• Ask us more about the forums: READ THE OP or get BANNED. Yes, search is currently disabled for blue
    10,008 replies, posted
[QUOTE=-n3o-;35186619]It was mainly just full of porn anyway, it was a odd and interesting section.[/QUOTE] i disagree, most of the shit from the section came from the Post Something About Your Day thread.
[QUOTE=mechanarchy;35186623]I think it's an issue with chrome and Facepunch. I'm not sure exactly what causes it - I'm using Firefox and never seem to have these issues, yet your point about the resource usage for FP tabs in chrome has been raised by other users in this thread about 3 or 4 times so I don't think it's an isolated incident any more.[/QUOTE] There's clearly something going wrong when one facepunch tab in chrome is using 4 times more memory than firefox in total, which has 5 facepunch tabs open and the buttload of addons I have.
PSAYD was the most active thread, but the majority of the front page was porn threads lol.. Also that god awful Bump Every Time You Orgasm thread, Hope whoever made that shit got perma'd, was worse than FT
[QUOTE=ultradude25;35186780]There's clearly something going wrong when one facepunch tab in chrome is using 4 times more memory than firefox in total, which has 5 facepunch tabs open and the buttload of addons I have.[/QUOTE] Yeah. But, like I said, I use firefox like you do so I've got no idea what's going on. Right now I'm sitting on 16 tabs and 1.3GB RAM used for firefox. Only one facepunch tab though. But firefox is single-process so it's probably still caching stuff from facepunch threads I've opened and closed earlier today.
I left the ticker on overnight once Came back to find Facepunch eating 1.6 GB of RAM, Chrome slowed to a crawl :v:
[QUOTE=-n3o-;35186619]It was mainly just full of porn anyway, [/QUOTE] i miss the furry section
Facepunch makes my Chrome crash all the time. I'm considering moving back to Firefox.
[QUOTE=SinineSiil;35189480]Facepunch makes my Chrome crash all the time. I'm considering moving back to Firefox.[/QUOTE] or fix your computer
No, it actually eats alot of ram, yesterday it was like 1GB of ram, on just one of the processes, and 25% of my CPU usage, which both are alot more than me playing LoL right now. I would think a website would require less than a game...
[QUOTE=SinineSiil;35189480]Facepunch makes my Chrome crash all the time. I'm considering moving back to Firefox.[/QUOTE] I think clearing you cache might help?
It's definitely Facepunch causing the leak.
I'm getting the same thing but I haven't noticed any other site do it.
I'm not getting that kind of memory usage on FP with Chrome.
[QUOTE=TehWhale;35190688]It's definitely Facepunch causing the leak.[/QUOTE] Garry is grabbing/storing the mouse's current position every time you move it, for the sole purpose of finding where you clicked when opening a div or something like that. It would make more sense to grab the mouse's position solely when it's needed (inside of the function) rather than calling it every frame. [img]http://i.imgur.com/cYEWL.png[/img] [url]http://facepunch.com/fp/js/Facepunch/fp.js[/url] There is probably a few other areas where the javascript could be optimized, but i'm not about to sit here looking through all of that code. (I'm getting a memory leak of about 4K every 2 seconds)
GOTTA LOVE GARRY'S CODING
[QUOTE=HeroicPillow;35192000]Garry is grabbing/storing the mouse's current position every time you move it, for the sole purpose of finding where you clicked when opening a div or something like that. It would make more sense to grab the mouse's position solely when it's needed (inside of the function) rather than calling it every frame. [img]http://i.imgur.com/cYEWL.png[/img] [url]http://facepunch.com/fp/js/Facepunch/fp.js[/url] There is probably a few other areas where the javascript could be optimized, but i'm not about to sit here looking through all of that code. (I'm getting a memory leak of about 4K every 2 seconds)[/QUOTE] Why.
