it.[/QUOTE] Alright. But if that's what people want in the first place it should really be made more clear in the rules.

[QUOTE=Hidole555;36084459]Well, I tried to make the article look as close to the original as possible. Keeping bold text and hyperlinks and if you compare the two the images come in at about the same spot. And wouldn't that formatting make the OP stretch even longer? On my 1920 x 1080 monitor that cuts the amount of screen taken up in half. [editline]24th May 2012[/editline] Alright. But if that's what people want in the first place it should really be made more clear in the rules.[/QUOTE] Learn to use common sense a bit more (not trying to be offensive there), read other threads and look for examples on how others post and learn from there.

[QUOTE=Hidole555;36084459]Well, I tried to make the article look as close to the original as possible. Keeping bold text and hyperlinks and if you compare the two the images come in at about the same spot. And wouldn't that formatting make the OP stretch even longer? On my 1920 x 1080 monitor that cuts the amount of screen taken up in half. [editline]24th May 2012[/editline] Alright. But if that's what people want in the first place it should really be made more clear in the rules.[/QUOTE] Examine the size of the text in the quote compared to your post Getting the post to mimic the article isn't always good. This is a forum, not the BBC

[QUOTE=Hidole555;36084459] Alright. But if that's what people want in the first place it should really be made more clear in the rules.[/QUOTE] [quote]Most rules are common sense and it would therefore be impossible to list all the things you could to to get yourself banned.[/quote] seems pretty clear

we're back

Now to find out what caused the outage.

[QUOTE=Drsalvador;36085011]we're back[/QUOTE]thanks for telling me, i wouldnt have known otherwise

Probably sethhackers seeing as the source code got leaked [url]http://facepunch.com/threads/1186235[/url] has that happened before?

[QUOTE=fruxodaily;36085065]Probably sethhackers seeing as the source code got leaked [url]http://facepunch.com/threads/1186235[/url] has that happened before?[/QUOTE] Considering the last time Facepunch was majorly DDoS'd (mass seth hack banning) that seems very likely.