• Facepunch Collaborative V
    428 replies, posted
[QUOTE=hikula;31309475]There is literally no subbass at all in this track. The bassline is thin, boring and annoying, the snare is too high in the mix and doesn't have that punch that snares normally have in Dubstep and there is no melody or anything, just a (boring) bassline, some drums and the ocasional FX. [editline]24th July 2011[/editline] Woops, I just noticed this isn't the Creative Music in Progress thread. Sorry[/QUOTE] There is a subbass... maybe its an octave too far down, I'll fix it up later. What do you mean by the bassline is thin? I'm fixing up the snare at the moment.
It means there's no lows in it, no depth
[QUOTE=Vedicardi;31309134]it doesn't matter [editline]24th July 2011[/editline][/QUOTE] Yeah, but note that this is an eq'd and otherwise transformed sample. Also it's a VERY different case. Free republic was a forum which archived copyrighted news articles. This is jsut a single, altered sound We also need to take in account whether the coyright holders would be bothered to give a shit
it doesn't matter if you alter it heavily. It's illegal. I'm just saying. I don't give a shit if you use it or not.
It's also illegal to take sounds you purchased and to export just the sound and distribute. The reason is obvious and it is because you are making a sound that you'd typically have to purchase free. You have full right to sell songs with the purchased part in it, but you can't sell or distribute parts as they are. Where this applies is usually obvious, if you have a song where a sound is used at one moment all by itself, that would be allowed. Can you use sounds you don't have permission to in your song? No. Will anyone care if you do? Likely not, unless the song is really popular or you are selling/distributing the sound by itself.
[QUOTE=Vedicardi;31309896]it doesn't matter if you alter it heavily. It's illegal. I'm just saying. I don't give a shit if you use it or not.[/QUOTE] I'm pretty sure fair use allows samples to be used if they are taken out of context enough. It's not too fun argumenting over something when the other person declares that they are right and don't actually argue properly for what they are saying
no. it's not legal [editline]24th July 2011[/editline] it's a law. look it up yourself. I already showed you where you were wrong. [editline]24th July 2011[/editline] sampling is illegal, this has been proven. will YOU be prosecuted for it? Unlikely. it is still illegal? yeah I'm just saying its not legal. I didn't say anything else. [editline]24th July 2011[/editline] like this [quote]if you have a song where a sound is used at one moment all by itself, that would be allowed. [/quote] well if you paid royalties for it, yes. [editline]24th July 2011[/editline] my point is you can speculate all you want as to if you "will or won't" be prosecuted, but the matter of the fact is you can be prosecuted. With that in mind you may as well start submitting remixes and cover songs on top of songs with sampling.
We may be able to record something before the deadline. So, sign me up!
I made a track, but I'm a tad unsure on legal issues since I'm using some sampled stuff from the final launch of STS-135. [media]http://soundcloud.com/dicktrace/def[/media] Here's the track itself.
[QUOTE=Dick Tracy;31314431]I made a track, but I'm a tad unsure on legal issues since I'm using some sampled stuff from the final launch of STS-135. [media]http://soundcloud.com/dicktrace/def[/media] Here's the track itself.[/QUOTE] if you got it for free, and you're releasing it for free, it's legal
Got it for free, the launch can be viewed (and downloaded) from nasa. Planning on releasing it for free too, only problem would be that this album might bring in some profit and I'm not too informed on any legal stuff that can arise because of that.
I'd quite like my track on here. [editline]24th July 2011[/editline] [QUOTE] [media]http://soundcloud.com/asylum-voyage/seventeen[/media] [/QUOTE] I'm sorry, I can't mess with sound levels or send it to the appropriate place because I don't have a computer right now. If you could do that OP, I'd be really grateful.
[QUOTE=DudeGuyKT;31318589]I'd quite like my track on here. [editline]24th July 2011[/editline] I'm sorry, I can't mess with sound levels or send it to the appropriate place because I don't have a computer right now. If you could do that OP, I'd be really grateful.[/QUOTE] No problem, I've got you covered.
[QUOTE=Schmoe222;31318769]No problem, I've got you covered.[/QUOTE] Thanks a lot, bro.
[QUOTE=Dick Tracy;31314431]I made a track, but I'm a tad unsure on legal issues since I'm using some sampled stuff from the final launch of STS-135. [media]http://soundcloud.com/dicktrace/def[/media] Here's the track itself.[/QUOTE] open source. no issues here. Pretty much all sample packs grant you usage rights after you buy them, otherwise they would be useless.
I expect JRF to do moar music. One priceless moment is amazing.
Greatly looking forward to hearing everyone's work. :)
Is it alright if I remake an old track, from scratch?
The answer to that in past threads is usually no because the idea of this is to make a new song for the album as opposed to submitting old music.
[QUOTE=Pepin;31376313]The answer to that in past threads is usually no because the idea of this is to make a new song for the album as opposed to submitting old music.[/QUOTE] Really? The last time I checked old songs were allowed.
I have no problem with it not being allowed, I just have an intrest in remaking some of my really old tunes.
[QUOTE=Hakita;31376442]Really? The last time I checked old songs were allowed.[/QUOTE] I followed the first three threads pretty closely and I'm pretty sure when this question got brought up the answer was no. I think I may have been the one saying it a few times, but others agreed. There is a chance I'm mixing this thread up with the concept album thread as well. If we do want to allow older songs we should, there is no reason to be bound be previous consensus.
[QUOTE=Pepin;31377606]I followed the first three threads pretty closely and I'm pretty sure when this question got brought up the answer was no. I think I may have been the one saying it a few times, but others agreed. There is a chance I'm mixing this thread up with the concept album thread as well. If we do want to allow older songs we should, there is no reason to be bound be previous consensus.[/QUOTE] You've got this mixed up with the concept thread. Since I don't remember anything about being against old songs and the last 4 ones I've submitted have been old ones.
I'm iiin.
So has Schmoe222 gotten the information to the bandcamp yet? I want to know the statistics on songs played etc. =)
I think I'll be participating. Here's a preview of my track: [media]http://soundcloud.com/jesper-bendtsen/cheesy-arp-experiment[/media]
[QUOTE=Dick Tracy;31412805]So has Schmoe222 gotten the information to the bandcamp yet? I want to know the statistics on songs played etc. =)[/QUOTE] Harmonizer still hasn't gotten back to me - I'll message him again tomorrow.
I submitted my track, you got it correct? It has one download which I assume it your's. If so, cross off my name. If not, make me aware you didn't get it.
I might have a track I can throw in.
[QUOTE=Pepin;31421028]I submitted my track, you got it correct? It has one download which I assume it your's. If so, cross off my name. If not, make me aware you didn't get it.[/QUOTE] Sorry about that - I got it but I forgot to cross it off the list.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.