[QUOTE=TehWhale;35192114]GOTTA LOVE GARRY'S CODING[/QUOTE] for all we know it could've been compwhizzi that coded that particular file. Regardless it's not too big of a deal. The forum still works.
I don't get how that would only cause high memory usage on chrome.
[QUOTE=HeroicPillow;35192221]for all we know it could've been compwhizzi that coded that particular file. Regardless it's not too big of a deal. The forum still works.[/QUOTE] Compwhizzi is haunting us with memory leaks from the grave :tinfoil:
The mouse function has been like that for years
[QUOTE=HeroicPillow;35192221]for all we know it could've been compwhizzi that coded that particular file. Regardless it's not too big of a deal. The forum still works.[/QUOTE] Compwhizii took that part from the old js file I think
[QUOTE=HeroicPillow;35192000]Garry is grabbing/storing the mouse's current position every time[/QUOTE] He's got two variables, which he keeps updated. It's not like he's keeping those and making new ones every time, this shouldn't be an issue. Plus, as these two guys have said: [QUOTE=ultradude25;35192770]I don't get how that would only cause high memory usage on chrome.[/QUOTE] [QUOTE=CarlBooth;35193690]The mouse function has been like that for years[/QUOTE] It's been this way for as long as I can remember and it's never been an issue for anyone on any browser in the past as far as I'm aware.
[QUOTE=mechanarchy;35196061]He's got two variables, which he keeps updated. It's not like he's keeping those and making new ones every time, this shouldn't be an issue. Plus, as these two guys have said: It's been this way for as long as I can remember and it's never been an issue for anyone on any browser in the past as far as I'm aware.[/QUOTE] I wasn't explicitly stating that the particular section of code I posted was the cause of all of the forum's problems; it was simply an example of what could possibly be contained if somebody looked further into the javascript. The most that section of code would do is cause an excessive amount of CPU usage on low end computers. If you'd like to, you can sift through all of the javascript and look for memory leaks (and subsequently fix them) but the problem itself isn't that big of a deal at the moment. [QUOTE=HeroicPillow;35192000] [...] There is probably a few other areas where the javascript could be optimized, but i'm not about to sit here looking through all of that code. [...] [/QUOTE]
The best optimization in Garry's code is the snowflakes at Christmas.
[QUOTE=HeroicPillow;35196500]I wasn't explicitly stating that the particular section of code I posted was the cause of all of the forum's problems; it was simply an example of what could possibly be contained if somebody looked further into the javascript. The most that section of code would do is cause an excessive amount of CPU usage on low end computers. If you'd like to, you can sift through all of the javascript and look for memory leaks (and subsequently fix them) but the problem itself isn't that big of a deal at the moment.[/QUOTE] Right, you didn't explicitly state it, but the implication was that that was probably a contributing factor to why the forums run so badly in chrome, in terms of memory leaks judging by the final statement in your post. I was correcting you in that it shouldn't be causing a memory leak, so the problem is likely elsewhere.
Woo, been contributing the forums for five years tomorrow! After missing the last gold member auto cutoff by a few months or a few hundred posts the last few times, I'll finally get- [QUOTE=postal;34497205] [b][del]Gold Membership is 5 years and 100 posts[/del][/b] [b]Only way to get GM is through Boostar[/b] [/QUOTE] oh. I'll just go back to models/skins then.
There are too many gold members here anyway. What ever happened to the purple members, were they called respected or something?
[QUOTE=ultra_bright;35197472]There are too many gold members here anyway. What ever happened to the purple members, were they called respected or something?[/QUOTE] I believe they were called respected.
[QUOTE=ultra_bright;35197472]There are too many gold members here anyway. What ever happened to the purple members, were they called respected or something?[/QUOTE] stupid07er is the only one i know of, he still has the title but his name is gold now
[QUOTE=NightmareXx;35198506]stupid07er is the only one i know of, he still has the title but his name is gold now[/QUOTE] Maurice was one but Jimbo bought him a title and erased it from history
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.