• Ask us more about the forums: READ THE OP or get BANNED. Yes, search is currently disabled for blue
    10,008 replies, posted
send letters of appeal to garry disabling all avatars
[QUOTE=ihatecompvir;37223482]Testing this.[/QUOTE] [IMG]http://puu.sh/V6lc[/IMG] this is getting out of hand, are no mods going to say whether it's allowed or not
Let's see what this turns into. [editline]~~[/editline] Ooooh Neat. Now all that remains to know is "how against the rules is this and should I change back"
What's going on holy shit.
[QUOTE=NomadicNinja;37223542]send letters of appeal to garry disabling all avatars[/QUOTE] Gary should disable all avatars and make people pay 1 dollar for it. $2 for a gif.
This shit is amazing
Can't you just ban people for this? They're deliberately being a pain in the ass.
[QUOTE=ROFLBURGER;37223690]Can't you just ban people for this? They're deliberately being a pain in the ass.[/QUOTE] Frankly I don't see how it's much more different than people having over-sized titles. I'll change back anyway. I don't want the risk.
PM us page stretchers tia
I want a big avatar...
[QUOTE=ROFLBURGER;37223690]Can't you just ban people for this? They're deliberately being a pain in the ass.[/QUOTE] What are you talking about? The slightly bigger avatars isn't ruining anything. It's not like they change the quality of the forum posts.
It has the potential to be abused though. It should be fixed as soon as possible.
thank god facepunch's servers are notoriously robust or else everyone uploading huge unoptimized avatars might have some sort of negative consequence
[QUOTE=FoxMeister;37223788]thank god facepunch's servers are notoriously robust or else everyone uploading huge unoptimized avatars might have some sort of negative consequence[/QUOTE] the file size limit is still in place i think
This should only be fixed and banned when people actually abuse it, not when there's mild suspicions that someone, somewhere, in the future, MIGHT abuse it. And even then, it's practically the same as having a big title.
[QUOTE=TurtleeyFP;37223834]This should only be fixed and banned when people actually abuse it, not when there's mild suspicions that someone, somewhere, in the future, MIGHT abuse it. And even then, it's practically the same as having a big title.[/QUOTE] Um we've already had a few people use it for page stretching, it's already been abused sooo yeah. And considering you can stretch it waaaay further than with a title, and without paying or waiting, I wouldn't really call it the same thing.
what about ones like supersnail's? its not page stretching but its still huge
[QUOTE=TurtleeyFP;37223834]This should only be fixed and banned when people actually abuse it, not when there's mild suspicions that someone, somewhere, in the future, MIGHT abuse it. And even then, it's practically the same as having a big title.[/QUOTE] If it was allowed in the first place there wouldn't be an avatar pixel size limit or garry would charge dosh for it.
Big page stretching avatars + Big page stretching titles = disaster
Testing [editline]13th August 2012[/editline] Holy shit it works Can I keep it?
[QUOTE=eagleeye64000;37224029]Testing [editline]13th August 2012[/editline] Holy shit it works Can I keep it?[/QUOTE] It's like a puppy and all you want to do is keep it and pet it and love it but your parents say "no son the servers won't like it" and they ban you
[QUOTE=Derp Y. Mail;37224106]"no son the servers won't like it"[/QUOTE] it's 8.76kb, well within the limit
[QUOTE=Dori;37224124]it's 8.76kb, well within the limit[/QUOTE] Parents aren't always reasonable. [editline]14th August 2012[/editline] :(
If anyone has a problem with my avatar being too big feel free to tell me :c
I don't see the problem with having a big avatar unless it's really annoying (too big or stupid content like flashing lights).
In my opinion it should be allowed at sensible sizes, but that's far too hard to enforce in the first place. I get the feeling people are going to get banned regardless of how sensible the size is. [editline]14th August 2012[/editline] [QUOTE=supersnail11;37224163]If anyone has a problem with my avatar being too big feel free to tell me :c[/QUOTE] Yours is fine, but I don't like the idea of EVERY goldmember having this. Imagine an entire page of GMs with huge avatars posting.
[QUOTE=postal;37223882]Um we've already had a few people use it for page stretching, it's already been abused sooo yeah. And considering you can stretch it waaaay further than with a title, and without paying or waiting, I wouldn't really call it the same thing.[/QUOTE] Why not ban people that abuse it and pagestretch instead of banning everyone ever from it? Also, I've never seen anyone banned for a pagestretching title. Is that because they gave money, or because someone else bought them the title?
To be honest, I'm waiting until Garry comes in to give his opinion on this. I don't want to change my avatar to something like 110x110 and find out the next day that I'm perma'd.
increase the maximum dimensions for golds to 120x200 and make gold $10. problem solved
[QUOTE=DireAvenger;37224188]Yours is fine, but I don't like the idea of EVERY goldmember having this. Imagine an entire page of GMs with huge avatars posting.[/QUOTE] This. I can see gold members getting huge avatars as a privilege or something. Or else everyone will have one, then we have long pages of 5 word posts.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.