[QUOTE=Laserbeams;30376375]It's weird how in the thread about the first part of the review everyone hates the guy, and here everyone seems to agree with him. Probably because in this one he isn't whining that he wants a gun and shoot things all the time[/QUOTE]
probably because fp is filled with bandwagonning puppets relying on the second post for their own opinions
This game is really fun. Don't take it seriously at all, keep in mind that the game isn't the best thing in the world. You will enjoy yourself, people just need to stop being so goddamn critical about everything. It isn't like it's so bad it's unplayable.
[QUOTE=BenJammin';30384124]This game is really fun. Don't take it seriously at all, keep in mind that the game isn't the best thing in the world. You will enjoy yourself, people just need to stop being so goddamn critical about everything. It isn't like it's so bad it's unplayable.[/QUOTE] yea but its 60$ so we need to know if there are alternatives especially with how great this game was supposed to be.
[QUOTE=BenJammin';30384124]This game is really fun. Don't take it seriously at all, keep in mind that the game isn't the best thing in the world. You will enjoy yourself, people just need to stop being so goddamn critical about everything. It isn't like it's so bad it's unplayable.[/QUOTE]
I think people should be critical of any game, especially one that has been in development for 14 years.
[QUOTE=C0linSSX;30382635]Didn't Gearbox start from scratch instead of working from what 3D Realms had? Maybe I'm mistaken.[/QUOTE]
3D Realms actually had the majority of the game done, Gearbox just helped polish it up and add in the multiplayer.
[QUOTE=Big Blue;30383544]probably because fp is filled with bandwagonning puppets relying on the second post for their own opinions[/QUOTE]
FP's also filled with people who whine about nonexistent bandwagons whenever they're faced with a majority that possesses a different opinion from their own.
So, so, so disappointed in this, and I barely had expectations.
[editline]11th June 2011[/editline]
I really hope Serious Sam BFE doesn't fall into this rut as well.
[QUOTE=Aredbomb;30385200]FP's also filled with people who whine about nonexistent bandwagons whenever they're faced with a majority that possesses a different opinion from their own.[/QUOTE]
i dont have an opinion on the game, i never really payed attention to it. thanks for trying though, at least you looked cool in the process
Duke Nukem Fuckthisimwaitingformasseffect3.
[QUOTE=Big Blue;30388877]i dont have an opinion on the game, i never really payed attention to it. thanks for trying though, at least you looked cool in the process[/QUOTE]
You have no opinion on the game, you know hardly anything about it, so you come into the DNF Final Thoughts thread and make a shitty post and an awful comeback to someone who calls you out. Great going.
[QUOTE=Big Blue;30383544]probably because fp is filled with bandwagonning puppets relying on the second post for their own opinions[/QUOTE]
It's the rating system. If something's rated dumb, they're afraid to like it. If it's rated agree, they're afraid to oppose it. The first couple ratings decide how the thread goes.
I wonder if I could cancel my pre-order?
[QUOTE=Samoht;30403903]It's the rating system. If something's rated dumb, they're afraid to like it. If it's rated agree, they're afraid to oppose it. The first couple ratings decide how the thread goes.[/QUOTE]
exactly. as much as they'd like to deny it, they have no personal opinions extending beyond already established opinions
[QUOTE=Big Blue;30404258]exactly. as much as they'd like to deny it, they have no personal opinions extending beyond already established opinions[/QUOTE]
And that is why I normally ignore most ratings.
[QUOTE=JCDentonUNATCO;30403713]You have no opinion on the game, you know hardly anything about it, so you come into the DNF Final Thoughts thread and make a shitty post and an awful comeback to someone who calls you out. Great going.[/QUOTE]
and yet at no point do i talk about the game, rather the observation of a bandwagoning community. so what you're saying is, I dont have an opinion on the game in question, so i'm against you? get over yourself, the forums dont belong to you.
you also manage to establish your presence as a hypocrite by doing exactly what you whine about, making a shitty post that has nothing to do with the game in response to an opinion that differs from yours. i almost feel sorry for all the people on this forum who dont appreciate the beauty of free speech
[editline]12th June 2011[/editline]
[QUOTE=Engie;30404273]And that is why I normally ignore most ratings.[/QUOTE]
you are a model member because of that, no sarcasm
It should be mandatory for every game developer to watch this video before making their next game.
