Ask us more about the forums: READ THE OP or get BANNED. Yes, search is currently disabled for blue
10,008 replies, posted
[QUOTE=TurtleeyFP;37224209]Why not ban people that abuse it and pagestretch instead of banning everyone ever from it? Also, I've never seen anyone banned for a pagestretching title. Is that because they gave money, or because someone else bought them the title?[/QUOTE]
Probably because there's a limit for a reason and there's no point of having it if people are going to have avatars bigger then the limit. If that makes any sense..
[QUOTE=TurtleeyFP;37224209]Why not ban people that abuse it and pagestretch instead of banning everyone ever from it? Also, I've never seen anyone banned for a pagestretching title. Is that because they gave money, or because someone else bought them the title?[/QUOTE]
Unfortunately, I think banning gifs would be the only other option besides banning those who abuse it. The only way to verify that the header is telling the truth is to read the entire image file, and I don't think that's something garry wants to rape his CPU with.
[QUOTE=Dori;37224235]increase the maximum dimensions for golds to 125x500 and make gold $10. problem solved[/QUOTE]
no
supersnail size'd is perfect.
give blues 80x80 back
[QUOTE=TurtleeyFP;37224209]Why not ban people that abuse it and pagestretch instead of banning everyone ever from it?[/quote]Maybe because we don't want everyone interested in spamming/trolling the forums doing this to an extreme degree??? Size restrictions are what they are for a reason.
[quote]Also, I've never seen anyone banned for a pagestretching title. Is that because they gave money, or because someone else bought them the title?[/QUOTE]
Well obviously I wouldn't ban someone for receiving a massive title, but the titles get adjusted eventually anyways. I don't get why you're comparing the two anyways. Anyone can do this instantly, it's not the same thing.
[editline]13th August 2012[/editline]
[QUOTE=DireAvenger;37224232]To be honest, I'm waiting until Garry comes in to give his opinion on this. I don't want to change my avatar to something like 110x110 and find out the next day that I'm perma'd.[/QUOTE]
smart
[QUOTE=LordCrypto;37224266]no
supersnail size'd is perfect.
give blues 80x80 back[/QUOTE]
I'd honestly prefer if something was added to the Boostar to pay for a supersnail sized avatar. If every goldmember was capable of having avatars of that size from the get-go, we'd have a big fucking problem (no pun intended).
[QUOTE=LordCrypto;37224266]no
supersnail size'd is perfect. [/QUOTE]
that's what I meant. I guessed the size of his avatar incorrectly
120x200 (3:5) or 125x250 (1:2)
supersnail yes
this, no
[img]http://puu.sh/V6lc[/img]
Is garry going to remove avatars again?
Hell, are people going to get banned for this?
[QUOTE=Liem;37224328]Is garry going to remove avatars again?
Hell, are people going to get banned for this?[/QUOTE]
I'd say maybe, and yes.
a supersnail avatar adds more or less 100 pixels to a one line post.
at that size, i'd say that's the largest a regular member is going to get
since everyone wants an increased post size i request sigs be enabled
it's gonna end up like hasselhoff
everyone who did it before it gets disabled gets to keep it
unfortunately garry probably won't ban
Too big?
-just in case fuck that-
Just tell me if I must change it.
[QUOTE=Liem;37224435]Too big?[/QUOTE]
Good size, looks like ass.
My friend wrote a Python script to remove avatar size limits, thought you guys might appreciate it
[quote]11:19 PM - Turtle [CPU Cool]: *link removed*
11:20 PM - Turtle [CPU Cool]: usage: infgif_poc.py -f input.gif
11:20 PM - Turtle [CPU Cool]: or just run it and it will prompt you for filename[/quote]
[editline]11:49PM[/editline]
rehosted on MediaFire
*link removed*
[editline]3:53AM[/editline]
[b]THIS IS NOW A PERMABANNABLE OFFENSE[/b]
In my opinion of the avatar sizes, on a 1440x900 screen, you should be able to fit one LARGE avatar (like Liem's) and one normal avatar (mine) on a maximised chrome window. That way you can read both posts at the same time as well as seeing the entirety of both posts and their borders.
[QUOTE=Liem;37224435]Too big?[/QUOTE]
avatars get cut off width-wise at 120px. a height of 250px stretches out posts too much imo. if garry were to change the maximum dimensions, I think 120x200 would be best
[QUOTE=Dori;37224537]avatars get cut off width-wise at 120px. a height of 250px stretches out posts too much imo. if garry were to change the maximum dimensions, I think 120x200 would be best[/QUOTE]
And Blues will get the 80x80 limit back. Seems like a good idea to me.
Yeah here's an idea
[code]
div#userdata a img
{
max-width:200px;
max-height:120px;
}
[/code]
you could even just put this in a userscript and fix any page stretchers anyways.
Shrunk it a bit, and changed it.
Can a mod please respond, is this going to be Banable?
[QUOTE=Liem;37224328]Is garry going to remove avatars again?
Hell, are people going to get banned for this?[/QUOTE]
If you don't want to be banned, don't change your avatar.
Better safe than sorry.
[QUOTE=C0linSSX;37224493]My friend wrote a Python script to remove avatar size limits, thought you guys might appreciate it
[editline]11:49PM[/editline]
rehosted on MediaFire
[url]http://www.mediafire.com/?r1krztgascucerg[/url][/QUOTE]
I installed Python and tried launching that, but a cmd window just comes up for a half a second with "SyntaxError: invalid syntax" in it. :(
This is probably going to end very badly.
or it could end very happily and garry gives us everything we want
[editline]14th August 2012[/editline]
yeah this is going to be hilarious
Cool people keep their avatars.
[QUOTE=Furnost;37224685]I installed Python and tried launching that, but a cmd window just comes up for a half a second with "SyntaxError: invalid syntax" in it. :([/QUOTE]
You probably have a different version of python
[editline]asd[/editline]
Yeah, it's python 2.7 syntax
[QUOTE=Greenen72;37224743]You probably have a different version of python[/QUOTE]
It's the latest one I got off of their site, I think.
[img]http://puu.sh/V7FB[/img]
Hai :v:
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.