[editline]12th June 2011[/editline]
This made me think, back when doom was in, shooters were trying to copy aspects of doom, same with quake, and now it's call of duty, meanwhile there are games that are left in the dark because they don't try and copy the current standard.
[QUOTE=Geno;30377699]I'd rather wait another 12 years[/QUOTE]
I'd rather wait until I am 70 years old.
I hope this gets better, his first point is ridiculously stupid.
HL2 was linear and that was great, games need good gameplay to make you forget about the linearity. Not get rid of it totally...
[QUOTE='[CWG]RustySpannerz;30405629']I hope this gets better, his first point is ridiculously stupid.
HL2 was linear and that was great, games need good gameplay to make you forget about the linearity. Not get rid of it totally...[/QUOTE]
He gets into it, his point is there is health regeneration and loads of ammo available plus you get the guns you need for the level at the start which means theres no secret caches like in HL2 which give no incentive to explore the level, instead going on a straight line.
Yeah well I could pretty much foresee the flaws of the game without even playing it and without even watching the video.
But the video tells the truth, it's not good. Oh wait, I forgot "It's for the FANS who have been anxiously waiting for 20 years!" yeah well fans couldn't be more disappointed than that I suppose.
Though I bet this game sold a lot of copies.. My heart goes out for the developers, they did the best they could with this long-gone franchise. Maybe it's gone for good now.
To be honest, this looks way better than final version:
[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TDlB2P1leRM[/media]
Still better than Homefront.
[QUOTE=Greendead;30406099]To be honest, this looks way better than final version:
[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TDlB2P1leRM[/media][/QUOTE]
Wasnt is completely pre-rendered?
[QUOTE=PieClock;30377523]I don't understand how half of Facepunch likes this and didn't like Bulletstorm. Obviously, I can't really judge because I haven't played it, but from what I see in that video Bulletstorm blew this out of the water.[/QUOTE]
Facepunch seems to associate anything that Epic games makes other than Unreal Tournament/UDK as shit.
[QUOTE=Judas;30406408]Wasnt is completely pre-rendered?[/QUOTE]
This is also pre-rendered?
[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=omOPjBoClw0[/media]
[QUOTE=mikeyt493;30376600]To be fair in a duke nukem game you SHOULD be running around with guns shooting things all the time.[/QUOTE]
Why does everyone keep thinking that standard 90's gameplay is a damn Duke exclusive, In Doom and Wolfenstein you shot enemies all the time, you carried all weapons at all time and other gameplay mechanics that were standard then.
Duke Nukem didn't event those things, the only way Duke was different was because of his personality and what you could interact with in the game. DNF you can interact with way more then Duke 3D and Duke still has the same personality hes always had.
Say they made a completely different guy for Duke 3D, one who didn't talk and say corny lines and make references, and you couldn't interact with anything. People now wouldn't be going "OMG ITS DUKZ ONLY THAT WAY" no, people would think it was a generic shooter just replacing demons from doom with aliens.
[QUOTE=Greendead;30406815]This is also pre-rendered?
[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=omOPjBoClw0[/media][/QUOTE]
wow that actually looks better than DNF, I wish that was released
You know, I find this review sound like a hardcore shooting fan complaining about this game.
[QUOTE=Judas;30406408]Wasnt is completely pre-rendered?[/QUOTE]
Someone at some point said it was, but not long ago, someone who actually did work on the game said that only a few scenes in that were made specifically for the trailer. Most of it was actually playable as it was.
[QUOTE=Devil Traitor;30407751]You know, I find this review sound like a hardcore shooting fan complaining about this game.[/QUOTE]
Umm DN is (meant to be) a hardcore shooting game so he's completely right DN sucks because the guns were shit, the game was fucking boring and the gameplay was fucked up
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
